A multiple criteria approach for ship risk classification: An alternative to the Paris MoU Ship Risk Profile

The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU) is responsible for controlling substandard shipping in European waters and, consequently, increasing the standards of safety, pollution prevention, and onboard living and working conditions. Since 2011, the Memorandum adopted a system of points, named the “Ship Risk Profile” (SRP), under which each ship is assigned a risk profile according to its score on a set of criteria. Being a multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) tool at its core, comprising criteria, weights, and risk categories, limited research has been performed on the SRP from an MCDA perspective. The purpose of this paper is to propose an MCDA approach for ship risk classification through the Deck of Cards Method (DCM). The DCM is particularly suitable within this context as it allows, intuitively for the decision-maker, to model preference among different criteria and among different levels on criteria scales. First, a framework is built, based on the criteria established in the SRP. Second, the DCM is used to build the MCDA model, including the definition of the criteria value functions and criteria weights. Finally, the proposed MCDA model is applied to a dataset of ships and the results are discussed. Robust results have been obtained with the proposed approach, making it a potential alternative to the current SRP.

[1]  B. J. C. Perera,et al.  Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis - A case study on urban water supply , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Nicolas Dechy,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Luis Martínez,et al.  Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Zhisen Yang,et al.  Comparative analysis of the impact of new inspection regime on port state control inspection , 2020 .

[5]  Aïda Valls,et al.  ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Zhisen Yang,et al.  A risk-based game model for rational inspections in port state control , 2018, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[7]  Silvia Angilella,et al.  The financing of innovative SMEs: A multicriteria credit rating model , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  A robust hierarchical nominal multicriteria classification method based on similarity and dissimilarity , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  The quality of service: An overall performance assessment for water utilities , 2017 .

[10]  John Hare,et al.  Port State Control: Strong Medicine to Cure a Sick Industry , 1997 .

[11]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Probabilistic approach for characterising the static risk of ships using Bayesian networks , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  K. Vairavamoorthy,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management , 2011 .

[13]  M. Kane Measurement theory. , 1980, NLN publications.

[14]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Aykut I. Ölçer,et al.  After 40 years of regional and coordinated ship safety inspections: Destination reached or new point of departure? , 2017 .

[16]  Alexander Schwartz,et al.  Decision Analysis And Behavioral Research , 2016 .

[17]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Designing a municipal sustainable energy strategy using multi-criteria decision analysis , 2018 .

[18]  Ho-Sam Bang,et al.  Recent Developments in Regional Memorandums of Understanding on Port State Control , 2012 .

[19]  Fausto Cavallaro,et al.  A comparative assessment of thin-film photovoltaic production processes using the ELECTRE III method , 2010 .

[20]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  A multicriteria outranking approach for modeling corporate credit ratings: An application of the Electre Tri-nC method , 2019, Omega.

[21]  Maximo Q. Mejia,et al.  Achievements and challenges on the implementation of the European Directive on Port State Control , 2018, Transport Policy.

[22]  Marc Muselli,et al.  Multicriteria selection aiding related to photovoltaic plants on farming fields on Corsica island: A real case study using the ELECTRE outranking framework , 2011 .

[23]  B. Sage Identification of ‘High Risk Vessels’ in coastal waters , 2005 .

[24]  Zhisen Yang,et al.  Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks , 2018 .

[25]  Dmitry Podkopaev,et al.  Simple additive weighting - A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Peter Schlyter,et al.  Less is more: Strategic scale site suitability for concentrated solar thermal power in Western Australia , 2012 .

[27]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[28]  Rita Gamberini,et al.  On the elicitation of criteria weights in PROMETHEE-based ranking methods for a mobile application , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Ângelo Palos Teixeira,et al.  A multicriteria outranking approach for ship collision risk assessment , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Using a Segmenting Description approach in Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  M. Schaafsma,et al.  A social, environmental and economic evaluation protocol for potential gas hydrate exploitation projects , 2020 .

[32]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Pairwise comparison tables within the deck of cards method in multiple criteria decision aiding , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[34]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Benedetto Matarazzo,et al.  Other Outranking Approaches , 2005 .

[36]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Decision-Aiding Today: What Should We Expect? , 1999 .

[37]  Reza Kerachian,et al.  Ranking solutions of multi-objective reservoir operation optimization models using multi-criteria decision analysis , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..