Stroke Volume estimation using aortic pressure measurements and aortic cross sectional area: Proof of concept

Accurate Stroke Volume (SV) monitoring is essential for patient with cardiovascular dysfunction patients. However, direct SV measurements are not clinically feasible due to the highly invasive nature of measurement devices. Current devices for indirect monitoring of SV are shown to be inaccurate during sudden hemodynamic changes. This paper presents a novel SV estimation using readily available aortic pressure measurements and aortic cross sectional area, using data from a porcine experiment where medical interventions such as fluid replacement, dobutamine infusions, and recruitment maneuvers induced SV changes in a pig with circulatory shock. Measurement of left ventricular volume, proximal aortic pressure, and descending aortic pressure waveforms were made simultaneously during the experiment. From measured data, proximal aortic pressure was separated into reservoir and excess pressures. Beat-to-beat aortic characteristic impedance values were calculated using both aortic pressure measurements and an estimate of the aortic cross sectional area. SV was estimated using the calculated aortic characteristic impedance and excess component of the proximal aorta. The median difference between directly measured SV and estimated SV was -1.4ml with 95% limit of agreement +/- 6.6ml. This method demonstrates that SV can be accurately captured beat-to-beat during sudden changes in hemodynamic state. This novel SV estimation could enable improved cardiac and circulatory treatment in the critical care environment by titrating treatment to the effect on SV.

[1]  Bram W. Smith,et al.  Does a positive end‐expiratory pressure‐induced reduction in stroke volume indicate preload responsiveness? An experimental study , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  K. Parker,et al.  Determination of wave speed and wave separation in the arteries. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Nigel G Shrive,et al.  Time-domain representation of ventricular-arterial coupling as a windkessel and wave system. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  Geoffrey M. Shaw,et al.  Continuous Stroke Volume Estimation from Aortic Pressure Using Zero Dimensional Cardiovascular Model: Proof of Concept Study from Porcine Experiments , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  M. Levy,et al.  Hemodynamic monitoring in sepsis. , 2011, Critical care nursing clinics of North America.

[6]  M. Cecconi,et al.  Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective , 2011, Critical care.

[7]  M. Jerosch-Herold,et al.  Normal values of aortic dimensions, distensibility, and pulse wave velocity in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[8]  Timothy J Ellender,et al.  The use of vasopressors and inotropes in the emergency medical treatment of shock. , 2008, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[9]  S. Tibby,et al.  Monitoring cardiac function in intensive care , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood.

[10]  R. Beale,et al.  Pitfalls in haemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform , 2010, Critical care.

[11]  Paolo Pelosi,et al.  Clinical review: Positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output , 2005, Critical care.

[12]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Dimensions and mechanical properties of porcine aortic segments determined by combined impedance planimetry and high-frequency ultrasound , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  P. Marik Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy: HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS TO GUIDE FLUID THERAPY , 2010 .