AGN host galaxies at redshift z 0.7: peculiar or not?

Aims. We perform a quantitative morphological comparison between the hosts of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and quiescent galaxies at intermediate redshifts (z ≈ 0.7). The imaging data are taken from the large HST/ACS mosaics of the GEMS and STAGES surveys. Our main aim is to test whether nuclear activity at this cosmic epoch is triggered by major mergers. Methods. Using images of quiescent galaxies and stars, we created synthetic AGN images to investigate the impact of an optical nucleus on the morphological analysis of AGN hosts. Galaxy morphologies are parameterized using the asymmetry index A ,t he concentration index C, the Gini coefficient G ,a nd theM20 index. A sample of ∼200 synthetic AGN was matched to 21 real AGN in terms of redshift, host brightness, and host-to-nucleus ratio to ensure a reliable comparison between active and quiescent galaxies. Results. The optical nuclei strongly affect the morphological parameters of the underlying host galaxy. Taking these effects into account, we find that the morphologies of the AGN hosts are clearly distinct from galaxies undergoing violent gravitational interactions. Indeed, the host galaxy distributions in morphological descriptor space are more similar to undisturbed galaxies than to major mergers. Conclusions. Intermediate-luminosity (LX < 10 44 erg/s) AGN hosts at z ≈ 0.7 show morphologies similar to the general population of massive galaxies with significant bulges at the same redshifts. If major mergers are the driver of nuclear activity at this epoch, the signatures of gravitational interactions fade rapidly before the optical AGN phase starts, making them undetectable on single-orbit HST images, at least with usual morphological descriptors. This could be investigated in future synthetic observations created from numerical simulations of galaxy-galaxy interactions.

[1]  L. Ho,et al.  THE IMPACT OF GALAXY INTERACTIONS ON ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS ACTIVITY IN zCOSMOS , 2011, 1109.1292.

[2]  W. Brandt,et al.  SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE GROWTH IN STARBURST GALAXIES OVER COSMIC TIME: CONSTRAINTS FROM THE DEEPEST CHANDRA FIELDS , 2011, 1108.3229.

[3]  David R. Patton,et al.  Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - IV: Interactions trigger AGN , 2011, 1108.2711.

[4]  K. Schawinski,et al.  HST WFC3/IR OBSERVATIONS OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS HOST GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2: SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES GROW IN DISK GALAXIES , 2010, 1012.1855.

[5]  Shaohua Zhang,et al.  X-RAY PROPERTIES OF NARROW-LINE SEYFERT 1 GALAXIES WITH VERY SMALL BROADLINE WIDTHS , 2010, 1011.3283.

[6]  Takamitsu Miyaji,et al.  THE BULK OF THE BLACK HOLE GROWTH SINCE z ∼ 1 OCCURS IN A SECULAR UNIVERSE: NO MAJOR MERGER–AGN CONNECTION , 2010, 1009.3265.

[7]  K. Jahnke,et al.  THE NON-CAUSAL ORIGIN OF THE BLACK-HOLE–GALAXY SCALING RELATIONS , 2010, 1006.0482.

[8]  C. Conselice,et al.  The Effects of an AGN on Host Galaxy Colour and Morphology Measurements , 2010, 1002.2365.

[9]  J. Trump,et al.  ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS HOST GALAXY MORPHOLOGIES IN COSMOS , 2009 .

[10]  David A. Green,et al.  STAGES: the Space Telescope A901/2 Galaxy Evolution Survey , 2008, 0811.3890.

[11]  H. Hildebrandt,et al.  Calibration update of the COMBO-17 CDFS catalogue , 2008, 0809.2066.

[12]  L. Ho,et al.  Decomposition of the Host Galaxies of Active Galactic Nuclei Using Hubble Space Telescope Images , 2008, 0807.1334.

[13]  Joel R. Primack,et al.  Galaxy merger morphologies and time-scales from simulations of equal-mass gas-rich disc mergers , 2008, 0805.1246.

