Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for Elementary and Middle Schools. NCEE 2009-4060.

Manipulatives are usually used in lower grades in the initial stages of learning as teachers introduce basic concepts with whole numbers. This exposure to concrete objects is often fleeting and transitory. The use of manipulatives in upper elementary school grades is virtually nonexistent.117 117. Howard, Perry, and Lindsay (1996); Howard, Perry, and Conroy (1995). RECOMMEnDATIOn 5. InTERvEnTIOn MATERIAlS ShOulD InCluDE OPPORTunITIES fOR ThE STuDEnT ( 33 ) The panel suggests that the interventionist use concrete objects in two ways. First, in lower elementary grades, use concrete objects more extensively in the initial stages of learning to reinforce the understanding of basic concepts and operations.118 Concrete models are routinely used to teach basic foundational concepts such as place value.119 They are also useful in teaching other aspects of mathematics such as multiplication facts. When a multiplication fact is memorized by question and answer alone, a student may believe that numbers are to be memorized rather than understood. For example, 4 × 6 equals 24. When shown using manipulatives (as in example 7, p. 35), 4 × 6 means 4 groups of 6, which total as 24 objects. 118. Darch (1989); Fuchs, Seethaler et al. (2008); Fuchs, Fuchs, Craddock et al. (2008). 119. Fuchs et al. (2005); Fuchs, Seethaler et al. (2008); Fuchs, Powell et al. (2008). Second, in the upper grades, use concrete objects when visual representations do not seem sufficient in helping students understand mathematics at the more abstract level. Use manipulatives expeditiously, and focus on fading them away systematically to reach the abstract level.120 In other words, explicitly teach students the concepts and operations when students are at the concrete level and consistently repeat the instructional procedures at the visual and abstract levels. Using consistent language across representational systems (manipulatives, visual representations, and abstract symbols) has been an important component in several research studies.121 Example 8 (p. 35) shows a set of matched concrete, visual, and abstract representations of a concept involving solving singlevariable equations. 120. Fuchs et al. (2005); Witzel (2005); Witzel, Mercer, and Miller (2003). 121. Fuchs et al. (2005); Butler et al. (2003); Witzel (2005); Witzel, Mercer, and Miller (2003). Example 4. Representation of the counting on strategy using a number line 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RECOMMEnDATIOn 5. InTERvEnTIOn MATERIAlS ShOulD InCluDE OPPORTunITIES fOR ThE STuDEnT ( 34 ) Example 5. Using visual representations for multidigit addition Example 6. Strip diagrams can help students make sense of fractions A group of ten can be drawn with a long line to indicate that ten ones are joined to form one ten: Simple drawings help make sense of two-digit addition with regrouping: 36

[1]  M. Field,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program , 1990 .

[2]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Screening for Mathematics Difficulties in K-3 Students. Second Edition. , 2007 .

[3]  Hung-Hsi Wu Must Content Dictate Pedagogy in Mathematics Education , 2005 .

[4]  J R McLeod,et al.  Keep Up the Good Work , 1990 .

[5]  Lucinda S. Spaulding,et al.  Is Response to Intervention Good Policy for Specific Learning Disability , 2008 .

[6]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Explicitly Teaching for Transfer: Effects on Third-Grade Students' Mathematical Problem Solving. , 2003 .

[7]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Explicit Instruction in Mathematics Problem Solving , 1984 .

[8]  Debi Gartland,et al.  Responsiveness to Intervention and Learning Disabilities , 2005 .

[9]  L. Fuchs,et al.  High-Achieving Students’ Interactions and Performance on Complex Mathematical Tasks as a Function of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Pairings , 1998 .

[10]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Mathematics Intervention for First- and Second-Grade Students With Mathematics Difficulties , 2008 .

[11]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention , 2007 .

[12]  M. Beirne-Smith Peer tutoring in arithmetic for children with learning disabilities. , 1991, Exceptional children.

[13]  David W. Walker,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods of Teaching Mathematics Story Problem-Solving with Learning Disabled Students. , 1990 .

[14]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis of Mathematics Curricular Materials from a Pedagogical Perspective , 1997 .

[15]  Russell Gersten,et al.  The Sustained Use of Research-Based Instructional Practice , 2004 .

[16]  D. Geary Mathematics and Learning Disabilities , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  Problem (1) , 1994 .

[18]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  The Effects of Tier 2 Intervention on the Mathematics Performance of First-Grade Students who are at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties , 2008 .

[19]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  An Exploratory Validation of Curriculum-Based Mathematical Word Problem-Solving Tasks as Indicators of Mathematics Proficiency for Third Graders , 2005 .

[20]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Strategy training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. , 1986 .

[21]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing Kindergartners' Mathematical Development: Effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies , 2001, The Elementary School Journal.

