Feedback on Writing

The article first calls attention to research on learner strategies and to the significant role that verbal report data have played in such research. While various research methods have been used to describe such strategies, verbal report measures are being used more and more as a means for describing cognitive processes in such areas as communicating, translating, test taking, and language learning. The article focuses just on the use of verbal report in describing learner strategies in language learning and language using. It is noted that information on learner strategies has evolved from partially intuited lists of strategies to empirically derived taxonomies that have as their ultimate purpose that of training learners to be more successful at language learning. Second, the controversy regarding the use of verbal report measures is discussed. Finally, the article describes a study that employed a variety of verbal report measures in an effort to understand better the strategies that teachers use in giving feedback on compositions and the strategies that learners use in handling this feedback in the English-foreign-languge and Portuguese-native-language classrooms, respectively.

[1]  E. Boring.  A history of introspection. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Kenneth Goodman.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading: The reading process , 1988 .

[3]  Arnulfo G. Ramírez.  Language Learning Strategies Used by Adolescents Studying French in New York Schools , 1986 .

[4]  Lyle F. Bachman.  Performance on Cloze Tests with Fixed‐Ratio and Rational Deletions , 1985 .

[5]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Strategies in interlanguage communication , 1983 .

[6]  David J. Mendelsohn.  Student Needs: Cognitive as Well as Communicative , 1986 .

[7]  Anita L. Wenden,et al.  Incorporating learner training in the classroom , 1986 .

[8]  Nava Nevo.  Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension , 1989 .

[9]  A. Cohen,et al.  Second Language Writing: Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports , 1990 .

[10]  Yvonne Waern,et al.  Thoughts on text in context: Applying the think-aloud method to text processing , 1988 .

[11]  Peter Smagorinsky,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Protocol Analysis , 1989 .

[12]  Anita L. Wenden,et al.  What do Second-Language Learners Know about their Language Learning? A Second Look at Retrospective Accounts1 , 1986 .

[13]  Abigail Neubach,et al.  Processing Strategies and Problems Encountered in the Use of Dictionaries , 1988 .

[14]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[15]  D. Bakan.  A reconsideration of the problem of introspection. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Rocco P. Russo,et al.  LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY BEGINNING AND INTERMEDIATE ESL STUDENTS , 1985 .

[17]  Rebecca L. Oxford,et al.  Language Learning Strategies , 1990 .

[18]  Erwin R. Steinberg,et al.  Protocols, Retrospective Reports, and the Stream of Consciousness. , 1986 .

[19]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Giving and getting feedback on composition: A comparison of teacher and student verbal report , 1987 .

[20]  Peter P. Afflerbach,et al.  On the Use of Verbal Reports in Reading Research , 1984 .

[21]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  SOME USES OF MENTALISTIC DATA IN SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH1 , 1981 .

[22]  Barbara Kroll.  Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom. , 1990 .

[23]  D. A. Lieberman,et al.  Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to introspection. , 1979 .

[24]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Introspection in second language research , 1989 .

[25]  L. Corno,et al.  Effects on Second Language Learning of Variations in Written Feedback on Homework Assignments , 1981 .

[26]  Vivian Zamel.  Responding to Student Writing , 1985 .

[27]  A. Wenden,et al.  Learner strategies in language learning , 1990 .

[28]  K. Anders Ericsson,et al.  Concurrent verbal reports on text comprehension: A review , 1988 .

[29]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Language Learning: Insights for Learners, Teachers, and Researchers , 1990 .

[30]  David N. Dobrin.  Protocols Once More. , 1986 .

[31]  J. Charles Alderson,et al.  Reading in a Foreign Language , 1984 .

[32]  Joan Rubin,et al.  Study of Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learning1 , 1981 .

[33]  George Hillocks,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. , 1986 .

[34]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  On taking language tests , 1984 .

[35]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Toward Assessing Interlanguage Performance: The Relationship between Selected Errors, Learners' Characteristics, and Learners' Explanations. , 1976 .

[36]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[37]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading , 1988 .

[38]  John Radford,et al.  Reflections on introspection. , 1974 .

[39]  H. Stern,et al.  What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner , 1975 .

[40]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[41]  A. Cohen.  Testing language ability in the classroom , 1981 .

[42]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  Learning strategies in second language acquisition , 1990 .

[43]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Easifying second language learning , 1981, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[44]  Robert J. Marzano,et al.  Teacher Comments on Student Essays: It Doesn't Matter What You Say. , 1977 .

[45]  John F. Fanselow.  Beyond Rashomon: Conceptualizing and Describing the Teaching Act , 1977 .

[46]  Herbert W. Seliger.  The Language Learner as Linguist: Of Metaphors and Realities , 1983 .

[47]  W. Lyons.  The disappearance of introspection , 1989 .

[48]  J. Rubin.  WHAT THE GOOD LANGUAGE LEARNER CAN TEACH US , 1975 .

[49]  Ken Willing.  Teaching how to learn : learning strategies in ESL , 1989 .

[50]  Ellen L. Block.  The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language Readers , 1986 .

[51]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .