Lewis–Mogridge Points: A Nonarbitrary Method to Include Induced Traffic in Cost-Benefit Analyses

We propose a new method to estimate benefits of road network improvements, which allows to include the induced demand without arbitrary assumptions. Instead of estimating induced demand (which is nontrivial and hardly possible in practice), we search for demand induction where initial benefits are mitigated to zero. Such approach allows to formulate a dual measure of benefit, covering both the potential benefits and the likelihood of consuming them by the induced traffic. We first estimate benefits of road network improvement assuming that traffic demand is fixed. Consequently, we find demand model configurations at which the benefits of the new investment become null, i.e., all the initial benefits are consumed by the traffic demand growth. We call such states of induced demand the Lewis–Mogridge points of the analysed improvement. We select the most probable of such points and use it to calculate the proposed novel indicator μ, for which the initial benefits (obtained under a fixed-demand assumption) are multiplied with a demand increase rate needed to consume them. We believe that such measure allows to include the critical phenomena of induced traffic and, at the same time, to overcome problems associated with reliable estimation of induced demand. As we illustrate with the case of two alternative road improvement schemes in Krakow, Poland, the proposed method allows to estimate maximal threshold of induced traffic and to select scenario more resilient to induced traffic.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  A. Downs Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion , 1992 .

[3]  Meng Zhou,et al.  Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change? , 2018 .

[4]  David T Hartgen,et al.  Relieving Congestion by Adding Road Capacity and Tolling , 2009 .

[5]  J. M. Thomson,et al.  Great cities and their traffic , 1977 .

[6]  Todd Litman,et al.  Generated Traffic and Induced Travel , 2013 .

[7]  Phil. Goodwin,et al.  Empirical evidence on induced traffic , 1996 .

[8]  Adam Rose,et al.  The Impact of High-Speed Rail Investment on Economic and Environmental Change in China: A Dynamic CGE Analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Michael A. Niedzielski,et al.  Impact of commuting, time budgets, and activity durations on modal disparity in accessibility to supermarkets , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[10]  Guido Gentile,et al.  The General Link Transmission Model for Dynamic Network Loading and a Comparison with the DUE Algorithm , 2010 .

[11]  Arkadiusz Drabicki,et al.  Estimating Macroscopic Volume Delay Functions with the Traffic Density Derived from Measured Speeds and Flows , 2017 .

[12]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Transport Planning and Environmental Assessment: Implications of Induced Travel Effects , 2007 .

[13]  R. Noland Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel , 2001 .

[14]  T. Kuhnimhof,et al.  Does context matter? A comparative study modelling autonomous vehicle impact on travel behaviour for Germany and the USA , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[15]  R. Hickman,et al.  Planning more for sustainable mobility , 2013 .

[16]  Maxime Lenormand,et al.  Systematic comparison of trip distribution laws and models , 2015, 1506.04889.

[17]  M. J. H. Mogridge,et al.  Travel in Towns: Jam yesterday, jam today and jam tomorrow? , 1990 .

[18]  Daniel J. Graham,et al.  Road Traffic Demand Elasticity Estimates: A Review , 2004 .

[19]  Shaopeng Zhong,et al.  Impact of the built environment on the vehicle emission effects of road pricing policies: A simulation case study , 2017 .

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[21]  Domokos Esztergár-Kiss System architecture of the activity chain optimization application , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[22]  M. Mogridge,et al.  The self-defeating nature of urban road capacity policy: A review of theories, disputes and available evidence , 1997 .

[24]  Pierluigi Coppola,et al.  High Speed Rail (HSR) induced demand models , 2014 .

[25]  C. Chorus,et al.  From user equilibrium to system optimum: a literature review on the role of travel information, bounded rationality and non-selfish behaviour at the network and individual levels , 2016 .

[26]  H C Williams,et al.  Travel demand forecasts and the evaluation of highway schemes under congested conditions , 1992 .

[27]  Rosa Marina González,et al.  Induced road traffic in Spanish regions: A dynamic panel data model , 2012 .

[28]  Kwang Sik Kim,et al.  The Contribution of Suppressed and Induced Traffic in Highway Appraisal, Part 2: Policy Tests , 2001 .

[29]  A Downs,et al.  THE LAW OF PEAK-HOUR EXPRESSWAY CONGESTION , 1962 .

[30]  J. G. Wardrop,et al.  Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research , 1952 .

[31]  W Davies What effect do Queensland's major road infrastructure projects have on traffic volumes and growth rates? , 2015 .

[32]  Peter Bonsall Can induced traffic be measured by surveys? , 1996 .

[33]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Real-time trip purpose prediction using online location-based search and discovery services , 2017 .

[34]  Peter Mackie,et al.  Induced traffic and economic appraisal , 1996 .

[35]  J. Wardrop ROAD PAPER. SOME THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC RESEARCH. , 1952 .

[36]  Arvid Strand,et al.  Traffic Forecasts Ignoring Induced Demand: a Shaky Fundament for Cost-Benefit Analyses , 2012 .

[37]  M. Roorda,et al.  Impact of hourly parking pricing on travel demand , 2017 .

[38]  Denvil Coombe,et al.  Induced traffic: what do transportation models tell us? , 1996 .

[39]  Hcwl Williams THE APPRAISAL OF HIGHWAY INVESTMENTS UNDER FIXED AND VARIABLE DEMAND , 1990 .