A method to determine collection efficiency of particles by swipe sampling

A methodology was developed to evaluate particle collection efficiencies from swipe sampling of trace residues. Swipe sampling is used for many applications where trace residues must be collected, including the evaluation of radioactive particle contamination and the analysis of explosives and contraband at screening checkpoints using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS). Collection efficiencies were evaluated for micrometer-sized polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres with respect to the particle size and mode of deposition, collection trap, surface type and swiping force. Test surfaces containing particles were prepared under controlled conditions and swiped with a reproducible technique that allows for the evaluation of frictional forces. Collection efficiencies were determined by optical imaging and particle counting. Of the two IMS collection traps studied, the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) trap has significantly lower collection efficiencies. This is likely to be due to a combination of texture and composition. The larger (42 µm diameter) particles are collected more efficiently than the smaller (9 µm diameter) particles. Particles in a matrix similar to latent fingerprints are collected more efficiently than dry particles. Applying greater force during swiping does not greatly improve collection efficiencies. This fact, coupled with the observation that many particles are detached but not collected, implies that improvements in collection efficiency are dependent on improvements in adhesion of the particles to the collection surface, rather than larger forces to detach the particles.

[1]  Robert S Ramotowski,et al.  Composition of Latent Print Residue , 2001 .

[2]  D. Donohue,et al.  Strengthening IAEA safeguards through environmental sampling and analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Kevin Cooper,et al.  Simulation of the Adhesion of Particles to Surfaces. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  J. Verkouteren,et al.  Particle Characteristics of Trace High Explosives: RDX and PETN * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Kellar Autumn,et al.  How Gecko Toes Stick , 2006 .

[6]  M. B. Ranade,et al.  Adhesion and Removal of Fine Particles on Surfaces , 1987 .

[7]  N. Pradeep,et al.  Quantification of the meniscus effect in adhesion force measurements , 2006 .

[8]  R. French Origins and Applications of London Dispersion Forces and Hamaker Constants in Ceramics , 2004 .

[9]  J. Kunze,et al.  Consistency and efficiency of standard swipe procedures taken on slightly radioactive contaminated metal surfaces. , 2001, Health physics.

[10]  Hwa-Chi Wang,et al.  Effects of Inceptive motion on particle detachment from surfaces , 1990 .

[11]  J. Visser,et al.  PARTICLE ADHESION AND REMOVAL: A REVIEW , 1995 .

[12]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Adhesion and stiction: Mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction , 2003 .

[13]  Garold L. Gresham,et al.  Development of particle standards for testing detection systems: mass of RDX and particle size distribution of composition 4 residues , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[14]  Xudong Xiao,et al.  Investigation of Humidity-Dependent Capillary Force , 2000 .

[15]  Montgomery,et al.  Analytical Dispersion Force Calculations for Nontraditional Geometries. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[16]  A. Busnaina,et al.  The Effect of Relative Humidity on Particle Adhesion and Removal , 2000 .

[17]  P. G. Leaney,et al.  Tennis ball fuzziness: assessing textile surface roughness using digital imaging , 2006 .

[18]  Ahmed Busnaina,et al.  The Effect of Time and Humidity on Particle Adhesion and Removal , 2000 .

[19]  Jan Fransaer,et al.  Fundamental study of the removal mechanisms of nano-sized particles using brush scrubber cleaning , 2005 .

[20]  Julie C. Patrick,et al.  Advancement of contraband drug detection through improved surface-sampling procedures , 1997, Defense + Security Symposium.

[21]  D. Rimai,et al.  Surface‐force‐induced deformations of monodisperse polystyrene spheres on planar silicon substrates , 1990 .

[22]  J. A. Stone,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Ion Mobility Spectrometers in National Defense , 2004 .

[23]  J. Fransaer,et al.  Particle adhesion and removal mechanisms during brush scrubber cleaning in post-CMP processes , 2004 .

[24]  S F Hallowell,et al.  Screening people for illicit substances: a survey of current portal technology. , 2001, Talanta.

[25]  M. Sigman,et al.  In-injection port thermal desorption for explosives trace evidence analysis. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  Stephen P. Beaudoin,et al.  Describing Hydrodynamic Particle Removal from Surfaces Using the Particle Reynolds Number , 2001 .