Fluid management for critical patients undergoing urgent colectomy.

RATIONALE The present study aimed to define thresholds for perioperative fluids and weight gain after urgent colectomies. METHOD Consecutive urgent colonic resections within an enhanced recovery pathway (2011-2017) were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, stratified as overall (I-V) and major (IIIb-V) according to Clavien scale. Fluid-management-related thresholds were identified through receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Outcomes were compared for patients above vs below threshold, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for overall complications. RESULTS Overall, complications were observed in 133 out of 224 patients (59%), severe complications in 43 patients (19%). For overall complications, area under ROC (AUROC) was 0.71, identifying a critical cut-off of 3 L of total IV fluid administration at the day of surgery (negative predictive value [NPV]: 90%). Further, a critical cut-off for postoperative weight gain of 2.3 kg at postoperative day (POD) 2 was identified (AUROC 0.7, NPV 92%). Multivariable analysis identified fluid administration of >3 L (OR 5.33; 95% CI, 2.36-12.02) and weight gain of >2.3 kg at POD 2 (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.13-5.53) as independent predictors for overall complications. Median length of stay was 7 (5-10) days in patients receiving <3 L at POD 0 and 13 (9-19) days in patients receiving >3 L (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Fluid administration of 3 L at the day of surgery and weight gain of 2.3 kg at POD 2 may represent critical thresholds for adverse outcomes after urgent colectomy. The suggested thresholds need to be confirmed through independent validation.

[1]  J. H. van der Meulen,et al.  Role of Emergency Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study in England. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[2]  N. Demartines,et al.  Thresholds for optimal fluid administration and weight gain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery , 2019, BJS open.

[3]  N. Demartines,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine optimal fluid management during open colorectal surgery , 2018, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[4]  B. Schneider,et al.  Elective vs. early elective surgery in diverticular disease: a retrospective study on the optimal timing of non-emergency treatment , 2018, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[5]  Young Hun Kim,et al.  Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Who Underwent Emergency Colorectal Surgery , 2017, Annals of coloproctology.

[6]  P. Kipnis,et al.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Implementation in 2 Surgical Populations in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[7]  N. Demartines,et al.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Can We Rely on the Key Factors or Do We Need the Bel Ensemble? , 2017, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  N. Demartines,et al.  Postoperative ileus in an enhanced recovery pathway—a retrospective cohort study , 2017, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[9]  N. Demartines,et al.  Enhanced recovery ERAS for elderly: a safe and beneficial pathway in colorectal surgery , 2017, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[10]  Karen L. Barclay,et al.  Effects of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme on emergency surgical patients , 2016, ANZ journal of surgery.

[11]  D. Lobo,et al.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on perioperative fluid management within an enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery , 2016, Perioperative Medicine.

[12]  K. Kim,et al.  Outcomes and Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Colorectal Emergency Surgery , 2016, Annals of coloproctology.

[13]  S. McCluskey,et al.  Greater intravenous fluid volumes are associated with prolonged recovery after colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  D. Lobo,et al.  Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Therapy in Elective Major Abdominal Surgery , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[15]  T. Gan,et al.  Peri‐operative fluid management to enhance recovery , 2016, Anaesthesia.

[16]  Y. Kim,et al.  Outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer in the emergency setting. , 2015, In vivo.

[17]  N. Demartines,et al.  Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Urgent Colectomy , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[18]  K. Fearon,et al.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colonic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations , 2013, World Journal of Surgery.

[19]  D J Buggy,et al.  Intraoperative fluids: how much is too much? , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. , 2011, Archives of surgery.

[21]  W. Bemelman,et al.  Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre randomised trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  S. Wootton,et al.  Improving peri-operative fluid management in a large teaching hospital: pragmatic studies on the effects of changing practice , 2010, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[23]  M. Giglio,et al.  Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[24]  Stuart M Phillips,et al.  Emergency laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease , 2009, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[25]  R. Audisio,et al.  Colorectal cancer presenting as surgical emergencies. , 2004, Surgical oncology.

[26]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.