Monitoring supports performance in a dual-task paradigm involving a risky decision-making task and a working memory task

Performing two cognitively demanding tasks at the same time is known to decrease performance. The current study investigates the underlying executive functions of a dual-tasking situation involving the simultaneous performance of decision making under explicit risk and a working memory task. It is suggested that making a decision and performing a working memory task at the same time should particularly require monitoring—an executive control process supervising behavior and the state of processing on two tasks. To test the role of a supervisory/monitoring function in such a dual-tasking situation we investigated 122 participants with the Game of Dice Task plus 2-back task (GDT plus 2-back task). This dual task requires participants to make decisions under risk and to perform a 2-back working memory task at the same time. Furthermore, a task measuring a set of several executive functions gathered in the term concept formation (Modified Card Sorting Test, MCST) and the newly developed Balanced Switching Task (BST), measuring monitoring in particular, were used. The results demonstrate that concept formation and monitoring are involved in the simultaneous performance of decision making under risk and a working memory task. In particular, the mediation analysis revealed that BST performance partially mediates the influence of MCST performance on the GDT plus 2-back task. These findings suggest that monitoring is one important subfunction for superior performance in a dual-tasking situation including decision making under risk and a working memory task.

[1]  Melissa T. Buelow.  Predicting Performance on the Columbia Card Task , 2015, Assessment.

[2]  M. Brand,et al.  Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[3]  M. Brand,et al.  Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[4]  Bettina Gathmann,et al.  Stress and decision making: neural correlates of the interaction between stress, executive functions, and decision making under risk , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  S. Crowe,et al.  Impaired decision making on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task as a result of long-term alcohol use , 2013, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  F. Yu,et al.  Dissociation of decision making under ambiguity and decision making under risk in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: A neuropsychological study , 2013, Brain Research.

[7]  M. Brand,et al.  Supporting decisions under risk: Explicit advice differentiallyaffects people according to their working memoryperformance and executive functioning , 2013 .

[8]  O. Wolf,et al.  Paradoxical effects of stress and an executive task on decisions under risk. , 2013, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  Timo Mäntylä,et al.  Gender Differences in Multitasking Reflect Spatial Ability , 2013, Psychological science.

[10]  Tao Wu,et al.  Cerebellum and integration of neural networks in dual-task processing , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  F. Verbruggen,et al.  Proactive Motor Control Reduces Monetary Risk Taking in Gambling , 2012, Psychological science.

[12]  E. Davelaar,et al.  Differential Contributions of Set-Shifting and Monitoring to Dual-Task Interference , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions , 2012, Current directions in psychological science.

[14]  M. Brand,et al.  Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? , 2011, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[15]  Rico Fischer,et al.  Inflexibly Focused under Stress: Acute Psychosocial Stress Increases Shielding of Action Goals at the Expense of Reduced Cognitive Flexibility with Increasing Time Lag to the Stressor , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Improved Intertask Coordination after Extensive Dual-Task Practice , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Valerie Kirsch,et al.  Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Y. Dauvilliers,et al.  Decision making in narcolepsy with cataplexy. , 2011, Sleep.

[19]  Matthias Brand,et al.  Decision-making under risk conditions is susceptible to interference by a secondary executive task , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[20]  Facundo Manes,et al.  Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[21]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  The role of inhibition in task switching: A review , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  L. Timmermann,et al.  Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson's disease: A neuropsychological and psychophysiological study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Mirko Pawlikowski,et al.  Decision making with and without feedback: The role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  H. Markowitsch,et al.  Do amnesic patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome use feedback when making decisions under risky conditions? An experimental investigation with the Game of Dice Task with and without feedback , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[26]  M. Delazer,et al.  Making Decisions and Advising Decisions in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2008, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[27]  Matthias Brand,et al.  Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[28]  Oliver T. Wolf,et al.  Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm , 2008, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[29]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Mapping Task Switching in Frontal Cortex Through Neuropsychological Group Studies , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[30]  Matthias Brand,et al.  The role of strategies in deciding advantageously in ambiguous and risky situations , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[31]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Anterior Prefrontal Function and the Limits of Human Decision-Making , 2007, Science.

[32]  A. Bechara,et al.  Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[33]  R. Drechsler,et al.  Decision-making on an explicit risk-taking task in preadolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2007, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[34]  Tony O’Hagan.  Bayes factors , 2006 .

[35]  Matthias Brand,et al.  Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations , 2006, Neural Networks.

[36]  André Knops,et al.  A special role for numbers in working memory? An fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[38]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Training effects on dual-task performance: are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[39]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Kirsten Labudda,et al.  Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling , 2005, Psychiatry Research.

[42]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Cost of a Voluntary Task Switch , 2022 .

[43]  J. Kessler,et al.  DemTect: a new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia , 2004, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[44]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[46]  I. Robertson,et al.  Rehabilitation of executive function: facilitation of effective goal management on complex tasks using periodic auditory alerts , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  R. D Rogers,et al.  Impaired planning but intact decision making in early Huntington’s disease: implications for specific fronto-striatal pathology , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  D P Salmon,et al.  A normative study of Nelson's (1976) modified version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in healthy older adults. , 1999, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[51]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[52]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[53]  A Baddeley,et al.  Random Generation and the Executive Control of Working Memory , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[54]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[55]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[56]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[57]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[58]  G. Zubicaray,et al.  Nelson's (1976) modified card sorting test: A review , 1996 .

[59]  A. Baddeley.  Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[60]  M. Krečmerová,et al.  Lipases as Tools in the Synthesis of Prodrugs from Racemic 9-(2,3-Dihydroxypropyl)adenine , 2012, Molecules.

[61]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[62]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory , 1995, Nature.

[63]  Ritske De Jong,et al.  The Role of Preparation in Overlapping-task Performance , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[64]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  Tim Shallice,et al.  HIGHER-ORDER COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS AND FRONTAL-LOBE LESIONS IN MAN , 1991 .

[66]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. , 1984 .

[68]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[69]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[70]  H. Nelson.  A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[71]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.