[22]  Ted S. Hasselbring,et al.  Developing Math Automaticity in Learning Handicapped Children: The Role of Computerized Drill and Practice. , 1988 .

[23]  David J. Chard,et al.  Using Measures of Number Sense to Screen for Difficulties in Mathematics: Preliminary Findings , 2005 .

[24]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Number Combination Skill in At-Risk First Graders , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  An Evaluation of Curriculum-Based Measurement of Mathematics Word Problem—Solving Measures for Monitoring Third-Grade Students' Mathematics Competence , 2007 .

[26]  L. Fuchs,et al.  A Response to “Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention” , 2006 .

[27]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement , 2005 .

[28]  D. Geary,et al.  Learning Disabilities in Arithmetic : Problem-Solving Differences and Cognitive Deficits , 2003 .

[29]  C. Darch Comprehension Instruction for High School Learning Disabled Students. , 1989 .

[30]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction , 2004 .

[31]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Number Sense , 1999 .

[32]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children , 1989 .

[33]  J. Klingner,et al.  Why Are So Many Minority Students in Special Education?: Understanding Race & Disability in Schools , 2005 .

[34]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Extending Responsiveness to Intervention to Mathematics at First and Third Grades , 2007 .

[35]  Paul Wehman A New Era , 2002 .

[36]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems , 2003 .

[37]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  A Curricular-Sampling Approach to Progress Monitoring , 2008 .

[38]  Erica S. Lembke,et al.  Establishing Technically Adequate Measures of Progress in Early Numeracy , 2008 .

[39]  Erica S. Lembke,et al.  Identifying Early Numeracy Indicators for Kindergarten and First–Grade Students , 2009 .

[40]  Nelly Tournaki,et al.  The Differential Effects of Teaching Addition Through Strategy Instruction Versus Drill and Practice to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 2003, Journal of learning disabilities.

[41]  Bradley S. Witzel,et al.  Using CRA to Teach Algebra to Students with Math Difficulties in Inclusive Settings , 2005 .

[42]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Comparisons among Individual and Cooperative Performance Assessments and Other Measures of Mathematics Competence , 1998, The Elementary school journal.

[43]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Early Identification and Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[44]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Classwide Curriculum-Based Measurement: Helping General Educators Meet the Challenge of Student Diversity , 1994 .

[45]  K. Kutash,et al.  Reducing Behavior Problems in the Elementary School Classroom. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2008-012. , 2008 .

[46]  A. Foegen,et al.  Identifying Growth Indicators for Low-Achieving Students in Middle School Mathematics , 2001 .

[47]  M. Suzanne Donovan,et al.  Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. , 2002 .

[48]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities , 1998 .

[49]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems , 2006 .

[50]  Anne Foegen,et al.  Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics , 2007 .

[51]  Cecil D. Mercer,et al.  Teaching Algebra to Students with Learning Difficulties: An Investigation of an Explicit Instruction Model , 2003 .

[52]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Fraction Skills and Proportional Reasoning , 2007 .

[53]  James S. Braswell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics, 2000. , 2001 .

[54]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Tutoring with and without Validated Classroom Instruction on At-Risk Students' Math Problem Solving: Are Two Tiers of Prevention Better Than One? , 2008, Journal of educational psychology.

[55]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Encouraging girls in math and science , 2007 .

[56]  Evelyn S. Johnson,et al.  How Can We Improve the Accuracy of Screening Instruments , 2009 .

[57]  Joseph C. Witt,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Curriculum-based Measurement Readiness Probes for Kindergarten Students , 2001 .

[58]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Descriptive analysis of fifth grade division instruction in basal mathematics programs: Violations of pedagogy , 1996 .

[59]  A. Foegen Progress Monitoring in Middle School Mathematics , 2008 .

[60]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Mathematics Screening and Progress Monitoring at First Grade: Implications for Responsiveness to Intervention , 2007 .

[61]  Mathematics and Manipulatives: Views from the Secondary Schools. , 1996 .

[62]  Asha K. Jitendra Solving math word problems: Teaching students with learning disabilities using schema-based instruction , 2007 .

[63]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. , 2003, Child development.

[64]  Daniel B. Berch,et al.  Making Sense of Number Sense , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[65]  K. A. Heller,et al.  Placing children in special education : a strategy for equity , 1982 .

[66]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Remediating Computational Deficits at Third Grade: A Randomized Field Trial , 2008, Journal of research on educational effectiveness.

[67]  Susan P. Miller,et al.  Fraction Instruction for Students with Mathematics Disabilities: Comparing Two Teaching Sequences , 2003 .

[68]  Robert Helwig,et al.  Using a Concept-Grounded, Curriculum-Based Measure in Mathematics to Predict Statewide Test Scores for Middle School Students with LD , 2002 .

[69]  S. Deno,et al.  Using Math and Reading Curriculum-Based Measurements to Predict State Mathematics Test Performance , 2007 .

