An Analysis of Port Selection

The objective of this research is to study the competition among ports. In particular we study the relation between port characteristics and port market share of maritime traffic. Maritime carriers make two primary decisions that affect ports. In the long-term, they assign vessels to routes. In the short-term, they assign each shipment to a vessel and, with that vessel, a port. In this research, we assume that vessel schedules are fixed and model the assignment of shipments as a function of the attributes that describe each port. For a carrier, some assignments are simpler than other assignments. Each assignment should, however, take into account the same criteria. We begin by examining the scheduling of vessels for its effect on the assignment of shipments. We measure the impact of being a vessel's first or last port of call on a port's market share, and we discuss factors that might influence these schedules. We then examine the assignment to ports for exports of various commodity types as a function of geographic location (oceanic and inland distances), port characteristics (vessel capacity and port charges), and characteristics of vessel schedules (frequency and the order ofvisits). We use a multinomial choice model to analyze port choice. We find that the most significant factors are the geographic factors, which are beyond port control. The factors that ports can influence directly appear to be of far less significance. We also find that the choice processes vary with commodity type as well as carrier. The decisions are also found to differ between local and discretionary cargo. Our findings could affect decisions made by port managers as well as carriers or shippers. With the recognition of geographic advantages, port managers could focus marketing more effectively. Recognizing the impact of each carrier's schedules, they could suggest changes to carriers presently visiting the port or recruit new carriers to use present facilities more efficiently. Port managers could also evaluate more effectively investments designed to increase market share. Facilities or technologies could be incremented with a more accurate vision of future traffic levels at individual ports.

[1]  Koji Tsunokawa,et al.  Productivity and returns to scale of container ports , 1981 .

[2]  J. H. Foggin,et al.  DISAPPEARING HINTERLANDS : THE IMPACT OF THE LOGISTICS CONCEPT ON PORT COMPETITION , 1985 .

[3]  Wayne K. Talley THE ROLE OF US OCEAN PORTS IN PROMOTING AN EFFICIENT OCEAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM , 1988 .

[4]  T. Heaver,et al.  Planning and scheduling for efficiency in liner shipping , 1987 .

[5]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[6]  Helen B. Bendall,et al.  Cargo handling productivity. Part 2. The findings , 1988 .

[7]  I. Heggie,et al.  CHARGING FOR PORT FACILITIES , 1974 .

[8]  Yehuda Hayut Containerization and the Load Center Concept , 1981 .

[9]  I. Lewis,et al.  THE OCEAN SHIPPING REFORM ACT OF 1998 , 2000 .

[10]  Anastassios N. Perakis,et al.  OPTIMAL LINER FLEET ROUTEING STRATEGIES. , 1996 .

[11]  S J Meyrick,et al.  CARRIER SELECTION IN A RO/RO FERRY TRADE. , 1992 .

[12]  David Chappell,et al.  A note on the optimal handling capacity at a berth , 1979 .

[13]  W K Talley,et al.  OPTIMUM THROUGHPUT AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MARINE TERMINALS. IN: MARITIME TRANSPORT , 1988 .

[14]  Stephen Wanhill,et al.  Optimal handling capacity at a berth , 1976 .

[15]  Andrew F. Daughety,et al.  ESTIMATING SERVICE-DIFFERENTIATED TRANSPORT DEMAND FUNCTIONS , 1978 .

[16]  Andrew F. Daughety Freight transport demand revisited: A microeconomic view of multimodal, multicharacteristic service uncertainty and the demand for freight transport , 1979 .

[17]  D. McFadden Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice , 1981 .

[18]  Thomas J. Dowd US container terminal leasing and pricing , 1984 .

[19]  Clifford Winston,et al.  The demand for freight transportation: models and applications , 1983 .

[20]  Joan Al-Kazily Choice of technology for containerized shipping : a study of interaction between vessels and ports , 1979 .

[21]  Yehuda Hayuth,et al.  Load centering competition and modal integration , 1991 .

[22]  T. Oum A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY OF FREIGHT TRANSPORT DEMAND AND RAIL-TRUCK COMPETITION IN CANADA , 1979 .

[23]  G. M. D'este Carrier selection in a RO/RO ferry trade Part 2. Conceptual framework for the decision process , 1992 .

