Optimal Contest Design When the Designer's Payoff Depends on Competitive Balance

This paper investigates optimal contest design when the designer’s payoff is increasing in competitive balance between contestants. A two-player contest with asymmetric effort costs (asymmetric abilities) is considered. Competitive balance is measured by the difference in winning probabilities of the contestants. In contrast to previous studies, the impact of competitive balance on the optimal prize is not unique, but depends on the shape of the contest success function. Furthermore, it is shown that including competitive balance in the designer’s objective may induce the designer to increase the contestants‘ effort costs, for example, by tightening the rules of the contest.

[1]  Panagiotis Tsigaris,et al.  Choice of Tax Base Revisited: Cash Flow vs. Prepayment Approaches to Consumption Taxation , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Ending Rules in Internet Auctions , 2003 .

[3]  F. Stähler,et al.  Market Entry Regulation and International Competition , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Mark Gradstein Optimal contest design: volume and timing of rent seeking in contests , 1998 .

[5]  Kai A. Konrad,et al.  Orchestrating Rent Seeking Contests , 1999 .

[6]  M. Gérard,et al.  Cross-Border Loss Offset and Formulary Apportionment: How Do They Affect Multijurisdictional Firm Investment Spending and Interjurisdictional Tax Competition? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Sandro Brusco,et al.  On Enhanced Cooperation , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Hyun Park,et al.  On the Optimal Size of Public Sector Under Rent-Seeking Competition from State Coffers , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Henrik Jordahl,et al.  Optimal Utilitarian Taxation and Horizontal Equity , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Nirvikar Singh,et al.  A Model of Inequality and Interest Group Politics , 2001 .

[11]  Federico Etro,et al.  Globalization and Political Geography , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  J. Atsu Amegashie,et al.  Some Results on Rent-Seeking Contests with Shortlisting , 2000 .

[13]  C. Pissarides,et al.  Unemployment in Britain: A European Success Story , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  A. Dasgupta,et al.  Designing an optimal contest , 1998 .

[15]  Rent seeking and rent setting with asymmetric effectiveness of lobbying , 1999 .

[16]  Martin D. D. Evans,et al.  Are Different-Currency Assets Imperfect Substitutes? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Small Sample Properties of Forecasts from Autoregressive Models Under Structural Breaks , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  J. Atsu Amegashie,et al.  The design of rent-seeking competitions: Committees, preliminary and final contests , 1999 .

[19]  Michael Reiter,et al.  Business Cycles, Unemployment Insurance, and Calibration of Matching Models , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Wolfgang Peters,et al.  On the Frequency of Interior Cournot-Nash Equilibria in a Public Good Economy , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  William E. Stein,et al.  Asymmetric Rent-Seeking with More than Two Contestants , 2002 .

[22]  Donald Wittman,et al.  Litigation with Symmetric Bargaining and Two-Sided Incomplete Information , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  Economic Contests with Incomplete Information and Optimal Contest Design , 1988 .

[24]  Vivek Ghosal,et al.  Firm and Establishment Volatility: The Role of Sunk Costs, Profit Uncertainty and Technological Change , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Carlo Perroni,et al.  Self-Enforcing International Agreements and Domestic Policy Credibility , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Hyun Park,et al.  Choosing Club Membership Under Tax Competition and Free Riding , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Pierre Salmon,et al.  The Assignment of Powers in an Open-Ended European Union , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  J. Lind,et al.  Fractionalization and the Size of Government , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  L. Christofides,et al.  Contract Duration and Indexation in a Period of Real and Nominal Uncertainty , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  Daniel Gros,et al.  Who Needs Foreign Banks? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Nirvikar Singh,et al.  Contests where there is variation in the marginal productivity of effort , 2001 .

[32]  S. Islam,et al.  Health Adjusted GDP (Hagdp) Measures of the Relationship between Economic Growth, Health Outcomes and Social Welfare , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[33]  Kofi O. Nti Rent-seeking with asymmetric valuations , 1999 .

[34]  C. Blankart,et al.  The Deadlock of the EU Budget: An Economic Analysis of Ways in and Ways Out , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[35]  Stability in the patent race contest of Lee and Wilde , 1999 .

[36]  Patrizio Tirelli,et al.  A Simple and Flexible Alternative to the Stability and Growth Pact Deficit Ceilings: Is it at Hand? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.