Intraspecific leaf economic trait variation partially explains coffee performance across agroforestry management regimes

The leaf economics spectrum (LES) refers to a suite of correlated leaf-level physiological, morphological, and chemical traits that can be used to describe life-history strategy among plant species. Documenting LES trait variation across environmental gradients has been important for understanding natural plant community dynamics in response to environmental change. However few studies have examined how LES traits covary within crops, or how the LES is correlated with farm-level management practices or goals, especially for important tree-crops such as coffee. We analyzed within-species variation in eight leaf traits in 60 Coffea arabica plants, across four management treatments differing in shade-tree species composition, to test (i) if hypothesized LES patterns also describe within-species trait variation, and (ii) if LES traits vary in response to management regimes, or are correlated with reproductive output. Leaf traits varied widely across coffee plants with photosynthetic rates (Amass) and leaf area showing especially high variation. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, coffee leaf traits covaried in patterns consistent with the LES, suggesting shifts between leaf-level resource acquisition and conservation traits among plants may also underpin coffee responses to agroforestry management. The position of a coffee plant along the LES (as described by a principal component analysis score) was best explained by light availability, but did not vary systematically with shade tree composition. LES traits were weakly but significantly related to plant-level reproductive output: coffee plants associated with lower Amass and leaf N values, and higher leaf mass per area were associated with greater reproductive output. In showing that the LES describes resource capture and/or conservation strategies among coffee plants, our study represents a novel adoption of the LES to address applied questions in managed systems. Since within species differences in leaf traits partially explain differences in coffee yield, we also suggest that trait-based research in agroecology can contribute to an applied and comprehensive understanding of crop functional biology, and ultimately, agroecosystem structure and function.

[1]  G. Maire,et al.  Competition for light in heterogeneous canopies: Application of MAESTRA to a coffee (Coffea arabica L.) agroforestry system , 2013 .

[2]  É. Malézieux,et al.  Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[3]  Richard Betts,et al.  Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  L. Meylan.  Design of cropping systems combining production and ecosystem services : developing a methodology combining numerical modeling and participation of farmers. Application to coffee-based agroforestry in Costa Rica , 2012 .

[5]  A. Fernie,et al.  In field-grown coffee trees source-sink manipulation alters photosynthetic rates, independently of carbon metabolism, via alterations in stomatal function. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[6]  P. C. Cavatte,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in response to light in the coffee tree , 2009 .

[7]  K. Harashina,et al.  Leaf functional traits and functional diversity of multistoried agroforests in West Java, Indonesia , 2012 .

[8]  K. Thompson,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies , 1999 .

[9]  M. Westoby,et al.  Small‐seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime , 2004 .

[10]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification , 2005 .

[11]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  A multi‐trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra‐ vs. interspecific variability in plant traits , 2010 .

[12]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Ü. Niinemets.  A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance , 2010, Ecological Research.

[14]  L. Poorter,et al.  Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light; relationships with light demand and adult stature. , 2006 .

[15]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Demography and allometry of Cecropia obtusifolia, a neotropical pioneer tree - an evaluation of the climax-pioneer paradigm for tropical rain forests , 1992 .

[16]  D. Sánchez-Gómez,et al.  Variation in functional leaf traits among beech provenances during a Spanish summer reflects the differences in their origin , 2012, Tree Genetics & Genomes.

[17]  F. Damatta,et al.  Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. , 2004 .

[18]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Intraspecific functional variability: extent, structure and sources of variation , 2010 .

[19]  Eric Garnier,et al.  A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review , 2012, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[20]  S. Thomas.  Age-Related Changes in Tree Growth and Functional Biology: The Role of Reproduction , 2011 .

[21]  Shibu Jose,et al.  Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview , 2009, Agroforestry Systems.

[22]  Cassia F. Read,et al.  Gradients of light availability and leaf traits with leaf age and canopy position in 28 Australian shrubs and trees. , 2006, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[23]  F. Damatta,et al.  Seasonal changes in photoprotective mechanisms of leaves from shaded and unshaded field-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) trees , 2008, Trees.

[24]  Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al.  Masting in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) depletes stored nutrients. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[25]  J. Baltzer,et al.  Determinants of whole‐plant light requirements in Bornean rain forest tree saplings , 2007 .

