Lower Hospital Volume Is Associated With Higher In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the NCDR
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jill R Horwitz,et al. Expansion of Invasive Cardiac Services in the United States , 2013, Circulation.
[2] I. Piña,et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Revise , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] D. Kent,et al. Evidence of Systematic Duplication by New Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Programs , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[4] J. Messenger,et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] J. Messenger,et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Data Quality Brief: the NCDR Data Quality Program in 2012. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] P. Heidenreich,et al. Physician Procedure Volume and Complications of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation , 2012, Circulation.
[7] Harlan M Krumholz,et al. Improvements in Door-to-Balloon Time in the United States, 2005 to 2010 , 2011, Circulation.
[8] Daniel Polsky,et al. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. , 2011, JAMA.
[9] Joshua T. Cohen,et al. Comparative Effectiveness of ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Regionalization Strategies , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[10] P. Post,et al. The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, European heart journal.
[11] Elizabeth R DeLong,et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] H. Krumholz,et al. Choice of Reperfusion Strategy at Hospitals With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Analysis , 2009, Circulation.
[13] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. Association of hospital primary angioplasty volume in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with quality and outcomes. , 2009, JAMA.
[14] Harlan M Krumholz,et al. Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[15] S. Hailpern,et al. Effect of physician volume on the relationship between hospital volume and mortality during primary angioplasty. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] J. Jollis. The New York State Primary Angioplasty Registry and procedural volume. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[17] R. Wilensky,et al. Twenty-Year Evolution of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Sponsored, Multicenter 1985–1986 PTCA and 1997–2006 Dynamic Registries , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[18] H. White,et al. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, JAMA.
[19] E. Antman,et al. Selection of the optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI: does time matter? , 2006, European heart journal.
[20] H. Krumholz,et al. Driving Times and Distances to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Implications for Prehospital Triage of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Circulation.
[21] Samin K. Sharma,et al. Volume-Outcome Relationships for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Stent Era , 2005, Circulation.
[22] H. Krumholz,et al. Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[23] L. Klein,et al. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current "stent era" of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry). , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.
[24] R. Kaplan,et al. Volume-Outcome Relation for Physicians and Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State , 2001, Circulation.
[25] David O. Williams,et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Revision of the 1993 PTCA Guidelines)—Executive Summary , 2001 .
[26] H. White,et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. , 2001, JAMA.
[27] J. Rumsfeld,et al. Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy. , 2000, JAMA.
[28] T. Ryan,et al. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. , 2000, JAMA.
[29] C M Gibson,et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.
[30] W. Rogers,et al. The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.
[31] S. Ellis,et al. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. , 1997, Circulation.
[32] T. Ryan. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.