Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches

Wearable devices indicate objects encompassing both mobile computing and fashion characteristics. Although the combination of the two characteristics is relatively new, consumers' recognition of smartwatches, one type of wearable, is increasing. However, despite the heightened interest in smartwatches, sales are growing more slowly than expected. In order to comprehend this, we should understand potential consumers' perceptions of smartwatches. This study explored how much potential consumers value various smartwatch attributes by examining their preference structure of the wearable. The preference structure was generated from a conjoint analysis including five smartwatch attributes: brand, price, standalone communication, display shape, and display size. We also compared findings by user group (current wristwatch users vs. non-users). Results showed that display shape and standalone communication are more critical factors influencing respondents' smartwatch choices than brand and price for both types of users. Results also revealed that a curved display shape is most preferred. Consumers' recognition of smartwatches, one type of wearable, is increasing.Smartwatch functions are more important to users than brand and price.Display shape and standalone communication are more critical functions.A curved display shape is most preferred.

[1]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[2]  Kris Sangani Inner voice [Information Technology Voice Recognition] , 2013 .

[3]  Choy-Har Wong,et al.  Mobile shopping: the next frontier of the shopping industry? An emerging market perspective , 2014, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[4]  S. Addelman Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments , 1962 .

[5]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[6]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  Response to potential information technology risk: Users' valuation of electromagnetic field from mobile phones , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[7]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[8]  Ying-Hueih Chen,et al.  Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Steve Mann,et al.  Wearable Computing: A First Step Toward Personal Imaging , 1997, Computer.

[10]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[11]  J. Salo,et al.  Factors Affecting Consumer Choice of Mobile Phones: Two Studies from Finland , 2005 .

[12]  Yoonhyuk Jung,et al.  Students' evaluation of learning management systems in the personal computer and smartphone computing environments , 2014, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[13]  Gilsoo Cho,et al.  Review and Reappraisal of Smart Clothing , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Steve Mann,et al.  Smart clothing: the shift to wearable computing , 1996, CACM.

[15]  D Roggen,et al.  Wearable Computing , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[16]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[17]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Wearables: has the age of smartwatches finally arrived? , 2015, Commun. ACM.

[18]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables , 2000 .

[19]  Kris Sangani Is this a wind up , 2013 .