Comparison of axial flux machine performance with different rotor and stator configurations

Axial flux machines (AFMs) are used in applications that require high power and torque densities in a pancake-type form factor. There are various types of AFMs based on the configuration of the rotor/stator and magnet orientation. In this paper, a comprehensive analysis and comparison of AFMs with different rotor and stator configurations are presented. Considered topologies are: slotted AFMs with single stator single rotor (SSSR), double stator single rotor (DSSR) and single stator double rotors (SSDR). The effect of magnet orientations such as interior permanent magnet or surface permanent magnets is also considered. The analytical sizing equations are used as a first step then optimizations are performed through the 3D finite element analysis (FEA) to attain maximum torque density while staying within the mechanical and electrical constraints. The performances of the AFM types are compared with respect to torque density, power factor and efficiency.

[1]  F. Caricchi,et al.  Prototype of innovative wheel direct drive with water-cooled axial-flux PM motor for electric vehicle applications , 1996, Proceedings of Applied Power Electronics Conference. APEC '96.

[2]  F. Marignetti,et al.  Comparison of Axial Flux PM Synchronous Machines With Different Rotor Back Cores , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[3]  Federico Caricchi,et al.  Nonconventional three-wheel electric vehicle for urban mobility , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[4]  F. Caricchi,et al.  Recent Advances in Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine Technology , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Torque quality and comparison of internal and external rotor axial flux surface-magnet disc machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  F. Crescimbini,et al.  Axial-flux permanent magnet motor for direct-drive elevator systems without machine room , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[7]  K. Sitapati,et al.  Performance comparisons of radial and axial field, permanent magnet, brushless machines , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[8]  L. Dupré,et al.  Comparison of Nonoriented and Grain-Oriented Material in an Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  F. Profumo,et al.  A comparison between the axial flux and the radial flux structures for PM synchronous motors , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[10]  C. Espanet,et al.  Design of an Axial-Flux Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor for Automotive Application: Performance Comparison with Electric Motors Used in EVs and HEVs , 2014, 2014 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC).

[11]  F. Crescimbini,et al.  Influence of the radial variation of the magnet pitch in slotless permanent magnet axial flux motors , 1997, IAS '97. Conference Record of the 1997 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Thirty-Second IAS Annual Meeting.

[12]  F. Marignetti,et al.  Effect of Inclined Static Eccentricity Fault in Single Stator-Single Rotor Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machines , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  R. Nilssen,et al.  Performance Comparisons Among Radial-Flux, Multistage Axial-Flux, and Three-Phase Transverse-Flux PM Machines for Downhole Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[14]  Dean J. Patterson,et al.  A comparison of radial and axial flux structures in electrical machines , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference.

[15]  F. Crescimbini,et al.  Design and construction of a wheel-directly-coupled axial-flux PM motor prototype for EVs , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[16]  F. Crescimbini,et al.  Permanent-magnet, direct-drive, starter/alternator machine with weakened flux linkage for constant-power operation over extremely wide speed range , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[17]  Rong-Jie Wang,et al.  Analysis and Performance of Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine With Air-Cored Nonoverlapping Concentrated Stator Windings , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[18]  J. Pyrhonen,et al.  Performance comparison between low-speed axial-flux and radial-flux permanent-magnet machines including mechanical constraints , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, 2005..

[19]  E. Semail,et al.  Slot/pole combinations choice for concentrated multiphase machines dedicated to mild-hybrid applications , 2011, IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[20]  Cheng-Tsung Liu,et al.  Field-oriented control evaluations of a single-sided permanent magnet axial-flux motor for an electric vehicle , 2003 .

[21]  J. Pyrhonen,et al.  Modeling of axial flux permanent-magnet machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[22]  Jacek F. Gieras,et al.  Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines , 2005 .

[23]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  Performance comparison of dual-rotor radial-flux and axial-flux permanent-magnet BLDC machines , 2003, IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, 2003. IEMDC'03..

[24]  O. Honorati,et al.  Low-cost compact PM machine for adjustable-speed pump application , 1996, IAS '96. Conference Record of the 1996 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Thirty-First IAS Annual Meeting.

[25]  Iqbal Husain,et al.  Design of a modular E-Core flux concentrating axial flux machine , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[26]  Thomas A. Lipo,et al.  A comparison of power density for axial flux machines based on general purpose sizing equations , 1999 .