Emergency department crowding and thrombolysis delays in acute myocardial infarction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE We estimate the effect of emergency department (ED) crowding on door-to-needle time for patients given intravenous thrombolysis for suspected acute myocardial infarction. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study of patients thrombolyzed in the ED for suspected acute myocardial infarction in 1998 to 2000 in 25 community and teaching hospital EDs in Ontario. EDs located close together and sharing a common ambulance diversion system were grouped into networks consisting of 2 to 5 hospitals each. At patient registration in an ED, the ambulance diversion status of all EDs in the network was determined. Network crowding was calculated as the percentage of EDs that were diverting ambulances on patient registration, categorized as none (0%), moderate (<60%), and high (> or =60%). Door-to-needle time was defined as time from ED registration to drug administration. Multivariable quantile regression and logistic regression were carried out; covariates included age, sex, ECG characteristics, previous acute myocardial infarction, vital signs, time of presentation, and hospital type. RESULTS A total of 3,452 thrombolysis patients were included: mean age was 62.9 years, and 73% were male patients. Overall median door-to-needle time was 43 minutes (interquartile ratio 27 to 80). Median door-to-needle time was 40, 45, and 47 minutes in conditions of none, moderate, and high network crowding, respectively ( P <.001). The adjusted odds ratios for door-to-needle time delay (>30 minutes) and major delay (>60 minutes) were 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98 to 1.79) and 1.40 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.75), respectively, for high network crowding compared with none, and 1.21 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.63) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.29), respectively, for moderate crowding compared with none. In multivariate analyses, moderate and high crowding conditions were associated with increased median door-to-needle time (3.0 minutes [95% CI 0.1 to 6.0] and 5.8 minutes [95% CI 2.7 to 9.0], respectively). CONCLUSION ED crowding is associated with increased door-to-needle times for patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and may represent a barrier to improving cardiac care in EDs.

[1]  J. Brophy,et al.  The delay to thrombolysis: an analysis of hospital and patient characteristics. Quebec Acute Coronary Care Working Group. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  W. Weaver,et al.  Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  E. Gallagher,et al.  The etiology of medical gridlock: causes of emergency department overcrowding in New York City. , 1990, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[4]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico.,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYTIC TREATMENT IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1986, The Lancet.

[5]  L. Morrison,et al.  Emergency department gridlock and out-of-hospital delays for cardiac patients. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  L. Shaw,et al.  Delays in thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: association with mode of transportation to the hospital, age, sex, and race. , 2001, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[7]  Karin V Rhodes,et al.  A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  William Gould,et al.  Quantile regression with bootstrapped standard errors , 1993 .

[9]  Sarah Parish,et al.  Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  D. Simons-Morton,et al.  The National Heart Attack Alert Program: Progress at 5 Years in Educating Providers, Patients, and the Public and Future Directions , 1998, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[11]  C. Patterson,et al.  Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. , 1995 .

[12]  B. Asplin,et al.  Does ambulance diversion matter? , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[13]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1996 .

[14]  Johan Herlitz,et al.  Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction : collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994 .

[15]  J. Rawles,et al.  Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT). , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  V. Goel,et al.  Time-series analysis of the relation between influenza virus and hospital admissions of the elderly in Ontario, Canada, for pneumonia, chronic lung disease, and congestive heart failure. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  R. Califf,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Veys,et al.  HL-A AND INFECTIVE SACROILEITIS , 1974 .

[19]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Emergency department overcrowding following systematic hospital restructuring: trends at twenty hospitals over ten years. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[20]  J. Richards,et al.  Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[21]  N Shute,et al.  Code blue crisis in the ER. Turning away patients. Long delays. A surefire recipe for disaster. , 2001, U.S. news & world report.

[22]  Muhammad M Mamdani,et al.  Community influenza outbreaks and emergency department ambulance diversion. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[23]  John Mullooly,et al.  Influenza vaccination and reduction in hospitalizations for cardiac disease and stroke among the elderly. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  No place to unload: a preliminary analysis of the prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of ambulance diversion. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  Daniel M Fatovich,et al.  Emergency medicine , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  A Haycox,et al.  Early thrombolysis for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[27]  Peter C Austin,et al.  A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario. , 2002, American heart journal.

[28]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[30]  Donald A Redelmeier,et al.  Emergency department overcrowding and ambulance transport delays for patients with chest pain. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[31]  K. Fox,et al.  Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis. , 1992, BMJ.

[32]  C. Maxey.  A case map reduces time to administration of thrombolytic therapy in patients experiencing an acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, Nursing case management : managing the process of patient care.

[33]  Marian Vermeulen,et al.  Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[34]  W. French.  Trends in acute myocardial infarction management: use of the National Registry ofMyocardial Infarction in quality improvement. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  P. Austin,et al.  Quantile regression: a statistical tool for out-of-hospital research. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[36]  J. Brophy,et al.  The delay to thrombolysis: an analysis of patient and hospital characteristics , 1998 .

[37]  G Dickinson,et al.  Emergency department overcrowding. , 1989, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[38]  Impact of ambulance diversion policies in urban, suburban, and rural areas of Central Maryland. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[39]  Michael Schull,et al.  The development of indicators to measure the quality of clinical care in emergency departments following a modified-delphi approach. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[40]  J. Richards,et al.  Emergency Department Overcrowding in Florida, New York, and Texas , 2002, Southern medical journal.

[41]  W. Weaver,et al.  Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.