3D Printers as Sociable Technologies

3D printers have become continuously more present and are a perspicuous example of how technologies are becoming more complex and ubiquitous. To some extent, the emerging technological infrastructures around them exemplify ways how digitalization will change production machines and lines, in general, in the Internet of Things (IoT). From an End-User Development perspective, the main question is how users can be supported in managing those complex digital production lines. To reach a better understanding, we carefully analyzed 3D printers as an example of highly digitalized production machines with regard to the creative activities of their users that help them to make these machines work for their practices. In our study of appropriation processes, we are concerned with situational and social aspects of the configuration and practice challenges associated with making digitalization work and how IoT technologies can support these collaborative appropriation activities of end users by making these machines more “sociable.” We therefore conceptualize the idea of “Sociable Technologies” and implement a prototype that provides hardware-integrated affordances for communicating and documenting practices of usage. Based on the findings of our evaluation, we derive lessons learnt when aiming at making complex technologies more usable.

[1]  Simon Holland,et al.  Kolab: appropriation & improvisation in mobile tangible collaborative interaction , 2012, DIS '12.

[2]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Community Knowledge Sharing in Practice: The Eureka Story , 2002 .

[3]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[4]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Appropriation Infrastructure: Mediating Appropriation and Production Work , 2010, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[5]  John Stanislav Sadar,et al.  3D scanning and printing as a new medium for creativity in product design , 2011 .

[6]  Margaret Burnett,et al.  End-User Development , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Patterns of sharing customizable software , 1990, CSCW '90.

[9]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation , 2009 .

[12]  Wendy March,et al.  Designing technology for community appropriation , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[13]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Appropriating Digital Fabrication Technologies — A comparative study of two 3D Printing Communities , 2015 .

[14]  Yannick Prié,et al.  DIAM: towards a model for describing appropriation processes through the evolution of digital artifacts , 2012, DIS '12.

[15]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Case studies in the personal fabrication of electronic products , 2012, DIS '12.

[16]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Supporting the Collaborative Appropriation of an Open Software Ecosystem , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[17]  Rémi Barraquand Designing Sociable Technologies , 2012 .

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  Claudia Fonseca,et al.  The interpretation of cultures: selected essays , 2007 .

[20]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[21]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[22]  Volkmar Pipek,et al.  From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage , 2005 .

[23]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[24]  Anna-Liisa Syrjänen,et al.  ‘INFRASTRUCTURING’ AS CAPTURING IN-SITU DESIGN , 2006 .

[25]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users , 1992, CHI.

[26]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Towards sociable technologies: an empirical study on designing appropriation infrastructures for 3D printing , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[27]  ニール ガーシェンフェルド,et al.  How to Make Almost Anything : The Digital Fabrication Revolution , 2012 .

[28]  Alexander Boden,et al.  Supporting the social context of technology appropriation: on a synthesis of sharing tools and tool knowledge , 2012, CHI.

[29]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Materializing information: 3D printing and social change , 2012, First Monday.

[30]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Design Issues in Gaze Guidance Under review with ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction , 2009 .

[31]  LudwigThomas,et al.  3D Printers as Sociable Technologies , 2017 .

[32]  Wim Bouman,et al.  The Realm of Sociality: Notes on the Design of Social Software , 2007, ICIS.

[33]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  At the seams: DIYbio and opportunities for HCI , 2012, DIS '12.

[34]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[35]  Catarina Mota,et al.  The rise of personal fabrication , 2011, C&C '11.

[36]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Practice-Based Computing: Empirically Grounded Conceptualizations Derived from Design Case Studies , 2015, Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real-World.

[37]  Ina Wagner,et al.  Making things work: dimensions of configurability as appropriation work , 2006, CSCW '06.

[38]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Artful infrastructuring in two cases of community PD , 2004, PDC 04.

[39]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Situated evaluation for cooperative systems , 1994, CSCW '94.

[40]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice , 2013, CHI.

[41]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  End-User Development (Human-Computer Interaction Series) , 2006 .

[42]  Dale Dougherty,et al.  The Maker Mindset , 2013 .

[43]  Fahri Yetim,et al.  Fostering Continuous User Participation by Embedding a Communication Support Tool in User Interfaces , 2012 .

[44]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Appropriation Infrastructure: Supporting the Design of Usages , 2009, IS-EUD.

[45]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Participation in design things , 2008, PDC.

[46]  Alicia Gibb,et al.  Research with a hacker ethos: what DIY means for tangible interaction research , 2012, INTR.

[47]  Volkmar Pipek,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Tailoring , 2006, End User Development.

[48]  Jack Whalen,et al.  Expert systems versus systems for experts: computer-aided dispatch as a support system in real-world environments , 1995 .

[49]  Alexander Boden,et al.  Workplace warriors: identifying team practices of appropriation in software ecosystems , 2011, CHASE '11.

[50]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .

[51]  Jack Whalen,et al.  A TECHNOLOGY OF ORDER PRODUCTION: COMPUTER-AIDED DISPATCH IN PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS* , 2010 .

[52]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  End-User Development , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[53]  Gabriela Avram,et al.  Do-It-Yourself Sustainable Living: Op- portunities and challenges for DIY communities , 2013 .

[54]  John Irwin,et al.  Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers , 2013, Mechatronics.