The Resistance of Swarm Ecosystem Under Environmental Variation

Evolving swarms can be used both to solve real-world problems and to study biological and ecological phenomena. We simulated an evolving swarm of birds under three different types of climate-change-related environmental variation a temperate environment becoming tropical, a temperate enviroment becoming a desert, and a tropical environment becoming a desert. We found that desertification increased expirations within the swarm and decreased population stability. The direction of the variation tropicalification or desertification had a greater impact on the dynamics of the swarm than the degree of variation when it came to these outcomes. The environmental variation also affected the genetics of the birds, with decreased food availability leading to collision avoidance genes being downplayed, and searching behavior for food being changed. High-intensity environmental variation led to less genetic stability post-change than lowerintensity environmental variation. Swarming and flocking behavior is ubiquitous throughout all scales of biological and physical systems. Swarming simulations were first developed by Reynolds (1987) using his boids, simple agents that moved according to a set of basic rules. Much later swarming behavior simulation work has focused on agent-based modeling, which is centered around the modeling of populations of individuals with rules governing their behavior (Mach and Schweitzer, 2003). Agent-based modeling has been used to study such subjects as the dynamics of mountian pine beetle infestations of forests (Perez and Dragicevic, 2010) and the dynamics of how bacteria aggregate to form microfilms (Lardon et al., 2011). Recent advances in robotics have made it possible to experiment with large-scale physical swarms of robots (Rubenstein et al., 2012). Swarm flying behavior is increasingly an area of interest, with a variety of algorithms and applications being developed. Karaboga (2005) used simulations of bee swarm flying to develop a numerical optimization method, and Su et al. (2009) modeled flocking behavior in the presence of a group leader. Optimization of heterogenous swarms of flying agents is challenging, but is potentially very useful in applications such as crop polination (Nagpal et al., 2011; Figure 1: Example of evolving swarm and environment. Berman et al., 2011). Flying swarms have also been applied in the lab to tasks such as chemical cloud detection (Kovacina et al., 2002) and dynamic communications relays (Hauert et al., 2008).

[1]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Modeling mountain pine beetle infestation with an agent-based approach at two spatial scales , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Gore,et al.  Feedback between Population and Evolutionary Dynamics Determines the Fate of Social Microbial Populations , 2013, PLoS biology.

[4]  M. Ayres,et al.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Craig W. Reynolds An evolved, vision-based behavioral model of coordinated group motion , 1993 .

[6]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Ant-based swarming with positionless micro air vehicles for communication relay , 2008, Swarm Intelligence.

[7]  Guang Yang,et al.  Multi-agent control algorithms for chemical cloud detection and mapping using unmanned air vehicles , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Kilobot: A low cost scalable robot system for collective behaviors , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  R. Coppinger,et al.  Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  Spring Berman,et al.  Design of control policies for spatially inhomogeneous robot swarms with application to commercial pollination , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Climate, changing phenology, and other life history traits: Nonlinearity and match–mismatch to the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Spring Berman,et al.  Optimization of stochastic strategies for spatially inhomogeneous robot swarms: A case study in commercial pollination , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  AN IDEA BASED ON HONEY BEE SWARM FOR NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION , 2005 .

[14]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  iDynoMiCS: next-generation individual-based modelling of biofilms. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[15]  Xiao Fan Wang,et al.  Flocking of Multi-Agents With a Virtual Leader , 2009, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Multi-agent Model of Biological Swarming , 2003, ECAL.

[17]  A. Møller,et al.  Effects of Climate Change on Birds , 2010 .

[18]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology , 1981 .

[19]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[20]  K. Lindgren,et al.  Cooperation in an unpredictable environment , 2002 .

[21]  C. Both Food availability, mistiming, and climatic change , 2010 .

[22]  R. Sibly Optimal group size is unstable , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  Not) Evolving Collective Behaviours in Synthetic Fish , 1996 .

[24]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[25]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[26]  Lee Spector,et al.  Emergence of Collective Behavior in Evolving Populations of Flying Agents , 2003, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[27]  Mike S. Fowler,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary dynamics under coloured environmental variation. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  Jacob Johansson,et al.  Effects of Territory Competition and Climate Change on Timing of Arrival to Breeding Grounds: A Game-Theory Approach , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[29]  David B. Knoester,et al.  Evolving Virtual Fireflies , 2009, ECAL.

[30]  Jacob Johansson,et al.  Game theory sheds new light on ecological responses to current climate change when phenology is historically mismatched. , 2012, Ecology letters.