[24]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PORT PERFORMANCE AND EFFICIENCY , 1995 .

[25]  D J Taeledge DERIVED DEMAND FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORT AND INTER-MODAL COMPETITION IN CANADA , 1979 .

[26]  Ki-Chan Nam,et al.  A study on the estimation and aggregation of disaggregate models of mode choice for freight transport , 1997 .

[27]  Wayne K. Talley OPTIMAL CONTAINERSHIP SIZE , 1990 .

[28]  Seok-Min Lim Economies of scale in container shipping , 1998 .

[29]  E. Bardi,et al.  CARRIER SELECTION FROM ONE MODE , 1973 .

[30]  Helen B. Bendall,et al.  On measuring cargo handling productivity , 1987 .

[31]  A translog cost model of the bulk shipping industry , 1987 .

[32]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[33]  M R Brooks,et al.  AN ALTERNATIVE THEORETICAL APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF LINER SHIPPING : PART II, CHOICE CRITERIA MARY R. BROOKS , 1985 .

[34]  R. Goss,et al.  ECONOMIC POLICIES AND SEAPORTS. , 1990 .

[35]  J. O. Jansson,et al.  Economies of Scale of General Cargo Ships , 1978 .

[36]  R. Goss,et al.  Economic policies and seaports: Strategies for port authorities , 1990 .

[37]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[38]  Anastassios N. Perakis A SECOND LOOK AT FLEET DEPLOYMENT , 1985 .

[39]  J. D. Griffiths Optimal handling capacity at a berth , 1976 .

[40]  Wayne K. Talley,et al.  PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PORT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1994 .

[41]  W. Bruce Allen,et al.  The demand for freight transportation: A micro approach , 1977 .

[42]  Transport economics : selected readings , 1997 .

[43]  M. Brooks An alternative theoretical approach to the evaluation of liner shipping Part II. Choice criteria , 1985 .

[44]  D Luberoff,et al.  U.S. PORTS AND THE FUNDING OF INTERMODAL FACILITIES: AN OVERVIEW OF KEY ISSUES , 2000 .

[45]  J. B. Kenyon,et al.  Elements in Inter-Port Competition in the United States , 1970 .

[46]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[47]  Anastassios N. Perakis,et al.  Fleet deployment optimization for liner shipping Part 1. Background, problem formulation and solution approaches , 1991 .

[48]  J. Jansson,et al.  Liner Shipping Economics , 1987 .

[49]  D Shneerson,et al.  A MODEL OF SCHEDULED LINER FREIGHT SERVICES : BALANCING INVENTORY COST AGAINST SHIPOWNERS' COSTS , 1985 .

[50]  J. D. Griffiths Unloading facilities at an iron-ore terminal , 1976 .

[51]  Siri Pettersen Strandenes,et al.  PORT PRICING AND COMPETITIVENESS IN SHORT SEA SHIPPING , 2000 .

[52]  Harry Benford,et al.  A simple approach to fleet deployment , 1981 .

[53]  Tae Hoon Oum,et al.  DERIVED DEMAND FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORT AND INTERMODAL COMPETITION IN CANADA , 1979 .

[54]  Tae Hoon Oum,et al.  A Warning on the Use of Linear Logit Models in Transport Mode Choice Studies , 1979 .

[55]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[56]  Wayne K. Talley Port pricing: a cost axiomatic approach , 1994 .

[57]  Jon S Helmick CONCENTRATION AND CONNECTIVITY IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC LINER PORT NETWORK, 1970-1990. , 1994 .

[58]  Clifford Winston,et al.  A Disaggregate Model of the Demand for Intercity Freight Transportation , 1981 .

[59]  P. Zarembka Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[60]  Claire Lyons DREDGING CRISIS AT PONY&NJ. , 1996 .

[61]  B. Slack CONTAINERIZATION, INTER-PORT COMPETITION, AND PORT SELECTION , 1985 .

[62]  J. Tongzon THE IMPACT OF WHARFAGE COSTS ON VICTORIA'S EXPORT-ORIENTED INDUSTRIES , 1989 .

[63]  K. Boyer Minimum Rate Regulation, Modal Split Sensitivities, and the Railroad Problem , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.