Sample size needed to detect gene-gene interactions using association designs.

It is likely that many complex diseases result from interactions among several genes, as well as environmental factors. The presence of such interactions poses challenges to investigators in identifying susceptibility genes, understanding biologic pathways, and predicting and controlling disease risks. Recently, Gauderman (Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:478-84) reported results from the first systematic analysis of the statistical power needed to detect gene-gene interactions in association studies. However, Gauderman used different statistical models to model disease risks for different study designs, and he assumed a very low disease prevalence to make different models more comparable. In this article, assuming a logistic model for disease risk for different study designs, the authors investigate the power of population-based and family-based association designs to detect gene-gene interactions for common diseases. The results indicate that population-based designs are more powerful than family-based designs for detecting gene-gene interactions when disease prevalence in the study population is moderate.

[1]  C. Falk,et al.  Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations , 1987, Annals of human genetics.

[2]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Sample size determination in studies with matched pairs. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  D. Clayton,et al.  Statistical modeling of interlocus interactions in a complex disease: rejection of the multiplicative model of epistasis in type 1 diabetes. , 2001, Genetics.

[4]  N. Risch.  Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium , 2000, Nature.

[5]  N Risch,et al.  The Future of Genetic Studies of Complex Human Diseases , 1996, Science.

[6]  D J Schaid,et al.  Case‐parents design for gene‐environment interaction , 1999, Genetic epidemiology.

[7]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  W Bateson,et al.  FACTS LIMITING THE THEORY OF HEREDITY. , 1907, Science.

[9]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Association mapping in structured populations. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  W D Dupont,et al.  Power calculations for matched case-control studies. , 1988, Biometrics.

[11]  Nancy J. Cox,et al.  Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[12]  W. Gauderman.  Sample size requirements for association studies of gene-gene interaction. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Testing for gene-gene interaction controlling total IgE in families from Barbados: evidence of sensitivity regarding linkage heterogeneity among families. , 2001, Genomics.

[14]  J. Blangero,et al.  Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect epistasis , 1997, Genetic Epidemiology.

[15]  James J Schlesselman.  Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis , 1982 .

[16]  S. Zhang,et al.  Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[18]  Hongyu Zhao,et al.  Interacting genetic loci on chromosomes 20 and 10 influence extreme human obesity. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Gene-gene interaction between apoB and apoE in determining plasma levels and heterogeneity of apoB-containing lipoproteins , 1998 .

[20]  R. Elston,et al.  Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[22]  N Risch,et al.  The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling. , 1998, Genome research.

[23]  E. Oord.  A Comparison Between Different Designs and Tests to Detect QTLs in Association Studies , 1999 .

[24]  K. Roeder,et al.  The power of genomic control. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.