Towards a framework for measuring end to end performance of land administration business processes - A case study

Land administration delivery problems, particularly in developing countries, are generally systemic and complex. Requests in land administration are mostly delivered through business processes that run across multiple organizations. Since the delivery challenges go beyond the capabilities of single organizations to solve alone, a multi organizational approach is suggested to detect, assess and improve LA processes. This paper presents a conceptual model for measuring end to end performance of land administration systems based on cross-organizational business processes. The model, which is constructed on six measurement dimensions, is built on a case study of subdivision processes in six urban municipalities, across three developing countries.

[1]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[2]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Feasibility of performance measurement system for supply chain: a process‐based approach and measures , 2003 .

[3]  Ian Williamson,et al.  Land administration and cadastral trends — a framework for re-engineering , 2001 .

[4]  I. Williamson,et al.  EVALUATION OF NATIONAL LAND ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN SWITZERLAND , 2005 .

[5]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Processes in a cadastre , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[7]  Jaroslav Nenadál.  Process performance measurement in manufacturing organizations , 2008 .

[8]  Daniel Steudler,et al.  Benchmarking Cadastral Systems , 1997 .

[9]  Anka Lisec,et al.  Modelling the rural land transaction procedure , 2008 .

[10]  Tony Burns,et al.  Land administration reform : indicators of success and future challenges , 2007 .

[11]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Modelling real property transactions: an overview , 2007 .

[12]  Kepa Mendibil,et al.  Measuring and managing performance in extended enterprises , 2005 .

[13]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems , 2000 .

[14]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process‐based approach , 2000 .

[15]  Mark Graham Brown,et al.  Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class Performance , 1996 .

[16]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing performance measures: a structured approach , 1997 .

[17]  Daniel Steudler,et al.  Assessing the worldwide comparison of cadastral systems , 2007 .

[18]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Real Property Transactions. Procedures, Transaction Costs and Models , 2008 .

[19]  Peter Kueng,et al.  Process performance measurement system: A tool to support process-based organizations , 2000 .

[20]  Daniel Steudler,et al.  Evaluation of land administration systems , 2004 .

[21]  Henry M. Franken,et al.  STRUCTURAL AND QUANTITATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING AND ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[22]  Jaap Zevenbergen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Land Registration and Cadastre , 2002 .

[23]  R. Johnston,et al.  Performance Measurement in Service Businesses , 1992 .

[24]  A. Neely,et al.  A literature review and research agenda , 1995 .

[25]  H. D. Soto.  The mystery of capital : the role of property rights in creating wealth and alleviating poverty , 2004 .

[26]  Daniel Steudler,et al.  The Development of a Cadastral Template , 2003 .

[27]  Henk Jonkers,et al.  QUANTITATIVE MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS PROCESSES , 1999 .

[28]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .