An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch.

A database is presented of measurements of the fundamental frequency, the frequencies of the first three formants, and the duration of the 15 vowels of Standard Dutch as spoken in the Netherlands (Northern Standard Dutch) and in Belgium (Southern Standard Dutch). The speech material consisted of read monosyllabic utterances in a neutral consonantal context (i.e., /sVs/). Recordings were made for 20 female talkers and 20 male talkers, who were stratified for the factors age, gender, and region. Of the 40 talkers, 20 spoke Northern Standard Dutch and 20 spoke Southern Standard Dutch. The results indicated that the nine monophthongal Dutch vowels /a [see symbol in text] epsilon i I [see symbol in text] u y Y/ can be separated fairly well given their steady-state characteristics, while the long mid vowels /e o ø/ and three diphthongal vowels /epsilon I [see symbol in text]u oey/ also require information about their dynamic characteristics. The analysis of the formant values indicated that Northern Standard Dutch and Southern Standard Dutch differ little in the formant frequencies at steady-state for the nine monophthongal vowels. Larger differences between these two language varieties were found for the dynamic specifications of the three long mid vowels, and, to a lesser extent, of the three diphthongal vowels.

[1]  Robert Hagiwara,et al.  DIALECT VARIATION AND FORMANT FREQUENCY : THE AMERICAN ENGLISH VOWELS REVISITED , 1997 .

[2]  R. Plomp,et al.  Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 25 female speakers , 1973 .

[3]  W. Strange,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Plomp,et al.  Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 50 male speakers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[7]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  Identification of steady-state vowels synthesized from the Peterson and Barney measurements. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  David Deterding,et al.  The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation , 1997, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[9]  S. F. Disner Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Maria-Gabriella Di Benedetto Frequency and time variations of the first formant: Properties relevant to the perception of vowel height , 1989 .

[11]  T. M. Nearey Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Maria-Gabriella Di Benedetto Vowel representation: Some observations on temporal and spectral properties of the first formant frequency , 1989 .

[13]  H. V. D. Velde,et al.  Watching Dutch Change: A Real Time Study of Variation and Change in Standard Dutch Pronunciation , 1997 .

[14]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Evaluation of a strategy for automatic formant tracking , 2002 .

[15]  W. Klein,et al.  Vowel spectra, vowel spaces, and vowel identification. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. Whalen,et al.  The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels , 1995 .

[19]  A. Bell Broadcast news as a language standard , 1983 .