Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Wasifa Zarin | Adriani Nikolakopoulou | Anna Chaimani | Georgia Salanti | Andrea C Tricco | Patricia Rios | Matthias Egger | Maria Petropoulou | A. Tricco | M. Egger | G. Salanti | A. Chaimani | W. Zarin | A. Nikolakopoulou | A. Veroniki | A. Vafaei | Afshin Vafaei | Shannon M. Sullivan | Areti-Angeliki Veroniki | Myrsini Giannatsi | Shannon Sullivan | M. Petropoulou | Patricia Rios | Myrsini Giannatsi
[1] Ethan M Balk,et al. Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[2] Paula Williamson,et al. Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality , 2010, PloS one.
[3] D. Altman,et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[4] Dan Jackson,et al. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects , 2014, Statistics in medicine.
[5] Douglas G Altman,et al. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[6] Simon G Thompson,et al. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.
[7] Douglas G Altman,et al. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[8] Andrea Cipriani,et al. Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[9] Douglas G Altman,et al. Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[10] Catrin Tudur Smith,et al. Assessing key assumptions of network meta‐analysis: a review of methods , 2013, Research synthesis methods.
[11] G. Lu,et al. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons , 2006 .
[12] Nicky J Welton,et al. Automating network meta‐analysis , 2012, Research synthesis methods.
[13] Ian R. White,et al. Network Meta-analysis , 2015 .
[14] Anna Chaimani,et al. Using network meta‐analysis to evaluate the existence of small‐study effects in a network of interventions , 2012, Research synthesis methods.
[15] Christopher H. Schmid,et al. Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks , 2014, PloS one.
[16] Douglas G Altman,et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[17] J. Higgins,et al. Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair‐wise meta‐analysis , 2015, Research synthesis methods.
[18] L. Trinquart,et al. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[19] Nicky J Welton,et al. Network meta-analysis: a norm for comparative effectiveness? , 2015, The Lancet.
[20] S Dias,et al. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis , 2010, Statistics in medicine.
[21] J. McGowan,et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[22] D. Cox,et al. SOME QUICK SIGN TESTS FOR TREND IN LOCATION AND DISPERSION , 1955 .
[23] Dimitris Mavridis,et al. Publication bias and small-study effects magnified effectiveness of antipsychotics but their relative ranking remained invariant. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[24] A. Sutton,et al. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. , 2006, JAMA.
[25] Anna Chaimani,et al. Visualizing Assumptions and Results in Network Meta-analysis: The Network Graphs Package , 2015 .
[26] Alex J Sutton,et al. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[27] Kristian Thorlund,et al. The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[28] Gerta Rücker,et al. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[29] Dimitris Mavridis,et al. Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[30] Roger M. Harbord,et al. Updated Tests for Small-study Effects in Meta-analyses , 2009 .
[31] S D Walter,et al. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[32] Dimitris Mavridis,et al. A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta‐analysis , 2013, Statistics in medicine.
[33] Douglas G Altman,et al. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[34] J. Sterne,et al. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. , 2003, Health technology assessment.
[35] Julian P T Higgins,et al. Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.
[36] Dimitris Mavridis,et al. A primer on network meta-analysis with emphasis on mental health , 2015, Evidence-Based Mental Health.
[37] Georgia Salanti,et al. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[38] Deborah M Caldwell,et al. Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis , 2007, The Lancet.
[39] Nicky J Welton,et al. Effects of study precision and risk of bias in networks of interventions: a network meta-epidemiological study. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.
[40] Alex J Sutton,et al. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[41] Harald Binder,et al. A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[42] Tianjing Li,et al. Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed , 2011, BMC medicine.
[43] Huseyin Naci,et al. Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers , 2013, BMC Medicine.
[44] Deborah M Caldwell,et al. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomised Controlled Trials. , 2011 .
[45] Philippe Ravaud,et al. Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[46] Georgia Salanti,et al. Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool , 2012, Research synthesis methods.
[47] Joseph C Cappelleri,et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[48] Joseph C Cappelleri,et al. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[49] AE Ades,et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies‡ , 2012, Research synthesis methods.
[50] Andrew W Lee,et al. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[51] Alex J. Sutton,et al. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[52] Aaron N. Winn,et al. An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.
[53] S Duval,et al. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.
[54] Dan Jackson,et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression‡ , 2012, Research synthesis methods.
[55] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[56] Johannes B Reitsma,et al. GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology , 2016, Research synthesis methods.
[57] Philippe Ravaud,et al. Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review , 2013, BMJ.
[58] Julian P T Higgins,et al. Recent developments in meta‐analysis , 2008, Statistics in medicine.
[59] C. Begg,et al. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.
[60] Alex J. Sutton,et al. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 7 , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[61] K R Abrams,et al. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. , 2000, Statistical methods in medical research.
[62] Alex J. Sutton,et al. Publication and related biases: a review , 2000 .
[63] D. Kendrick,et al. An exploration of synthesis methods in public health evaluations of interventions concludes that the use of modern statistical methods would be beneficial. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[64] Christian Gluud,et al. Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[65] Panagiota Spyridonos,et al. Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA , 2013, PloS one.
[66] K A L'Abbé,et al. Meta-analysis in clinical research. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.
[67] Gerta Rücker,et al. Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods , 2015 .
[68] Alex J. Sutton,et al. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[69] Philippe Ravaud,et al. Adjustment for reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant trials , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[70] T. Lumley. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[71] D G Altman,et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. , 2005, Health technology assessment.