Biomechanical Models for Radial Distance Detection by Rat Vibrissae Abbreviated title : Out from the Snout

Rats use active, rhythmic movements of their whiskers to acquire tactile information about three-dimensional object features. There are no receptors along the length of the whisker; therefore all tactile information must be mechanically transduced back to receptors at the whisker base. This raises the question: how might the rat determine the radial contact position of an object along the whisker? We developed two complementary biomechanical models that demonstrate that the rat could determine radial object distance by monitoring the rate of change of moment (or equivalently, the rate of change of curvature) at the whisker base. The first model is used to explore the effects of taper and inherent whisker curvature on whisker deformation, and then used to predict the shapes of real rat whiskers during deflections at different radial distances. Predicted shapes closely matched experimental measurements. The second model describes the relationship between radial object distance and the moment at the base of a tapered, inherently curved whisker. Together, these models can account for recent recordings showing that some trigeminal ganglion (Vg) neurons encode closer radial distances with increased firing rates. The models also suggest that four and only four physical variables at the whisker base – angular position, angular velocity, moment, and rate of change of moment – are needed to describe the dynamic state of a whisker. We interpret these results in the context of our evolving hypothesis that neural responses in Vg can be represented using a state-encoding scheme that includes combinations of these four variables.

[1]  E. Jouini,et al.  Behavioral Properties of the Representative Agent , 2009 .

[2]  M. A. Neimark,et al.  Vibrissa Resonance as a Transduction Mechanism for Tactile Encoding , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Joseph H. Solomon,et al.  Biomechanics: Robotic whiskers used to sense features , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Lauren M Jones,et al.  Precise temporal responses in whisker trigeminal neurons. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Michael G. Paulin,et al.  Dynamics and the single spike , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[6]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  E. Ahissar,et al.  Responses of trigeminal ganglion neurons to the radial distance of contact during active vibrissal touch. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Michael G. Paulin,et al.  System Identification of Spiking Sensory Neurons Using Realistically Constrained Nonlinear Time Series Models , 1996 .

[9]  E. Guic-Robles,et al.  Rats can learn a roughness discrimination using only their vibrissal system , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  R. Frostig,et al.  Whisker-based discrimination of object orientation determined with a rapid training paradigm , 2005, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[11]  M. A. Neimark,et al.  Neural Correlates of Vibrissa Resonance Band-Pass and Somatotopic Representation of High-Frequency Stimuli , 2004, Neuron.

[12]  M. Nicolelis,et al.  Behavioral Properties of the Trigeminal Somatosensory System in Rats Performing Whisker-Dependent Tactile Discriminations , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Simons,et al.  Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Simons,et al.  Coding of deflection velocity and amplitude by whisker primary afferent neurons: implications for higher level processing. , 2000, Somatosensory & motor research.

[15]  E. Ahissar,et al.  Encoding of Vibrissal Active Touch , 2003, Neuron.

[16]  Ben Mitchinson,et al.  Feedback control in active sensing: rat exploratory whisking is modulated by environmental contact , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  D. Simons,et al.  Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to movements of vibrissae in different directions. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[18]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Mechanical Characteristics of Rat Vibrissae: Resonant Frequencies and Damping in Isolated Whiskers and in the Awake Behaving Animal , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  S. B. Vincent The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat , 1912 .

[20]  N. Wittenburg,et al.  Transformation from temporal to rate coding in a somatosensory thalamocortical pathway , 2022 .

[21]  Ehud Ahissar,et al.  Figuring Space by Time , 2001, Neuron.

[22]  M. Brecht,et al.  Functional architecture of the mystacial vibrissae , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  Karen A Moxon,et al.  Relationship between physiological response type (RA and SA) and vibrissal receptive field of neurons within the rat trigeminal ganglion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Michael G. Paulin,et al.  Optimal firing rate estimation , 2001, Neural Networks.

[25]  M. Scott Blood supply of mystacial vibrissae. , 1955, Nature.

[26]  Per Magne Knutsen,et al.  Haptic Object Localization in the Vibrissal System: Behavior and Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  F. Rice,et al.  Sensory innervation in the inner conical body of the vibrissal follicle‐sinus complex of the rat , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  F. Rice,et al.  Similarities and differences in the innervation of mystacial vibrissal follicle–sinus complexes in the rat and cat: A confocal microscopic study , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Cornelius Schwarz,et al.  Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to longitudinal whisker stimulation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  F. Rice,et al.  Comprehensive immunofluorescence and lectin binding analysis of vibrissal follicle sinus complex innervation in the mystacial pad of the rat , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.