Description logics in medical informatics

Description logics and related formalisms are being applied in at least five applications in medical informatics—terminology, intelligent user interfaces, decision support and semantic indexing, language technology, and systems integration. Important issues include size, complexity, connectivity, and the wide range of granularity required—medical terminologies require on the order of 250,000 concepts, some involving a dozen or more conjuncts with deep nesting; the nature of anatomy and physiology is that everything connects to everything else; and notions to be represented range from psychology to molecular biology. Technical issues for expressivity have focused on problems of part-whole relations and the need to provide “framelike” functionality—i.e., the ability to determine efficiently what can sensibly be said about any particular concept and means of handling at least limited cases of defaults with exceptions. There are also significant problems with “semantic normalisation” and “clinical pragmatics” because understanding medical notions often depends on implicit knowledge and some notions defy easy logical formulation. The two best known efforts—OpenGalen and SNOMED-RT—both use idiosyncratic description logics with generally limited expressivity but specialised extensions to cope with issues around part-whole and other transitive relations. There is also a conflict between the needs for re-use and the requirement for easy understandability by domain expert authors. OpenGalen has coped with this conflict by introducing a layered architecture with a high level “Intermediate Representation” which insulates authors from the details of the description logic which is treated as an “assembly language” rather than the primary medium for expressing the ontology.

[1]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Research Paper: Experiments in Concept Modeling for Radiographic Image Reports , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Ontological Issues in using a Description Logic to Represent Medical Concepts: Experience from GALEN , 2004 .

[3]  Pierre Zweigenbaum,et al.  Issues in the Structuring and Acquisition of an Ontology for Medical Language Understanding , 1995, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[4]  G De Moor,et al.  From natural language to formal language: when MultiTALE meets GALEN. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  C Payne,et al.  Read Codes Version 3: A User Led Terminology , 1995, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  R A Rocha,et al.  Automated translation between medical vocabularies using a frame-based interlingua. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[7]  A L Rector,et al.  Goals for concept representation in the GALEN project. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[8]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Medical Knowledge Representation and Predictive Data Entry , 1991, AIME.

[9]  R Baud,et al.  Galen-In-Use: an EU Project applied to the development of a new national coding system for surgical procedures: NCAM. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  C Lovis,et al.  Modelling for natural language understanding. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[11]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[12]  Mark S. Tuttle The Position of the Canon Group: A Reality Check , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[14]  A L Rector,et al.  From terminology to terminology services. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[15]  P J Haug,et al.  Designing a controlled medical vocabulary server: the VOSER project. , 1994, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[16]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  A case study in ontology library construction , 1995, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[17]  A. Gorbovsky [The generation]. , 1970, ADM; revista de la Asociacion Dental Mexicana.

[18]  G O Barnett,et al.  Automated translation between medical terminologies using semantic definitions. , 1990, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[19]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Research Paper: A Logical Foundation for Representation of Clinical Data , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Lin Padgham,et al.  A Framework for Part-of Hierarchies in Terminological Logics , 1994, KR.

[21]  Kent A. Spackman,et al.  A "lexically-suggested logical closure" metric for medical terminology maturity , 1998, AMIA.

[22]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Using a Description Logic with Concept Inclusions , 1996, Description Logics.

[23]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Part-Whole Reasoning: A Case Study in Medical Ontology Engineering , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[24]  A. Rector,et al.  Ontological Issues in using a Description Logic to Represent Medical Concepts : Part II-The GALEN High Level Schemas , 2008 .

[25]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  The digital anatomist foundational model: principles for defining and structuring its concept domain , 1998, AMIA.

[26]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Reconciling users' needs and formal requirements: issues in developing a reusable ontology for medicine , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[27]  E H Shortliffe,et al.  Scalable Methodologies for Distributed Development of Logic-Based Convergent Medical Terminology , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[28]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Designing an Introspective, Multipurpose, Controlled Medical Vocabulary. , 1989 .

[29]  Martin Romacker,et al.  Partonomic Reasoning as Taxonomic Reasoning in Medicine , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[30]  Henry A. Mess,et al.  On Terminology , 1940 .

[31]  L M Fagan,et al.  PEN-Ivory: the design and evaluation of a pen-based computer system for structured data entry. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[32]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Syntactic-semantic tagging as a mediator between linguistic representations and formal models: an exercise in linking SNOMED to GALEN , 1999, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[33]  D. Detmer,et al.  Capacity Building in e-Health and Health Informatics: A Review of the Global Vision and Informatics Educational Initiatives of the American Medical Informatics Association , 2010, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[34]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[35]  A. Rector,et al.  A Terminology Server for Medical Language and Medical Information Systems , 1995, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[36]  P. Ramos-Canseco To be a patient. , 2013, Puerto Rico health sciences journal.

[37]  G De Moor,et al.  The distinction between linguistic and conceptual semantics in medical terminology and its implication for NLP-based knowledge acquisition. , 1998, Methods of information in medicine.

[38]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Inheritance of Drug Information , 2000, AMIA.

[39]  Eric Mays,et al.  K-Rep system overview , 1991, SGAR.

[40]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  An Ontological Analysis of Surgical Deeds , 1997, AIME.

[41]  Kent A. Spackman,et al.  SNOMED RT: a reference terminology for health care , 1997, AMIA.

[42]  Mikhail Soutchanski,et al.  A description logic based situation calculus , 2010, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[43]  E H Shortliffe,et al.  Gálapagos: computer-based support for evolution of a convergent medical terminology. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.