Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Direct electrical stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) by cochlear implants (CIs) enables open speech comprehension in the majority of implanted deaf subjects(1-) (6). Nonetheless, sound coding with current CIs has poor frequency and intensity resolution due to broad current spread from each electrode contact activating a large number of SGNs along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea(7-) (9). Optical stimulation is proposed as an alternative to electrical stimulation that promises spatially more confined activation of SGNs and, hence, higher frequency resolution of coding. In recent years, direct infrared illumination of the cochlea has been used to evoke responses in the auditory nerve(10). Nevertheless it requires higher energies than electrical stimulation(10,11) and uncertainty remains as to the underlying mechanism(12). Here we describe a method based on optogenetics to stimulate SGNs with low intensity blue light, using transgenic mice with neuronal expression of channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2)(13) or virus-mediated expression of the ChR2-variant CatCh(14). We used micro-light emitting diodes (µLEDs) and fiber-coupled lasers to stimulate ChR2-expressing SGNs through a small artificial opening (cochleostomy) or the round window. We assayed the responses by scalp recordings of light-evoked potentials (optogenetic auditory brainstem response: oABR) or by microelectrode recordings from the auditory pathway and compared them with acoustic and electrical stimulation.

[1]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus , 2014, Hearing Research.

[2]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[3]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  G. Clark.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people—a personal perspective , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Hideaki E. Kato,et al.  Crystal structure of the channelrhodopsin light-gated cation channel , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[7]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Cochlear implants: the view from the brain , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsins: directly light-gated cation channels. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[9]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[10]  Ernst Bamberg,et al.  Spectral characteristics of the photocycle of channelrhodopsin-2 and its implication for channel function. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  W. C. Hall,et al.  High-speed mapping of synaptic connectivity using photostimulation in Channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  G. Nagel,et al.  From channelrhodopsins to optogenetics , 2013, EMBO molecular medicine.

[13]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Selectivity of neural stimulation in the auditory system: a comparison of optic and electric stimuli. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.

[16]  J. Rubinstein.  Paediatric cochlear implantation: prosthetic hearing and language development , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Peter Hegemann,et al.  Monitoring Light-induced Structural Changes of Channelrhodopsin-2 by UV-visible and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Andreas Möglich,et al.  Channelrhodopsin engineering and exploration of new optogenetic tools , 2011, Nature Methods.

[20]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A toolbox of Cre-dependent optogenetic transgenic mice for light-induced activation and silencing , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context , 2012, Hearing Research.

[22]  C. Richter,et al.  Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  Peter Hegemann,et al.  Two open states with progressive proton selectivities in the branched channelrhodopsin-2 photocycle. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[25]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway. , 2014, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[26]  M. Häusser,et al.  Targeting neurons and photons for optogenetics , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  The development and application of optogenetics. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Ultra light-sensitive and fast neuronal activation with the Ca2+-permeable channelrhodopsin CatCh , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins , 2011, Nature Methods.

[31]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Acoustic Events and “Optophonic” Cochlear Responses Induced by Pulsed Near-Infrared LASER , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Light Activation of Channelrhodopsin-2 in Excitable Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans Triggers Rapid Behavioral Responses , 2005, Current Biology.

[34]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Ultrafast optogenetic control , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetics in Neural Systems , 2011, Neuron.

[37]  D. Moore,et al.  Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Independent Optical Excitation of Distinct Neural Populations , 2014, Nature Methods.

[40]  Benjamin R. Arenkiel,et al.  In Vivo Light-Induced Activation of Neural Circuitry in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 , 2007, Neuron.

[41]  HighWire Press.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.