[26]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[27]  M. Kleyer,et al.  Plant leaf economics and reproductive investment are responsive to gradients of land use intensity , 2011 .

[28]  F. Bazzaz.  The Physiological Ecology of Plant Succession , 1979 .

[29]  Olivier Roupsard,et al.  Leaf area index as an indicator of ecosystem services and management practices: An application for coffee agroforestry , 2014 .

[30]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Quantifying the relevance of intraspecific trait variability for functional diversity , 2011 .

[31]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  J. Dauzat,et al.  Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: I. A review of quantitative information on physiological and ecological processes , 2010, Agroforestry Systems.

[33]  S. Thomas.  Photosynthetic capacity peaks at intermediate size in temperate deciduous trees. , 2010, Tree physiology.

[34]  Allison M. Leach,et al.  The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[36]  P. C. Cavatte,et al.  Could shading reduce the negative impacts of drought on coffee? A morphophysiological analysis. , 2012, Physiologia plantarum.

[37]  Adam R. Martin,et al.  Size-dependent changes in leaf and wood chemical traits in two Caribbean rainforest trees. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[38]  H. Lambers,et al.  Trait correlation networks: a whole-plant perspective on the recently criticized leaf economic spectrum. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[39]  D. Wardle,et al.  The within‐species leaf economic spectrum does not predict leaf litter decomposability at either the within‐species or whole community levels , 2013 .

[40]  J. Grover.  Competition for light , 1997 .

[41]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[42]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[43]  P. Reich,et al.  A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility , 2009 .

[44]  M. Werger,et al.  Foliar nutrients in relation to growth, allocation and leaf traits in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1997, Oecologia.

[45]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[46]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Variation in leaf and twig CO2 flux as a function of plant size: a comparison of seedlings, saplings and trees. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[47]  C. Staver,et al.  Coffee agroecosystem performance under full sun, shade, conventional and organic management regimes in Central America , 2011, Agroforestry Systems.

[48]  D. Sigee.  Competition for Light , 2005 .

[49]  P. C. Cavatte,et al.  Morphological and physiological acclimations of coffee seedlings to growth over a range of fixed or changing light supplies , 2014 .

[50]  César Tejeda-Cruz,et al.  Why Shade Coffee Does Not Guarantee Biodiversity Conservation. , 2010 .

[51]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[52]  S. Thomas.  Asymptotic height as a predictor of growth and allometric characteristics in malaysian rain forest trees , 1996 .

[53]  K. Kitajima.  Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees , 1994, Oecologia.

[54]  A. S. Evans,et al.  The Evolution of Plant Ecophysiological Traits: Recent Advances and Future Directions , 2000 .

[55]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[56]  Sabrina Gaba,et al.  Agroecological weed control using a functional approach: a review of cropping systems diversity , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[57]  Brian J McGill,et al.  How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait-based ecology. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[58]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Plastic Phenotypic Response to Light of 16 Congeneric Shrubs From a Panamanian Rainforest , 2000 .

[59]  H. Martinez,et al.  Production and vegetative growth of coffee trees under fertilization and shade levels , 2010 .

[60]  L. García-Barrios,et al.  Ecological interactions, management lessons and design tools in tropical agroforestry systems , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[61]  Marc Dorel,et al.  A trait-based characterization of cover plants to assess their potential to provide a set of ecological services in banana cropping systems , 2014 .

[62]  S. Lavorel,et al.  On the importance of intraspecific variability for the quantification of functional diversity , 2012 .

[63]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[64]  Sabrina Gaba,et al.  Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species’ response to management practices , 2012 .

[65]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  Ontogenetic changes in leaf size in Malaysian rain forest trees , 1995 .

[66]  S. Pacala,et al.  Global Leaf Trait Relationships: Mass, Area, and the Leaf Economics Spectrum , 2013, Science.

[67]  Ü. Niinemets.  The controversy over traits conferring shade‐tolerance in trees: ontogenetic changes revisited , 2006 .

[68]  J. Beer,et al.  Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of coffee fine roots under Erythrina shade trees and contrasting soil management , 2013, Agroforestry Systems.