39. Verb classes within and across languages

Any attempt to characterize valency patterns within and across languages confronts the phenomenon of verb or valency classes: sets of semantically-related verbs sharing a range of linguistic properties, such as the possible realizations of their arguments and the particular interpretation associated with each possible argument realization. The Leipzig Valency Classes Project provides an excellent context for deepening our understanding of verb classes and, specifically, investigating a big question raised by efforts to classify verbs: which facets of verb classification are universal and which language particular? I begin this paper by reviewing the motivations for recognizing verb classes. With this background, I introduce a broad semantic dichotomy that encompasses many existing verb classes and show its grammatical relevance. I then consider its implications for crosslinguistic studies of verb classes, such as the ones that are being carried out by the Valency Classes Project, through a case study of the argument realization options of hitting verbs.

[1]  Meesook Kim.  A CROSS-LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE ACQUISITION OF LOCATIVE VERBS , 1999 .

[2]  John Beavers,et al.  Scalar complexity and the structure of events , 2008 .

[3]  F.H.H. Kortlandt.  Eksperimental'noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola: Ju. D. Apresjan Izd. ‘Nauka’, Moskva 1967, 248 pages , 1971 .

[4]  Paula Cifuentes Férez,et al.  Human locomotion verbs in english and spanish , 2007 .

[5]  Esther Schindler,et al.  A manner of speaking , 2004, NTWK.

[6]  R. Washio,et al.  Resultatives, Compositionality and Language Variation , 1997 .

[7]  Tsunoda Tasaku.  Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood , 1981 .

[8]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition , 2006 .

[9]  M. Shibatani,et al.  The languages of Japan , 1991 .

[10]  J. Baptista.  Instrument Nouns and Fusion: Predicative nouns designating violent actions , 2004 .

[11]  Robert M. Dixon,et al.  A new approach to Eng-lish Grammar on semantic principles , 1991 .

[12]  Paula Cifuentes-Férez.  A crosslinguistic study on the semantics of motion verbs in English and Spanish , 2009 .

[13]  Gohsran Chung,et al.  Une classe de verbes transitifs en coréen: Verbes de Contact-Corporel , 2003 .

[14]  Andrej Malchukov.  Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: constraining co-variation , 2006 .

[15]  Verbal alternations in Akan , 2008 .

[16]  Edge-Based Clausal Syntax: A Study of (Mostly) English Object Structure , 2010 .

[17]  Neville Ryant,et al.  A large-scale classification of English verbs , 2008, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[18]  Malka Rappaport Hovav.  Building scalar changes , 2014 .

[19]  B. Levin,et al.  Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in "Degree Achievements" , 1999 .

[20]  Carol Lee Tenny,et al.  Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface , 1994 .

[21]  P. Kroeger.  The Grammar of hitting, breaking, and cutting in Kimaragang Dusun , 2010 .

[22]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  A view from the middle , 1987 .

[23]  Cliff Goddard.  Verb classes and valency alternations (NSM approach), with special reference to English physical activity verbs , 2015 .

[24]  C. Iacobini.  The number and use of manner verbs as a cue for typological change in the strategies of motion events encoding , 2010 .

[25]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[26]  W. Bruce Croft.  Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations , 1990 .

[27]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations , 1993 .

[28]  Iraide Ibarretxe Antuñano.  TTIPI-TTAPA TTIPI-TTAPA… KORRIKA!!! MOTION AND SOUND SYMBOLISM IN BASQUE* , 2006 .

[29]  Georgia M. Green,et al.  Semantics and Syntactic Regularity , 1974 .

[30]  E. Palancar.  What do we give in Spanish when we hit? A constructionist account of hitting expressions , 1999 .

[31]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[32]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  On Relational Meaning: The Acquisition of Verb Meaning. Technical Report No. 78. , 1977 .

[33]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events , 2004 .

[34]  Götz Wienold,et al.  Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space , 1995 .

[35]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Microparameters of Cross-LinguisticVariation: Directed Motion and Resultatives , 2008 .

[36]  김두식,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations , 2006 .

[37]  Josef Ruppenhofer,et al.  FrameNet's Frames vs. Levin's Verb Classes , 2002 .

[38]  Jeffrey Gruber,et al.  Look and See , 1967 .

[39]  Åke Viberg.  Physical contact verbs in English and Swedish from the perspective of crosslinguistic lexicology , 2004 .

[40]  P. D. Swart.  Prepositional inanimates in Dutch: A case of paradigmatic DOM , 2014 .

[41]  T. Tsunoda.  Remarks on transitivity , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.

