A New Bayesian Spatial Model for Brand Positioning

Purpose: Joint space multidimensional scaling (MDS) maps are often utilized for positioning analyses and are estimated with survey data of consumer preferences, choices, considerations, intentions, etc. so as to provide a parsimonious spatial depiction of the competitive landscape. However, little attention has been given to the possibility that consumers may show heterogeneity in their information usage (e.g. Bettman et al., 1998) and the possible impact this may have on the corresponding estimated joint space maps. This paper address this important issue and proposes a new Bayesian Multidimensional Unfolding model for the analysis of two or three-way preference data. Our new MDS model explicitly accommodates dimensional selection and preference heterogeneity simultaneously in a unified framework.Design/Methodology/Approach: This manuscript introduces a new Bayesian hierarchical spatial model with accompanying MCMC algorithm for estimation that explicitly places constraints on a set of scale parameters in such a way as to model a consumer to use or not use each latent dimension in forming their preferences, while at the same time permitting consumers to differentially weigh each utilized latent dimension. In this manner, both preference heterogeneity and dimensionality selection heterogeneity are modeled simultaneously.Findings: The superiority of our model over existing spatial models is demonstrated in both the case of simulated data, where the structure of the data are known in advance, as well as in an empirical application/illustration relating to the positioning of digital cameras. In the empirical application/illustration, the policy implications of accounting for the presence of dimensionality selection heterogeneity is shown to be derived from the Bayesian spatial analyses conducted. The results demonstrate that a model that incorporates dimensionality selection heterogeneity outperforms models that cannot recognize that consumers may be selective in the product information that they choose to process. Such results also show that a marketing manager may encounter biased parameter estimates and distorted market structures if s/he ignores such dimensionality selection heterogeneity. The proposed Bayesian spatial model provides information regarding how individual consumers utilize each dimension, and how the relationship with behavioral variables can help marketers understand the underlying reasons for selective dimensional usage. Further, the proposed approach helps a marketing manager to identify major dimension(s) that could maximize the effect of a change of brand positioning, and thus identify potential opportunities/threats that existing multidimensional scaling methods cannot provide.Originality/Value: To date, no existent spatial model utilized for brand positioning can accommodate the various forms of heterogeneity exhibited by real consumers mentioned above. The end result can be very inaccurate and biased portrayals of competitive market structure whose strategy implications may be wrong and non-optimal. Given the role of such spatial models in the classical Segmentation-Targeting-Positioning paradigm which forms the basis of all marketing strategy, the value of such research can be dramatic in many Marketing applications, as illustrated in the manuscript via analyses of both synthetic and actual data.

[1]  Tülin Erdem A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data , 1996 .

[2]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Adaptive Self-Explication of Multiattribute Preferences , 2011 .

[3]  Terry Elrod,et al.  Choice Map: Inferring a Product-Market Map from Panel Data , 1988 .

[4]  Elizabeth Cowley,et al.  What Do Novice Consumers Remember , 2005 .

[5]  E. George,et al.  APPROACHES FOR BAYESIAN VARIABLE SELECTION , 1997 .

[6]  M. Davison A reformulation of the general Euclidean model for the external analysis of preference data , 1988 .

[7]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[8]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[9]  V. Rao,et al.  GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the general UnFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data , 1984 .

[10]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  S. Chib,et al.  Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output , 2001 .

[12]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[13]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  A Constrained Unfolding Methodology for Product Positioning , 1986 .

[14]  S. Chib Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output , 1995 .

[15]  P. Groenen,et al.  Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation , 2005 .

[16]  J. Douglas Carroll,et al.  Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part II, Multidimensional Scaling , 1997 .

[17]  W. Wong,et al.  The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .

[18]  Thomas S. Gruca,et al.  Optimal new product positioning: A genetic algorithm approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Robert P. Leone,et al.  Nonlinear Mapping: An Alternative to Multidimensional Scaling for Product Positioning , 1991 .

[20]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Deriving joint space positioning maps from consumer preference ratings , 2011 .

[21]  Michel Wedel,et al.  An Exponential-Family Multidimensional Scaling Mixture Methodology , 1996 .

[22]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  A Bayesian Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for the Spatial Analysis of Revealed Choice Data , 1998 .

[23]  Kevin Lane Keller Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity , 1997 .

[24]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling: An Introduction and Comparison of Nonmetric Unfolding Techniques , 1969 .

[25]  E. George,et al.  Journal of the American Statistical Association is currently published by American Statistical Association. , 2007 .

[26]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Automated Marketing Research Using Online Customer Reviews , 2011 .

[27]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[28]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to the Spatial Representation of Market Structure from Consumer Choice Data , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  G. Urban PERCEPTOR: A Model for Product Positioning , 1975 .

[30]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Multidimensional Scaling Methodology for Accommodating Both Structural and Preference Heterogeneity , 2008 .

[31]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Robert E. McCulloch,et al.  Account-Level Modeling for Trade Promotion: An Application of a Constrained Parameter Hierarchical Model , 1999 .

[33]  Brand Positioning Using Multidimensional Scaling , 1975 .

[34]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Little Engines That Could: Modeling the Performance of World Wide Web Search Engines , 2000 .

[35]  William R. Dillon,et al.  Decision Issues in Building Perceptual Product Spaces with Multi-attribute Rating Data , 1985 .

[36]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[37]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Models for Heterogeneous Variable Selection , 2006 .

[38]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Latent Class Multidimensional Scaling. A Review of Recent Developments in the Marketing and Psychometric Literature , 1994 .

[39]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes When Time Is Money: Decision Behavior under Opportunity-cost Time Pressure , 2022 .

[40]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[41]  Steven M. Shugan Estimating Brand Positioning Maps Using Supermarket Scanning Data , 1987 .

[42]  C. Coombs A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[43]  R. A. Harshman,et al.  Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model , 1984 .

[44]  Crystal J. Scott,et al.  A Bayesian Vector Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for the Analysis of Ordered Preference Data , 2010 .

[45]  A. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian Multidimensional Scaling and Choice of Dimension , 2001 .