UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) What ' s in a name : a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the name-letter effect

People generally prefer their initials to the other letters of the alphabet, a phenomenon known as the name-letter effect. This effect, researchers have argued, makes people move to certain cities, buy particular brands of consumer products, and choose particular professions (e.g., Angela moves to Los Angeles, Phil buys a Philips TV, and Dennis becomes a dentist). In order to establish such associations between people’s initials and their behavior, researchers typically carry out statistical analyses of large databases. Current methods of analysis ignore the hierarchical structure of the data, do not naturally handle order-restrictions, and are fundamentally incapable of confirming the null hypothesis. Here we outline a Bayesian hierarchical analysis that avoids these limitations and allows coherent inference both on the level of the individual and on the level of the group. To illustrate our method, we re-analyze two data sets that address the question of whether people are disproportionately likely to live in cities that resemble their name.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[3]  C. J. Burke,et al.  The use and misuse of the chi-square test. , 1949, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  H. D. De Kanter [The philosophy of statistics]. , 1972, Ginecología y Obstetricia de México.

[5]  J. M. Nuttin Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect , 1985 .

[6]  J. M. Nuttin Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages , 1987 .

[7]  V. Hoorens,et al.  The name letter effect: Attachment to self or primacy of own name writing? , 1988 .

[8]  J. M. Nuttin,et al.  Mastery pleasure versus mere ownership: A quasi-experimental cross-cultural and cross-alphabetical test of the name letter effect , 1990 .

[9]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[10]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  A Language and Program for Complex Bayesian Modelling , 1994 .

[11]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1: Distribution Theory. , 1995 .

[12]  L. Wasserman,et al.  A Reference Bayesian Test for Nested Hypotheses and its Relationship to the Schwarz Criterion , 1995 .

[13]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Computing Bayes Factors Using a Generalization of the Savage-Dickey Density Ratio , 1995 .

[14]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[15]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2b: Bayesian Inference. , 1996 .

[16]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Implicit Self-Esteem in Japan: Name Letters and Birthday Numbers , 1997 .

[17]  Young K. Truong,et al.  Polynomial splines and their tensor products in extended linear modeling: 1994 Wald memorial lecture , 1997 .

[18]  A. Raftery,et al.  Estimating Bayes Factors via Posterior Simulation with the Laplace—Metropolis Estimator , 1997 .

[19]  J. Hintze,et al.  Violin plots : A box plot-density trace synergism , 1998 .

[20]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[21]  B. Pelham,et al.  Name letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self-regulation. , 2002 .

[22]  B. Pelham,et al.  Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: implicit egotism and major life decisions. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  M. Gallucci I sell seashells by the seashore and my name is Jack: comment on Pelham, Mirenberg, and Jones (2002). , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  B. Pelham,et al.  Assessing the validity of implicit egotism: a reply to Gallucci (2003). , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Peter Congdon,et al.  Applied Bayesian Modelling , 2003 .

[26]  B. Pelham,et al.  How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  D. Ankerst,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2B: Bayesian Inference , 2005 .

[28]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Testing the Generality of the Name Letter Effect: Name Initials and Everyday Attitudes , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  Jun Lu,et al.  An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  B. Pelham,et al.  Implicit Egotism , 2005, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[31]  M. Lee,et al.  Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: comment on Trafimow (2003). , 2005, Psychological review.

[32]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R , 2005 .

[34]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Name Letter Branding: Valence Transfers When Product Specific Needs Are Active , 2005 .

[35]  P. Gustafson,et al.  Conservative prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models , 2006 .

[36]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  A Bayesian Perspective on Hypothesis Testing , 2006, Psychological science.

[37]  A. Gelman,et al.  The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant , 2006 .

[38]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Moniker Maladies: When Names Sabotage Success , 2007 .

[39]  Jun Lu,et al.  Signal Detection Models with Random Participant and Item Effects , 2007 .

[40]  H. Hoijtink,et al.  Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses. , 2008 .

[41]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical process-dissociation model. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Jie W Weiss,et al.  Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research , 2008 .

[43]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  A Survey of Model Evaluation Approaches With a Tutorial on Hierarchical Bayesian Methods , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  S. E. Ahmed,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 2008, Technometrics.

[45]  F. Anseel,et al.  Unconscious Applicants: A Systematic Test of the Name-Letter Effect , 2008, Psychological science.

[46]  Jess Chandler,et al.  In the “I” of the storm: Shared initials increase disaster donations , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[47]  C. Robert,et al.  Bayesian Modeling Using WinBUGS , 2009 .

[48]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[49]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[50]  Etienne P LeBel,et al.  How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name‐letter task , 2009 .

[51]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Importance of Proving the Null , 2022 .

[52]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  Towards Optimizing the Name Letter Test as a Measure of Implicit Self-esteem , 2009 .

[53]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[56]  B. McCullough,et al.  Baseball players with the initial “K” do not strike out more often , 2010 .

[57]  J. Kruschke Doing Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[58]  B. McCullough,et al.  Students with the Initial ‘A’ Don’t Get Better Grades , 2010 .

[59]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  J. Kruschke What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Spurious Also? Name Similarity Effects (Implicit Egotism) in Employer Decisions , 2010 .

[62]  U. Simonsohn Spurious? Name Similarity Effects (Implicit Egotism) in Marriage, Job and Moving Decisions , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  M. Lee How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. , 2011 .

[64]  U. Simonsohn In press at the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Total length: 5 pages, double-spaced. IN DEFENSE OF DILIGENCE: A REJOINDER TO PELHAM AND CARVALLO , 2011 .

[65]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[66]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Cognitive model decomposition of the BART: Assessment and application , 2011 .

[67]  S. Paunonen,et al.  Sexy But Often Unreliable: The Impact of Unreliability on the Replicability of Experimental Findings With Implicit Measures , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[68]  U. Simonsohn In defense of diligence: A rejoinder to Pelham and Carvallo (2011). , 2011 .

[69]  W. Johnson,et al.  Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data? , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  B. Pelham,et al.  The surprising potency of implicit egotism: A reply to Simonsohn. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[73]  M. Lee,et al.  Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course , 2014 .