Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words

In two studies, participants studied 30 lists of 50 words and were tested on 30 lists of 100 words. Item-level multiple regression analyses were conducted on hits, false alarms, hits minus false alarms, d′, and C. The predictor variables were objective frequency, subjective frequency, imageability, orthographic similarity, phonological similarity, phonological-to-orthographic N (PON), age of acquisition (AoA), and word length. The regression equations accounted for 45.9% of the variance in hit rates, 14.9% of the variance in false alarm rates, and 29.2% of the variance in hits minus false alarms. Other noteworthy results were that: (a) hit rates positively correlated with false alarms, (b) objective frequency negatively correlated with both hit rates and false alarm rates, (c) AoA positively correlated with hit rates and negatively correlated with false alarm rates, (d) length negatively correlated with hit rates and positively correlated with false alarm rates, (e) orthographic uniqueness was positively correlated with hit rates and negatively correlated with false alarms, (f) PON positively correlated with false alarm rates, (g) imageability produced the typical mirror pattern, and (h) imageability and length were the strongest predictors of performance. Results were largely compatible with predictions made by single- and dual-process theories of recognition memory.

[1]  Gina A. Glanc,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[2]  False recognition and word length: A reanalysis of Roediger, Watson, McDermott, and Gallo (2001) and some new data , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  V. Coltheart,et al.  Word imagery but not age of acquisition affects episodic memory , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[5]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[6]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  The distinctiveness of the word-length effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  David C. Rubin,et al.  51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior , 1980 .

[8]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[9]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect , 1994 .

[10]  G. Hitch,et al.  Separate effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall. , 1998 .

[11]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[12]  D C Rubin,et al.  Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[13]  David A. Balota,et al.  Pathway control in visual word processing: Converging evidence from recognition memory , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[16]  A. Cutler Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[17]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks , 1979 .

[18]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[20]  D. Balota,et al.  Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[23]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[24]  Relating distinctive orthographic and phonological processes to episodic memory performance , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Peter E. Morr Age of acquisition, imagery, recall, and the limitations of multiple-regression analysis , 1981 .

[27]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[28]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[29]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in Young, Old, and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Two Processes in Episodic Recognition Performance , 2002 .

[31]  K I Forster,et al.  The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[33]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[34]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  R. Greene Recognition memory for pseudowords , 2004 .

[36]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[37]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.