Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli

Transportation was proposed as a mechanism whereby narratives can affect beliefs. Defined as absorption into a story, transportation entails imagery, affect, and attentional focus. A transportation scale was developed and validated. Experiment 1 (N = 97) demonstrated that extent of transportation augmented story-consistent beliefs and favorable evaluations of protagonists. Experiment 2 (N = 69) showed that highly transported readers found fewer false notes in a story than less-transported readers. Experiments 3 (N = 274) and 4 (N = 258) again replicated the effects of transportation on beliefs and evaluations; in the latter study, transportation was directly manipulated by using processing instructions. Reduced transportation led to reduced story-consistent beliefs and evaluations. The studies also showed that transportation and corresponding beliefs were generally unaffected by labeling a story as fact or as fiction.

[1]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects : advances in theory and research , 2002 .

[2]  J. J. Strange,et al.  How Anecdotal Accounts in News and in Fiction Can Influence Judgments of a Social Problem’s Urgency, Causes, and Cures , 1999 .

[3]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of the Affective and Cognitive Bases of Attitudes in Susceptibility to Affectively and Cognitively Based Persuasion , 1999 .

[5]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. , 1999 .

[6]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[7]  Douglas R. Hofstadter.  Popular Culture and the Threat to Rational Inquiry , 1998, Science.

[8]  D. Cohen.  Chronicle of Higher Education , 1998 .

[9]  R. Wyer,et al.  The Role of Narratives in Consumer Information Processing , 1998 .

[10]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[11]  M. Hjort.  Emotion and the Arts , 1997 .

[12]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts , 1997 .

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[14]  Melanie C. Green.  Mechanisms of narrative-based belief change , 1996 .

[15]  R. Harrison.  The Western Canon: The Books and Schools of the Ages , 1995 .

[16]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Processing Rational and Emotional Messages: The Cognitive and Affective Mediation of Persuasion , 1995 .

[17]  R. Schank,et al.  Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story , 1995 .

[18]  A. Tesser,et al.  Advanced social psychology , 1995 .

[19]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives , 1994 .

[20]  A. Rubin.  Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. , 1994 .

[21]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  You can't not believe everything you read. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[23]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  The Representation of Fictional Information , 1991 .

[25]  D. Gilbert.  How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[26]  K. Edwards,et al.  The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change , 1990 .

[27]  V. Nell.  Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure , 1988 .

[28]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[29]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Imagination in story response: Relationships between imagery, affect, and structural importance. , 1988 .

[30]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. Bruner.  Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[33]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Incorporation versus compartmentalization in memory for discourse , 1985 .

[34]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[35]  Sapper.  The Best Short Stories , 1984 .

[36]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[37]  A. Tellegen.  Brief manual for the Differential Personality Questionnaire , 1982 .

[38]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[39]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[40]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[41]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[42]  G. Bower,et al.  Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. , 1980 .

[43]  James E. Davis.  Dealing with Censorship. , 1979 .

[44]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Who believes in a just world , 1975 .

[45]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production , 1967 .

[46]  Eloise Jarvis McGraw.  Techniques of fiction writing , 1959 .

[47]  A. A. Lumsdaine,et al.  Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .

[48]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[49]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .