Assumed‐deformation gradient finite elements with nodal integration for nearly incompressible large deformation analysis

An assumed-strain finite element technique for non-linear finite deformation is presented. The weighted-residual method enforces weakly the balance equation with the natural boundary condition and also the kinematic equation that links the elementwise and the assumed-deformation gradient. Assumed gradient operators are derived via nodal integration from the kinematic-weighted residual. A variety of finite element shapes fits the derived framework: four-node tetrahedra, eight-, 27-, and 64-node hexahedra are presented here. Since the assumed-deformation gradients are expressed entirely in terms of the nodal displacements, the degrees of freedom are only the primitive variables (displacements at the nodes). The formulation allows for general anisotropic materials and no volumetric/deviatoric split is required. The consistent tangent operator is inexpensive and symmetric. Furthermore, the material update and the tangent moduli computation are carried out exactly as for classical displacement-based models; the only deviation is the consistent use of the assumed-deformation gradient in place of the displacement-derived deformation gradient. Examples illustrate the performance with respect to the ability of the present technique to resist volumetric locking. A constraint count can partially explain the insensitivity of the resulting finite element models to locking in the incompressible limit. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Reese On a physically stabilized one point finite element formulation for three-dimensional finite elasto-plasticity , 2005 .

[2]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Variational and projection methods for the volume constraint in finite deformation elasto-plasticity , 1985 .

[3]  K. Bathe,et al.  A finite element formulation for nonlinear incompressible elastic and inelastic analysis , 1987 .

[4]  J. Bonet,et al.  A simple average nodal pressure tetrahedral element for incompressible and nearly incompressible dynamic explicit applications , 1998 .

[5]  Michael A. Puso,et al.  Meshfree and finite element nodal integration methods , 2008 .

[6]  E. A. Repetto,et al.  Tetrahedral composite finite elements , 2002 .

[7]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri-linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems☆ , 1993 .

[8]  Petr Krysl,et al.  Locking‐free continuum displacement finite elements with nodal integration , 2008 .

[9]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part III: computational aspects of the nonlinear theory , 1990 .

[10]  Michael A. Puso,et al.  A stabilized nodally integrated tetrahedral , 2006 .

[11]  E. A. S. Neto,et al.  F‐bar‐based linear triangles and tetrahedra for finite strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids. Part I: formulation and benchmarking , 2005 .

[12]  A. A. Fernandes,et al.  Analysis of 3D problems using a new enhanced strain hexahedral element , 2003 .

[13]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Formulation of implicit finite element methods for multiplicative finite deformation plasticity , 1990 .

[14]  E. A. de Souza Neto,et al.  An assessment of the average nodal volume formulation for the analysis of nearly incompressible solids under finite strains , 2004 .

[15]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  A mixed-enhanced formulation tetrahedral finite elements , 2000 .

[16]  S. Reese,et al.  A new locking-free brick element technique for large deformation problems in elasticity ☆ , 2000 .

[17]  Z. Yosibash,et al.  On volumetric locking‐free behaviour of p‐version finite elements under finite deformations , 2007 .

[18]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes , 1992 .

[19]  S. Reese On the Equivalent of Mixed Element Formulations and the Concept of Reduced Integration in Large Deformation Problems , 2002 .

[20]  Oubay Hassan,et al.  An averaged nodal deformation gradient linear tetrahedral element for large strain explicit dynamic applications , 2001 .

[21]  T. Hughes,et al.  B¯ and F¯ projection methods for nearly incompressible linear and non-linear elasticity and plasticity using higher-order NURBS elements , 2008 .

[22]  D. Owen,et al.  Design of simple low order finite elements for large strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids , 1996 .

[23]  Michael A. Puso,et al.  A highly efficient enhanced assumed strain physically stabilized hexahedral element , 2000 .

[24]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A CLASS OF MIXED ASSUMED STRAIN METHODS AND THE METHOD OF INCOMPATIBLE MODES , 1990 .

[25]  D. W. Scharpf,et al.  Finite element method — the natural approach , 1979 .

[26]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A uniform strain hexahedron and quadrilateral with orthogonal hourglass control , 1981 .

[27]  Clark R. Dohrmann,et al.  Uniform Strain Elements for Three-Node Triangular and Four-Node Tetrahedral Meshes , 1999 .