A global review of end user needs: Establishing the need for adaptable cookstoves

Over 100 improved cookstove projects have been initiated since the late 1990s. However, despite the improvements in burn efficiency, such projects have been met with low adoption rates. A leading reason for this is that improved cookstoves often do not meet the needs of the user. This research answers the question: What are the end user needs for a successful cookstove and how do these needs vary across different regions and with differing household preferences? A review of published literature was performed to ascertain the requirements necessary for a successful improved cookstove. The results reveal there exists a set of primary end user needs and a set of secondary end user needs that must be met for users to be satisfied. Additionally, the use and expectations of a cookstove are influenced by a variety of regional, community, and household factors. The successful design of a cookstove requires an understanding of these factors and how they vary with time and circumstance. Given the large variability in cookstove use around the world, it is unlikely that a single rigid stove design will satisfy all the requirements for a successful cookstove. It is recommended that adaptable cookstoves be developed, thus increasing accompanying adoption rates.

[1]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: A review , 2013 .

[2]  Jessica Granderson,et al.  Fuel use and design analysis of improved woodburning cookstoves in the Guatemalan Highlands , 2009 .

[3]  Huang Kun,et al.  One hundred million improved cookstoves in China: how was it done? , 1993 .

[4]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Mohammad Alauddin,et al.  Quantification of Indoor Air Pollution from Using Cookstoves and Estimation of Its Health Effects on Adult Women in Northwest Bangladesh , 2012 .

[6]  E. Derby,et al.  Understanding Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Improved Cookstoves in Bangladesh , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[7]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Summoning earth and fire: The energy development implications of Grameen Shakti (GS) in Bangladesh , 2011 .

[8]  S. E. Muneer,et al.  Adoption of biomass improved cookstoves in a patriarchal society: an example from Sudan. , 2003 .

[9]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Indoor particle size distributions in homes with open fires and improved Patsari cook stoves , 2010 .

[10]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Perceptions of stakeholders about nontraditional cookstoves in Honduras , 2012 .

[11]  S. S. Chandel,et al.  Review of Improved Cookstoves Programme in Western Himalayan State of India , 2004 .

[12]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Adoption and use of improved biomass stoves in Rural Mexico , 2011 .

[13]  J. P. Mittal,et al.  Some field experiences with improved chulhas (cookstoves) introduced in rural households of Andhra Pradesh, India , 1993 .

[14]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[15]  P. Abdul Salam,et al.  Emission factors of wood and charcoal-fired cookstoves , 2002 .

[16]  Fiona Lambe,et al.  Putting the cook before the stove: A user-centred approach to understanding household energy decision-making – A case study of Haryana State, northern India , 2012 .

[17]  Omar Masera,et al.  Understanding an improved cookstove program in rural Mexico: An analysis from the implementers' perspective , 2011 .

[18]  Nathan G. Johnson,et al.  Establishing Consumer Need and Preference for Design of Village Cooking Stoves , 2013, DAC 2013.

[19]  Mentore Vaccari,et al.  Improved cookstove as an appropriate technology for the Logone Valley (Chad – Cameroon): Analysis of fuel and cost savings , 2012 .

[20]  E. FreemanOlivia,et al.  Carbon credits for cookstoves: Trade-offs in climate and health benefits , 2012 .

[21]  Gary J. Wingenbach,et al.  Rethinking improved cookstove diffusion programs: A case study of social perceptions and cooking choices in rural Guatemala , 2014 .

[22]  Christian L'Orange.  The development of numerical tools for characterizing and quantifying biomass cookstove impact , 2013 .

[23]  N. Agnes,et al.  SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS INFLUENCING ADOPTION OF ENERGY–SAVING TECHNOLOGIES AMONG SMALLHOLDER FARMERS: THE CASE OF WEST POKOT COUNTY, KENYA , 2013 .

[24]  Josef Ayoub,et al.  Performance of large portable metal woodstoves for community kitchens , 1996 .

