Guidelines for reducing image retakes of general digital radiography

Image retake of radiological examinations not only increases the risk of radiation exposure of the patients, but also wastes the medical resource and degrades the quality of services of the hospitals. This study aimed at discovering factors affecting image retake of general digital radiography for setting guidelines to reduce the image retaking rate. A total of 98,503 general X-ray images retrieved from the picture archiving and communication system database of a medical center in central Taiwan were analyzed. The results showed that the total retaking rate was 4.89% with the position error (56.05%) was the main factor causing image retakes and chest examination showed the highest frequency (1544 cases). On the other hand, skull/face exhibited the highest retaking rate (9.81%) among various types of examinations. After discovering the factors affecting the image retaking rate, suitable guidelines were proposed and introduced. The image retake rate had been significantly reduced to 4.38% and 3.57% 1 month and 6 months, respectively, after the introduction of guidelines. In conclusion, image retake analysis is a quality indicator and is effective for quality assurance of digital radiology. Regular analysis of image retake can find factors inducing image retake and is useful for designing guidelines to reduce the image retake rate.

[1]  T. Seierstad,et al.  Reject analysis in direct digital radiography , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[3]  D. Waaler,et al.  Image rejects/retakes--radiographic challenges. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  J. I. Ten,et al.  Experience with patient dosimetry and quality control online for diagnostic and interventional radiology using DICOM services. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  R. Peer,et al.  Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography , 1999, European Radiology.

[6]  Charles E. Willis,et al.  One Year’s Results from a Server-Based System for Performing Reject Analysis and Exposure Analysis in Computed Radiography , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Chung-Feng Liu,et al.  Managing Repeat Digital Radiography Images—A Systematic Approach and Improvement , 2011, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. , 2009, Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

[9]  G Weatherburn,et al.  The impact of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) upon an intensive care unit. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  Digital Radiography Reject Analysis: Data Collection Methodology, Results, and Recommendations from an In-depth Investigation at Two Hospitals , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  G C Weatherburn,et al.  A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  Bjørn Hofmann,et al.  Image rejects in general direct digital radiography , 2015, Acta radiologica open.

[13]  Daniel I. Rosenthal,et al.  Repeat Rates in Digital Chest Radiography and Strategies for Improvement , 2012, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[14]  J. Mirecki,et al.  Digital Repeat Analysis; Setup and Operation , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS) , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[17]  Christine Hoeffel,et al.  X-ray film reject analysis as a quality indicator , 1999 .