Tacit Knowledge Based Acquisition of Verified Machining Data

In the era of digitalization, the efficiency of machine tools can be improved due to optimized machining simulations. However, actual simulations only consider the kinematics of the machine tool and not the influence of the machining data, which are changed by experienced machine operators rather frequently. Moreover, these changes of machining data are not always properly communicated. For various reasons, this important knowledge of the machine operators remains tacit. Transferring tacit knowledge of the machine tool operators at the shop floor automatically to a database has not been possible so far. This paper describes a workflow for the acquisition of verified machining data and how to transfer them to a database.

[1]  T L Johnson,et al.  How and why we need to capture tacit knowledge in manufacturing: Case studies of visual inspection. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Mikael Hedlind,et al.  Digital Twin of a Cutting Tool , 2018 .

[3]  Jorge Muniz,et al.  Engaging environments: tacit knowledge sharing on the shop floor , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Indrajit Mukherjee,et al.  A review of optimization techniques in metal cutting processes , 2006, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Firman Ridwan,et al.  Advanced CNC system with in-process feed-rate optimisation , 2013 .

[6]  Eberhard Abele,et al.  Potentials of Digitalization in Tool Management , 2017 .

[7]  Lutfi Taner Tunc,et al.  Generalized model for dynamics and stability of multi-axis milling with complex tool geometries , 2016 .

[8]  Krzysztof Jemielniak,et al.  Advanced monitoring of machining operations , 2010 .

[9]  Ya-Hui Hsu,et al.  Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability , 2009 .

[10]  Magnus Holm,et al.  The future shop-floor operators, demands, requirements and interpretations , 2018 .

[11]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Virtual machine tool , 2005 .

[13]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Empowering and Engaging Solutions for Operator 4.0 - Acceptance and Foreseen Impacts by Factory Workers , 2019, APMS.

[14]  Richard V. McCarthy,et al.  Success Stories in Knowledge Management Systems , 2017 .

[15]  T. Warren Liao,et al.  A research on the cutting database system based on machining features and TOPSIS , 2017 .

[16]  Kaan Erkorkmaz,et al.  Digital shadow identification from feed drive structures for virtual process planning , 2019, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology.

[17]  Nouby M. Ghazaly,et al.  Machinability study and multi-response optimization of cutting force, Surface roughness and tool wear on CNC turned Inconel 617 superalloy using Al2O3 Nanofluids in Coconut oil , 2019, Procedia Manufacturing.

[18]  Ali R. Yildiz,et al.  Optimization of cutting parameters in multi-pass turning using artificial bee colony-based approach , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[19]  K Szwajka,et al.  An overview of data acquisition system for cutting force measuring and optimization in milling , 2010 .

[20]  Donald A. Sofge,et al.  Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything , 2018, AAAI Spring Symposia.