A new paradigm in large-scale assembly—research priorities in measurement assisted assembly

This paper presents for the first time the concept of measurement assisted assembly (MAA) and outlines the research priorities of the realisation of this concept in the industry. MAA denotes a paradigm shift in assembly for high value and complex products and encompasses the development and use of novel metrology processes for the holistic integration and capability enhancement of key assembly and ancillary processes. A complete framework for MAA is detailed showing how this can facilitate a step change in assembly process capability and efficiency for large and complex products, such as airframes, where traditional assembly processes exhibit the requirement for rectification and rework, use inflexible tooling and are largely manual, resulting in cost and cycle time pressures. The concept of MAA encompasses a range of innovative measurement-assisted processes which enable rapid part-to-part assembly, increased use of flexible automation, traceable quality assurance and control, reduced structure weight and improved levels of precision across the dimensional scales. A full scale industrial trial of MAA technologies has been carried out on an experimental aircraft wing demonstrating the viability of the approach while studies within 140 smaller companies have highlighted the need for better adoption of existing process capability and quality control standards. The identified research priorities for MAA include the development of both frameless and tooling embedded automated metrology networks. Other research priorities relate to the development of integrated dimensional variation management, thermal compensation algorithms as well as measurement planning and inspection of algorithms linking design to measurement and process planning.

[1]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Performance of engineering consultants in ISO 9000‐based quality management systems implementation , 2005 .

[2]  Ian Moore,et al.  Automated Wing Drilling System for the A380-GRAWDE , 2003 .

[3]  Sara Eastwood,et al.  A Framework to Support Component Design in Jigless Manufacturing , 1999 .

[4]  D. F. Howell,et al.  Frequency scanning interferometry in ATLAS: remote, multiple, simultaneous and precise distance measurements in a hostile environment , 2004 .

[5]  Benjamen Hempstead,et al.  Composite Automatic Wing Drilling Equipment (CAWDE) , 2006 .

[6]  Hyungsuck Cho,et al.  Active Force Feedback Control for Assembly Processes Using a Flexible and Sensible Robot Wrist , 1985 .

[7]  Lutz Neugebauer,et al.  Automated Fastening and Milling Machine for Complex Aircraft Structures , 2005 .

[8]  Andrew Williamson,et al.  Jigless Aerospace Manufacture-The Enabling Technologies , 1999 .

[9]  Martin Leary,et al.  Computer Aided Tolerancing (CAT) platform for the design of assemblies under external and internal forces , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  LARGE SCALE METROLOGY IN AEROSPACE ASSEMBLY , 2008 .

[11]  Sara Eastwood,et al.  Industrial Robot : An International Journal Automated aerostructure assembly , 2016 .

[12]  P. Maropoulos,et al.  Modelling and optimization of novel laser multilateration schemes for high-precision applications , 2005 .

[13]  E. Mikhail,et al.  Introduction to modern photogrammetry , 2001 .

[14]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  MEASUREMENT ASSISTED ASSEMBLY AND THE ROADMAP TO PART- TO-PART ASSEMBLY , 2011 .

[15]  D. F. Howell,et al.  Coordinate measurement in 2-D and 3-D geometries using frequency scanning interferometry , 2005 .

[16]  Joseph Matthew Calkins,et al.  Quantifying Coordinate Uncertainty Fields in Coupled Spatial Measurement systems , 2002 .

[17]  Mark Summers Robot Capability Test and Development of Industrial Robot Positioning System for the Aerospace Industry , 2005 .

[18]  Ken Young,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the modern industrial robot , 2000 .

[19]  Parag Vichare,et al.  Early design verification of complex assembly variability using a Hybrid – Model Based and Physical Testing – Methodology , 2011 .

[20]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[21]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  Metrology Enhanced Tooling for Aerospace (META): Strategies for Improved Accuracy of Jig Built Structures , 2011 .

[22]  Eric Whinnem,et al.  Development of Orbital Drilling for the Boeing 787 , 2008 .

[23]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  The Metrology Enhanced Tooling for Aerospace (META) Framework , 2010 .

[24]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[25]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  METROLOGY ENHANCED TOOLING FOR AEROSPACE (META): A LIVE FIXTURING, WING BOX ASSEMBLY CASE STUDY , 2011 .

[26]  Brian Rooks,et al.  Automatic wing box assembly developments , 2001 .

[27]  J. Bradley,et al.  Best in class: a good principle for antibiotic usage to limit resistance development? , 2007, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[28]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  Integrated Dimensional Variation Management in the Digital Factory , 2011 .

[29]  Jianjun Shi,et al.  Stream of Variation Modeling and Analysis for Multistage Manufacturing Processes , 2006 .

[30]  Steve Smith,et al.  HAWDE five axis wing surface drilling machine , 2004 .

[31]  Bart Simpson,et al.  Integration of Machining and Inspection in Aerospace Manufacturing , 2011, MSE 2011.