[25]  Omar Masera,et al.  Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking : Case study in rural Mexico , 2007 .

[26]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model , 2000 .

[27]  Omar Masera,et al.  Arresting the Killer in the Kitchen: The Promises and Pitfalls of Commercializing Improved Cookstoves , 2009 .

[28]  Jean-Pierre Bédécarrats,et al.  Thermoelectric power generation from biomass cook stoves , 2010 .

[29]  S. Karekezi.  Renewables in Africa—meeting the energy needs of the poor , 2002 .

[30]  M. Cain.  The household life cycle and economic mobility in rural Bangladesh. , 1978 .

[31]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Nine Principles for Design for the Developing World as Derived From the Engineering Literature , 2014 .

[32]  S. C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Effects of selected parameters on performance and emission of biomass-fired cookstoves. , 2002 .

[33]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  V.V.N Kishore,et al.  Improved cookstoves in rural India: how improved are they? , 2002 .

[35]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance , 2010 .

[36]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[37]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Evaluation of mass and surface area concentration of particle emissions and development of emissions indices for cookstoves in rural India. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  H. Zerriffi,et al.  Carbon credits for cookstoves: trade-offs in climate and health benefits , 2012 .

[39]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[40]  Radhika Menon,et al.  A rapid assessment randomised-controlled trial of improved cookstoves in rural Ghana , 2012 .

[41]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Impact of improved cookstoves on indoor air quality in the Bundelkhand region in India , 2007 .

[42]  Nathan Gregory Johnson,et al.  Village energy system dynamics of an isolated rural West African village , 2012 .

[43]  N. L. Panwar,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of energy efficient biomass gasifier based cookstove on multi fuels , 2009 .

[44]  Amulya K. N. Reddy,et al.  Energy After Rio: Prospects and Challenges , 1997 .

[45]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  What makes people cook with improved biomass stoves. A comparative international review of Stove Programs. Energy series. World Bank technical paper , 1994 .

[46]  Philip Mann,et al.  Win-Win Scenarios at the Climate-Development Interface: Challenges and Opportunities for Cookstove Replacement Programs Through Carbon Finance , 2010 .

[47]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A Framework for Flexible Systems and Its Implementation in Multiattribute Decision Making , 2004 .

[48]  Vilas R. Kalamkar,et al.  A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design , 2014 .

[49]  Britta Victor.  Sustaining Culture with Sustainable Stoves: The Role of Tradition in Providing Clean-Burning Stoves to Developing Countries , 2011 .

[50]  I. Jan.  What makes people adopt improved cookstoves? Empirical evidence from rural northwest Pakistan , 2012 .

[51]  K. R. Smith,et al.  Indoor respirable particulate matter concentrations from an open fire, improved cookstove, and LPG/open fire combination in a rural Guatemalan community. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  K. R. Smith,et al.  Carbon monoxide as a tracer for assessing exposures to particulate matter in wood and gas cookstove households of highland Guatemala. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  Nathan G. Johnson,et al.  Factors affecting fuelwood consumption in household cookstoves in an isolated rural West African village , 2012 .

[54]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves , 2011 .

[55]  Vijay Modi,et al.  Testing institutional biomass cookstoves in rural Kenyan schools for the Millennium Villages Project , 2010 .

[56]  Nathan G. Johnson,et al.  Risk Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Biomass Cookstoves , 2005 .

[57]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  M. Adrianzen.  Improved cooking stoves and firewood consumption: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Northern Peruvian Andes , 2013 .

[59]  O. Masera,et al.  Beyond fuelwood savings: Valuing the economic benefits of introducing improved biomass cookstoves in the Purépecha region of Mexico , 2010 .

[60]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Bioenergy and sustainable development , 2007 .

[61]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  HOUSEHOLD ENERGY, INDOOR AIR POLLUTION, AND HEALTH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: Knowledge Base for Effective Interventions , 2002 .

[62]  O. Masera,et al.  Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico. , 2008 .