Relationships between Soil Morphology and Soil Properties Relevant to Irrigated and Dryland Agriculture

A number of morphological attributes are commonly assumed to serve as surrogates for properties that cannot be practically measured on a routine basis This study investigates whether conventional soil morphology can be used for predicting soil properties of relevance to irrigated and dryland agriculture in the lower Macquarie Valley, N S W Measurements from 224 profiles were used to develop regression equations with morphological properties as explanatory variables Response variables included gravimetric moisture contents at -10 and -1500 kPa, available water capacity, ail-filled porosity, ESP, dispersion index, the coefficient of linear extensibility, bulk density and CEC The relationships between field texture and particle size classes were also determined Conventional sod morphology provided only moderate predictions of the agronomically more important properties In the lower Macquarie Valley, texture and colour were the most useful explanatory variables Most of the remaining morphological properties, and in particular conventional descriptors of structure, contributed little to improving prediction Options for more cost-effective and direct measurements, especially of profile macrostructure are considered.

[1]  I. White,et al.  Designs for disc permeameters , 1988 .

[2]  C. Shaykewich,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOIL PHYSICAL CONSTANTS AND SOIL PHYSICAL COMPONENTS OF SOME MANITOBA SOILS , 1968 .

[3]  Astrid M. Lambooy.  Relationship between cation exchange capacity, clay content and water retention of Highveld soils , 1984 .

[4]  Keith H. Northcote,et al.  A factual key for the recognition of Australian soils , 1971 .

[5]  W. D. Nettleton,et al.  Correlation of Clay Minerals and Properties of Soils in the Western United States1 , 1983 .

[6]  J. B. Williams,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TEXTURE ON THE MOISTURE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS , 1966 .

[7]  S. P. PERIASWAMY,et al.  ESTIMATING AVAILABLE WATER‐HOLDING CAPACITY OF WESTERN NIGERIAN SOILS FROM SOIL TEXTURE AND BULK DENSITY, USING CORE AND SIEVED SAMPLES , 1985 .

[8]  J. Bouma.  Use of soil survey data to select measurement techniques for hydraulic conductivity , 1983 .

[9]  R. C. Palmer,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FIELD ESTIMATES AND LABORATORY ANALYSES OF THE SILT AND CLAY CONTENTS OF SOME WEST MIDLAND SOILS , 1976 .

[10]  G. Topp,et al.  COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED AND MEASURED HORIZONTAL Ksat VALUES , 1985 .

[11]  J. E. Foss,et al.  Testing the Accuracy of Field Textures 1 , 1975 .

[12]  D. Goodall,et al.  The relative unimportance of certain soil properties as dererminants of growth of forage oats , 1966 .

[13]  Brian E. Butler,et al.  Soil Classification for Soil Survey , 1980 .

[14]  D. P. Franzmeier,et al.  Linear Extensibility as Calculated from Natural‐Clod Bulk Density Measurements , 1968 .

[15]  D. P. Franzmeier,et al.  Use of Saran Resin to Coat Natural Soil Clods for Bulk-Density and Water-Retention Measurements , 1966 .

[16]  R. G. Eilers,et al.  Tentative assessment of soil survey approaches to the characterization and interpretation of air-water properties of soils , 1984 .

[17]  J. B. Williams,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TEXTURE ON THE MOISTURE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS: IV. A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE AVAILABLE-WATER CAPACITIES OF PROFILES IN THE FIELD , 1967 .

[18]  Jack F. Paris,et al.  A Physicoempirical Model to Predict the Soil Moisture Characteristic from Particle-Size Distribution and Bulk Density Data 1 , 1981 .

[19]  John Michael Hodgson,et al.  Soil Sampling and Soil Description , 1978 .

[20]  J. Mckeague.  Estimating Air Porosity and Available Water Capacity from Soil Morphology1 , 1987 .

[21]  Z. F. Lund.  Available Water‐Holding Capacity of Alluvial Soils in Louisiana , 1959 .

[22]  W. E. Larson,et al.  Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density , 1979 .

[23]  W. K. Mason,et al.  Effects of irrigation and soil management for fodder crops on root zone conditions in a red-brown earth , 1984 .

[24]  G. Topp,et al.  Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity from Soil Morphology , 1982 .

[25]  Richard Webster,et al.  Soil classification and survey studies at Ginninderra , 1976 .

[26]  J. Walker,et al.  Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook , 1984 .

[27]  A. Thomasson,et al.  Water Retention, Porosity and Density of Field Soils , 1977 .

[28]  M. Reeve.  Water retention, porosity, and composition inter-relationships of alluvial soils in mid Hawke's Bay and their relevance in irrigation planning , 1986 .

[29]  I. Shainberg,et al.  The effect of lime on the response of soils to sodic conditions , 1982 .

[30]  G. W. Petersen,et al.  Moisture characteristics of Pennsylvania soils; [Part] 1, Moisture retention as related to texture , 1968 .

[31]  B. Tucker.  LABORATORY PROCEDURES FOR CATION EXCHANGE MEASUREMENTS ON SOILS , 1974 .

[32]  Scotter,et al.  Water entry, water use and seasonal-moisture regimes in flood-irrigated Riverina soils , 1966 .

[33]  D. K. Cassel,et al.  Field‐Measured Limits of Soil Water Availability as Related to Laboratory‐Measured Properties , 1983 .