‘Jack of all trades’? The negotiation of interdisciplinarity within geography

Abstract This paper explores the relationship between interdisciplinary studies and research and researchers’ positionalities, both within and beyond geography. The profound degree to which researchers’ assumptions, expectations and attitudes (which in turn are affected by their personal backgrounds, training, location, etc.) influences the very notion of interdisciplinarity, and what it involves and consists of, is often neither noted nor appreciated. This paper will illustrate, particularly through personal examples, how positionality is part of the circuit of knowledge production, informing academic research, employment and publishing to no small extent. The boundaries of interdisciplinary research are shown to be under constant negotiation, still far from mutual understanding or consensus, a fact which explains the often uneasy identification and negotiation of oneself as an interdisciplinary scholar. The paper concludes by making recommendations at individual and institutional level on how to overcome some of the constraints imposed by researchers’ positionalities to the promotion of interdisciplinary research.

[1]  Janice Radway,et al.  Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problems of Dispersed Audiences and Nomadic Subjects , 1988 .

[2]  G. Rose Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics , 1997 .

[3]  R. Leigh,et al.  The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail , 1982 .

[4]  Robin Williams,et al.  Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme , 2004 .

[5]  T. Hels,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison , 2004 .

[6]  Susan E. Babbitt,et al.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. , 1993 .

[7]  R. Fisher,et al.  Forest soils education and research: Trends, needs, and wild ideas , 2005 .

[8]  Manfred A. Max-Neef Foundations of transdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[9]  Rashmin Gunasekera Use of GIS for environmental impact assessment: an interdisciplinary approach , 2004 .

[10]  R. Sands “Can you overlap here?”: A question for an interdisciplinary team , 1993 .

[11]  A. R. Horwitz Building bridges through collaboration--a pathway for interdisciplinary research. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[12]  A. McMichael,et al.  Assessing ecosystem health. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  E. Winnacker,et al.  Interdisciplinary sciences in the 21st century. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[14]  Paul Sillitoe,et al.  Interdisciplinary experiences: working with indigenous knowledge in development , 2004 .

[15]  Who is interdisciplinary? Two views, two goals, professionals and farmers , 2004 .

[16]  J. Donald University Professors' Views of Knowledge and Validation Processes. , 1990 .

[17]  L. Mcdowell,et al.  Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography , 1992 .

[18]  W. Lockeretz Multidisciplinary Research and Sustainable Agriculture , 1991 .

[19]  Timothy Evans,et al.  Changing landscapes, changing disciplines: seeking to understand interdisciplinarity in landscape ecological change research , 2005 .

[20]  Nigel Thrift,et al.  The future of Geography , 2002 .

[21]  J. Harriss The Case for Cross-Disciplinary Approaches in International Development , 2002 .

[22]  Lisa Lau Virtually positioned: investigating identity and positionality in a case study of South Asian literature in cyberspace , 2004 .

[23]  M. Pasquini,et al.  Meeting grounds: perceiving and defining interdisciplinarity across the arts, social sciences and sciences , 2004 .

[24]  Hilkka Stotesbury,et al.  Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences , 2003 .