Axial loaded MRI of the lumbar spine.

[1]  J Willén,et al.  The Diagnostic Effect From Axial Loading of the Lumbar Spine During Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Degenerative Disorders , 2001, Spine.

[2]  J Willén,et al.  Axially Loaded Magnetic Resonance Image of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Individuals , 2001, Spine.

[3]  A. Hargens,et al.  Lumbar Spine Disc Height and Curvature Responses to an Axial Load Generated by a Compression Device Compatible with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Spine.

[4]  V. Zatsiorsky,et al.  A Method to Study Lumbar Spine Response to Axial Compression During Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technical Note , 2001, Spine.

[5]  V. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Lumbar Spine Mechanical Response to Axial Compression Load In Vivo , 2001, Spine.

[6]  V. Haughton,et al.  Morphologic Changes in the Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Due to Flexion-Extension, Lateral Bending, and Axial Rotation: An In Vitro Anatomic and Biomechanical Study , 2001, Spine.

[7]  A. Saifuddin,et al.  The imaging of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[8]  V. Seifert,et al.  Dynamic examination of the lumbar spine by using vertical, open magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  S. Chung,et al.  Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal , 2000, Skeletal Radiology.

[10]  M. Zanetti,et al.  Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MR imaging? , 2000, Radiology.

[11]  A. Saifuddin,et al.  MRI of the lumbar intervertebral disc. , 1999, Clinical radiology.

[12]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Changes in cross-sectional measurements of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramina as a function of body position: in vivo studies on an open-configuration MR system. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  F. Jolesz,et al.  Functional MRI of the lumbar spine in erect position in a superconducting open‐configuration MR system: Preliminary results , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  T. Hansson,et al.  Axial Loading of the Spine during CT and MR in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1998, Acta radiologica.

[15]  Zander Dr,et al.  Positionally dependent spinal stenosis: correlation of upright flexion-extension myelography and computed tomographic myelography. , 1998 .

[16]  A Benini,et al.  Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. , 1998, Radiology.

[17]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic Effects on the Lumbar Spinal Canal: Axially Loaded CT‐Myelography and MRI in Patients With Sciatica and/or Neurogenic Claudication , 1997, Spine.

[18]  V. Haughton,et al.  Anatomic Changes of the Spinal Canal and Intervertebral Foramen Associated With Flexion‐Extension Movement , 1996, Spine.

[19]  L. Riley,et al.  Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  B. Hart,et al.  Effect of Lordosis on the Position of the Nucleus Pulposus in Supine Subjects: A Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1994, Spine.

[21]  V. Haughton,et al.  Effect of axial loading on neural foramina and nerve roots in the lumbar spine. , 1990, Radiology.

[22]  R. Herzog.  Radiologic imaging in spinal stenosis. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.

[23]  P. Lander,et al.  Positionally dependent spinal stenosis: correlation of upright flexion-extension myelography and computed tomographic myelography. , 1998, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[24]  D. Choy.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine under compression. , 1997, Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery.