Nationwide proficiency assessment of bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing among 110 laboratories in Lebanon

Introduction: Proficiency testing (PT) is one of the most valuable and important activities for the Clinical Microbiology Laboratories (CML) to enroll in to ensure the accuracy and reliability of results. This first time conducted nationwide study was warranted to assess the PT performance activity among CML in Lebanon. Methodology: Four training and PT activities were organized for 110 nationwide laboratories involved in providing clinical microbiology services. In each PT activity, five different bacterial species were distributed to each laboratory to provide identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AMST) according to prior discussions and guidelines. Results: The percentages of labs that correctly identified the bacterial species and performed the relevant AMST to it, respectively, were as follows: S. aureus, (100% and 67.8%); Enterococcus faecalis (71% and 82%); Listeria monocytogenes (75% and 61%); Streptococcus agalactiae (86% and 71%); Corynebacterium amycolatum (7% and 33 %); Pseudomonas aeruginosa, (93 % and 53.4%); Klebsiella pneumoniae, (97% and 67.7%); Salmonella typhi ESBL (87 % and 66%); Enterobacter aerogenes (89% and 59%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (84 % and 65%). The resistant types for the species were specified by labs as carbapenem resistant (CR) K. pneumoniae in 78 %, CR E. aerogenes in 34 %, MRSA in 83 %, and VRE in 80.5%. Conclusions: The wide variation as well as the overall humble scoring of accurate results reflects the dire need for the MOPH to establish and maintain a PT activity program, and entrust the reference laboratory to provide continuing education and training sessions.

[1]  A. Yahaya,et al.  External Quality Assessment of Bacterial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in African National Public Health Laboratories, 2011–2016 , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  R. Feghali,et al.  A compilation of antimicrobial susceptibility data from a network of 13 Lebanese hospitals reflecting the national situation during 2015–2016 , 2019, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control.

[3]  R. Carey What Is a Quality Management System, and Why Should a Microbiologist Adopt One? , 2018, Clinical Microbiology Newsletter.

[4]  Max Salfinger,et al.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Implementing a Quality Management System in the Medical Microbiology Laboratory , 2018, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[5]  Z. Gülay,et al.  [National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (NAMRSS) external quality assessment studies: 2011-2016]. , 2017, Mikrobiyoloji bulteni.

[6]  Karen J Breckenridge,et al.  Practices and Perceived Value of Proficiency Testing in Clinical Laboratories. , 2017, The journal of applied laboratory medicine.

[7]  Heather L. Stang,et al.  Use of Proficiency Testing as a Tool to Improve Quality in Microbiology Laboratories. , 2013, Clinical microbiology newsletter.

[8]  G. Araj,et al.  A reflection on bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents at a major tertiary care center in Lebanon over a decade. , 2012, Le Journal medical libanais. The Lebanese medical journal.

[9]  John Frean,et al.  External quality assessment of national public health laboratories in Africa, 2002-2009. , 2012, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[10]  E J Baron,et al.  Role of clinical microbiology laboratories in the management and control of infectious diseases and the delivery of health care. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  F. Tenover,et al.  Ability of Laboratories To Detect Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance: Proficiency Testing and Quality Control Results from the World Health Organization's External Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  Janet Penrod Hodnett,et al.  Proficiency Testing: We All Do It— But What Do the Results Mean? , 1999 .