Multidisciplinary Drag Optimization of Reduced Stiffness Flexible Wing Aircraft With Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap

This paper presents a study of the optimization of an aeroelastic wing shape in order to improve aerodynamic efficiency through minimization of drag at different cruise flight conditions. The aircraft model used for the study is based on the NASA Generic Transport Model (GTM), with the wing structures of the model incorporating a novel aerodynamic control surface known as the Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap (VCCTEF). The wings of the aircraft are modeled both with a baseline stiffness distribution typical of current commercial aircraft, and also with the stiffness in both bending and torsion reduced by 50%. The aeroelastic structural framework developed for the GTM model is implemented using finite element analysis. Aerodynamic modeling conducted using a vortex-lattice method is coupled with the structural framework through a geometry generation tool to form the static aeroelastic model. Additional corrections are applied to the model to include aerodynamic effects due skin friction drag and potential shock formation at transonic flight conditions. Gradient-based constrained optimization, with the gradient approximated using a forward finite difference method, is conducted to tailor the initial wing jig-shape twist and VCCTEF deflection settings for drag reduction at offdesign cruise flight conditions. Optimization is performed on both the aircraft with baseline stiffness wings and the aircraft with half stiffness wings, and a comparison is made as to the effectiveness on wing shaping using the VCCTEF for a stiff versus more flexible wing. The results demonstrate the potential of utilizing the novel control surface on aircraft for wing shaping control to improve aerodynamic efficiency for both baseline stiffness and half stiffness wings.

[1]  G. Vanderplaats,et al.  Structural optimization by methods of feasible directions. , 1973 .

[2]  Antony Jameson,et al.  A multi-grid method for the computation of viscid/inviscid interactions on airfoils , 1983 .

[3]  Edward A. Sadek,et al.  Application of methods of feasible directions to structural optimization problems , 1983 .

[4]  J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aerodynamics , 1984 .

[5]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Multidiscipline Design Optimization , 1988 .

[6]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  A Parallel Multilevel Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grids with Embedded Boundaries , 2000 .

[7]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity , 2002 .

[8]  Ronald Slingerland,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of Transport Aircraft , 2009 .

[9]  Ilhan Tuzcu,et al.  Nonlinear Aeroelasticity of a Flexible Wing Structure Coupled with Aircraft Flight Dynamics , 2012 .

[10]  Nhan Nguyen,et al.  Elastically Shaped Wing Optimization and Aircraft Concept for Improved Cruise Efficiency , 2013 .

[11]  Eric Ting,et al.  A Mission-Adaptive Variable Camber Flap Control System to Optimize High Lift and Cruise Lift-to-Drag Ratios of Future N+3 Transport Aircraft , 2013 .

[12]  Eric Ting,et al.  Flutter Analysis of Mission-Adaptive Wing with Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap , 2014 .

[13]  Eric Ting,et al.  Static Aeroelastic and Longitudinal Trim Model of Flexible Wing Aircraft Using Finite-Element Vortex-Lattice Coupled Solution , 2014 .

[14]  U. Kaul,et al.  A 3-D Drag Optimization Study of Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap (VCCTEF) Using OVERFLOW , 2014 .

[15]  Sonia Lebofsky,et al.  Aeroelastic Modeling and Drag Optimization of Flexible Wing Aircraft with Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap , 2014 .