[70]  Mercer Jennifer Ann,et al.  PUBLICATION manual of the American Psychological Association. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[71]  Carole S. Robinson,et al.  Toward a Two–Factor Theory of One Type of Mathematics Disabilities , 2002 .

[72]  S. Deno,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative , 1985, Exceptional children.

[73]  John W. Fantuzzo,et al.  Reciprocal Peer Tutoring and Parent Partnership: Does Parent Involvement Make a Difference?. , 1993 .

[74]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing third-grade student' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. , 2003 .

[75]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  All Our Children Learning , 1982 .

[76]  Y Okamoto,et al.  Exploring the microstructure of children's central conceptual structures in the domain of number. , 2008, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[77]  Criteria for practice guideline development and evaluation. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[78]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. , 2001 .

[79]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[80]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[81]  Eric A. Jenkins,et al.  How Children Discover New Strategies , 1989 .

[82]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities , 2007 .

[83]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty. , 2005 .

[84]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Acquisition and Transfer Effects of Classwide Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Mathematics for Students with Varying Learning Histories. , 1995 .

[85]  Brian R. Bryant,et al.  Teaching Students With Special Needs in Inclusive Classrooms , 2007 .

[86]  A. Foegen Technical Adequacy of General Outcome Measures for Middle School Mathematics , 2000 .

[87]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Task-Focused Goals on Low-Achieving Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1997 .

[88]  Direct Instruction in Math Word Problems: Students with Learning Disabilities , 1991, Exceptional children.

[89]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?. , 1993 .

[90]  Robin Jacob,et al.  Reading First Implementation Evaluation: Interim Report. , 2006 .

[91]  Shameem Nyla NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION , 2004 .

[92]  Jane F. Schielack Focus in Grade 8: Teaching with Curriculum Focal Points , 2010 .

[93]  J. Stigler,et al.  The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom , 1999 .

[94]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Third Graders about Real‐Life Mathematical Problem Solving: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2006, The Elementary School Journal.

[95]  Irma Perez-Johnson,et al.  Variability in Pretest-Posttest Correlation Coefficients by Student Achievement Level. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences , 2011 .

[96]  A. Vanderheyden,et al.  Development and Validation of a Process for Screening Referrals to Special Education , 2003 .

[97]  Shirley A. Jones,et al.  National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities , 2008 .

[98]  N. Zigmond,et al.  Progress Monitoring of Mathematics Among Students with Learning Disabilities , 2005 .

[99]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  What is Measured in Mathematics Tests? Construct Validity of Curriculum-Based Mathematics Measures , 2002 .

[100]  R. S. Parmar,et al.  Protocol Analysis of Strategies Used By Students with Mild Disabilities when Solving Arithmetic Word Problems , 1992 .

[101]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Extended Practice of Basic Addition Facts: Strategy Changes in Learning-Disabled Students , 1988 .

[102]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  Preventing Mathematics Difficulties in the Primary Grades: The Critical Features of Instruction in Textbooks as Part of the Equation , 2008 .

[103]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Preventative Tutoring on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Third-Grade Students with Math and Reading Difficulties , 2008, Exceptional children.

[104]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Problem Solving and Computational Skill: Are They Shared or Distinct Aspects of Mathematical Cognition? , 2008, Journal of educational psychology.

[105]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[106]  M. McCloskey Quantitative literacy and developmental dyscalculias. , 2007 .

[107]  David J. Chard,et al.  An Analysis of Early Numeracy Curriculum-Based Measurement , 2008 .

[108]  Joseph C. Witt,et al.  A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education. , 2007 .

[109]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Expanding Schema-Based Transfer Instruction to Help Third Graders Solve Real-Life Mathematical Problems , 2004 .

[110]  Brian C. McKevitt,et al.  Best Practices in School Psychology IV , 1990 .

[111]  P. Peterson Using Knowledge of how Students Think about Mathematics. , 1989 .

[112]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Effects of Mathematical Word Problem—Solving Instruction on Middle School Students with Learning Problems , 2005 .

[113]  R. Gersten,et al.  The Burden of Proof: Validity as Improvement of Instructional Practice , 1995 .

[114]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Using Kindergarten Number Sense to Predict Calculation Fluency in Second Grade , 2008, Journal of learning disabilities.

[115]  T. Guskey The Influence of Change in Instructional Effectiveness Upon the Affective Characteristics of Teachers , 1984 .

[116]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities. , 1998 .

[117]  John Woodward,et al.  Developing Automaticity in Multiplication Facts: Integrating Strategy Instruction with Timed Practice Drills , 2006 .

[118]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation Into the Identification and Development of Early Mathematics Curriculum-Based Measurement , 2004 .

[119]  J. Stillman,et al.  The Use of Process Mnemonics in Teaching Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities , 2000 .