Material characterization at high strain rate by Hopkinson bar tests and finite element optimization

Abstract In the present work, dynamic tests have been performed on AISI 1018 CR steel specimens by means of a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). The standard SHPB arrangement has been modified in order to allow running tensile tests avoiding spurious and misleading effects due to wave dispersion, specimen inertia and mechanical impedance mismatch in the clamping region. However, engineering stress–strain curves obtained from experimental tests are far from representing true material properties because of several phenomena that must be taken into account: the strain rate is not constant during the test, the specimen undergoes remarkable necking, so stress and strain distributions are largely non-uniform, and the temperature increases because of plastic work. Experimental data have been post-processed using a finite element-based optimization procedure where the specimen dynamic deformation is reproduced. Optimal sets of material constants for different constitutive models (Johnson–Cook, Zerilli–Armstrong and others) have been computed by fitting, in a least mean square sense, the numerical and experimental load–displacement curves.

[1]  Amos Gilat,et al.  A direct-tension split Hopkinson bar for high strain-rate testing , 1991 .

[2]  D. A. Gorham,et al.  A numerical method for the correction of dispersion in pressure bar signals , 1983 .

[3]  T. Nicholas Tensile testing of materials at high rates of strain , 1981 .

[4]  Qingming Li,et al.  Correlation between the accuracy of a SHPB test and the stress uniformity based on numerical experiments , 2003 .

[5]  S. C. Hunter,et al.  The Dynamic Compression Testing of Solids by the Method of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1963 .

[6]  H. Kolsky An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at very High Rates of Loading , 1949 .

[7]  Herbert Kolsky,et al.  Stress Waves in Solids , 2003 .

[8]  Weinong W Chen,et al.  Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split hopkinson pressure bar , 2002 .

[9]  D. A. Gorham,et al.  The effect of specimen dimensions on high strain rate compression measurements of copper , 1991 .

[10]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Tensile Testing of Materials at Impact Rates of Strain , 1960 .

[11]  Jonas A. Zukas,et al.  High velocity impact dynamics , 1990 .

[12]  L. M. Yeakley,et al.  High strain-rate testing: Tension and compression , 1968 .

[13]  J. Lewis,et al.  The development and use of a torsional Hopkinson-bar apparatus , 1972 .

[14]  P. S. Follansbee,et al.  Wave Propagation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar , 1983 .

[15]  M. Meyers Dynamic Behavior of Materials , 1994 .

[16]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations , 1987 .

[17]  Richard W. Klopp,et al.  Pressure-shear impact and the dynamic viscoplastic response of metals , 1985 .

[18]  B. Hopkinson A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets , 1914 .