[42]  C. Iacobini,et al.  The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings , 2007 .

[43]  D. Shi.  Communication verbs in Chinese and English: A contrastive analysis , 2008 .

[44]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure , 1997 .

[45]  Ray Jackendoff.  Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[46]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration , 1991, Cognition.

[47]  Myfany Turpin,et al.  Language description informed by theory , 2014 .

[48]  Filippo-Enrico Cardini.  Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian , 2008 .

[49]  Anita Mittwoch,et al.  Unspecified Arguments in Episodic and Habitual Sentences , 2005 .

[50]  Natsuko Tsujimura,et al.  An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics , 1997 .

[51]  C. Fillmore.  The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[52]  Beth Levin,et al.  Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity* , 2010 .

[53]  Beth Levin,et al.  Change of State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection , 2002 .

[54]  J. Nichols,et al.  Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages , 2004 .

[55]  Alan Robert Vogel,et al.  JARAWARA VERB CLASSES , 2004 .

[56]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Verbs, Constructions, and Semantic Frames , 2010 .

[57]  Beth Levin,et al.  The typology of motion expressions revisited1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[58]  A. Malchukov.  Case Pattern Splits, Verb Types and Construction Competition , 2005 .

[59]  D. Slobin.  Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism , 2000 .

[60]  J. Maling.  Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles , 2001 .

[61]  Hoa Pham,et al.  Cognate objects in Vietnamese transitive verbs , 1999 .

[62]  Ricardo Mairal Usón,et al.  Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs , 1999 .

[63]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives , 2001 .

[64]  M. W. Epro,et al.  Syntaxe, lexique et semantique: Les Constructions Verbales , 1983 .

[65]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[66]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity1 , 2008, Journal of Linguistics.

[67]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted:the role of information structure in argument distribution , 2001 .

[68]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[69]  Beth Levin,et al.  Argument Realization , 2005 .

[70]  Robert D. Van Valin,et al.  Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar , 1984 .

[71]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  "They whispered me the answer" in Australia and the US: A comparative experimental study , 2013 .

[72]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[73]  Richard Hudson,et al.  SO-CALLED 'DOUBLE OBJECTS' AND GRAMMATICAL RELATIONS , 1992 .

[74]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Talking About Walking , 2008, Psychological science.

[75]  J. Nichols.  Ingush Transitivization and Detransitivization , 1982 .

[76]  William McClure,et al.  Syntactic projections of the semantics of aspect , 1994 .

[77]  Andrew Koontz-Garboden,et al.  The lexical semantics of derived statives , 2010 .

[78]  Andrew J Koontz-Garboden.  Ulwa Verb Class Morphology , 2009, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[79]  Yo Matsumoto,et al.  Typologies of Lexicalization Patterns and Event Integration:Clarifications and Reformulations , 2003 .

[80]  Jeffrey Gruber.  Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[81]  Yukiko Sugiyama.  Not All Verb-Framed Languages are Created Equal: The Case of Japanese , 2005 .

[82]  A. Marantz.  Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions , 1993 .

[83]  Andrej L. Malchukov,et al.  Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking , 2008 .

[84]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Contact, animacy, and affectedness in Germanic , 2012 .

[85]  H. Boas.  Towards a frame-constructional approach to verb classification , 2008 .

[86]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions, Lexical Semantics, and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for Generalizations and Subregularities in the Realization of Arguments , 2010 .

[87]  D. Gerdts,et al.  Mapping Halkomelem grammatical relations , 1993 .

[88]  Andrew Koontz-Garboden,et al.  Manner and Result in the Roots of Verbal Meaning , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[89]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Wiping the Slate Clean , 2011 .

[90]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[91]  William Snyder,et al.  On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation , 2001 .

[92]  Seppo Kittilä,et al.  The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity , 2006 .

[93]  Beth Levin,et al.  Objecthood: An event structure perspective , 1999 .

[94]  A. Alexiadou,et al.  The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax , 2014 .

[95]  Jack Feuillet,et al.  Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues d'Europe , 1998 .

[96]  Jürgen Bohnemeyer,et al.  Morpholexical Transparency and the argument structure of verbs of cutting and breaking , 2007 .

[97]  Beth Levin,et al.  Lexicalized Meaning and Manner/Result Complementarity , 2013 .

[98]  D. Slobin.  How people move: Discourse effects of linguistic typology , 2004 .

[99]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[100]  Beth Levin,et al.  Dative verbs: A crosslinguistic perspective , 2008 .

[101]  A. Wierzbicka.  Case marking and human nature , 1981 .