[14]  C. Urry,et al.  The Accuracy of Morphological Decomposition of Active Galactic Nucleus Host Galaxies , 2008, 0804.1363.

[15]  Y. Mellier,et al.  The dark matter environment of the Abell 901/902 supercluster: a weak lensing analysis of the HST STAGES survey , 2008, 0801.1156.

[16]  N. Bennert,et al.  Evidence for Merger Remnants in Early-Type Host Galaxies of Low-Redshift QSOs , 2008, 0801.0832.

[17]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Is AGN feedback necessary to form red elliptical galaxies? , 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[18]  C. Peng How Mergers May Affect the Mass Scaling Relation between Gravitationally Bound Systems , 2007 .

[19]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  Interactions, star formation and AGN activity , 2007, 0712.0383.

[20]  W. Brandt,et al.  The Evolution of AGN Host Galaxies: From Blue to Red and the Influence of Large-Scale Structures , 2007, 0709.3455.

[21]  K. Schawinski,et al.  Observational evidence for AGN feedback in early-type galaxies , 2007, 0709.3015.

[22]  P. Hopkins,et al.  A Cosmological Framework for the Co-Evolution of Quasars, Supermassive Black Holes, and Elliptical Galaxies. I. Galaxy Mergers and Quasar Activity , 2007, 0706.1243.

[23]  Sergey E. Koposov,et al.  GEMS: Galaxy Fitting Catalogs and Testing Parametric Galaxy Fitting Codes: GALFIT and GIM2D , 2007, 0704.2601.

[24]  C. Peng How Mergers May Affect The Mass Scaling Relations Between Black Holes, Galaxies, and Other Gravita , 2007, 0704.1860.

[25]  A. Myers,et al.  Clustering Analyses of 300,000 Photometrically Classified Quasars. II. The Excess on Very Small Scales , 2006, astro-ph/0612191.

[26]  H. Rix,et al.  The stellar masses of 25 000 galaxies at 0.2 ≤ z ≤ 1.0 estimated by the COMBO-17 survey , 2006 .

[27]  G. Richards,et al.  An Observational Determination of the Bolometric Quasar Luminosity Function , 2006, astro-ph/0605678.

[28]  G. Richards,et al.  The Small-Scale Environment of Quasars , 2006, astro-ph/0601522.

[29]  H. Rix,et al.  GEMS Survey Data and Catalog , 2005, astro-ph/0510782.

[30]  C. Conselice Early and Rapid Merging as a Formation Mechanism of Massive Galaxies: Empirical Constraints , 2005, astro-ph/0507146.

[31]  S. Ravindranath,et al.  AGN Host Galaxies at z ~ 0.4-1.3: Bulge-dominated and Lacking Merger-AGN Connection , 2005, astro-ph/0507091.

[32]  C. Urry,et al.  Host Galaxy Evolution in Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei , 2005 .

[33]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Extended Chandra Deep Field-South Survey: Chandra Point-Source Catalogs , 2005, astro-ph/0506607.

[34]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  Binary Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Evidence for Excess Clustering on Small Scales , 2005, astro-ph/0504535.

[35]  T. D. Matteo,et al.  Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies , 2005, Nature.

[36]  Christian Wolf,et al.  Colors of Active Galactic Nucleus Host Galaxies at 0.5 < z < 1.1 from the GEMS Survey , 2004 .

[37]  A. Cimatti,et al.  A catalogue of the Chandra Deep Field South with multi-colour classification and photometric redshifts from COMBO-17 , 2004, astro-ph/0403666.

[38]  H. Rix,et al.  Colors of AGN host galaxies at 0.5 , 2004, astro-ph/0403645.

[39]  H. Rix,et al.  Ultraviolet Light from Young Stars in GEMS Quasar Host Galaxies at 1.8 < z < 2.75 , 2004, astro-ph/0403462.

[40]  Hans-Walter Rix,et al.  On the Black Hole Mass-Bulge Mass Relation , 2004, astro-ph/0402376.

[41]  H. Rix,et al.  GEMS: Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDs , 2004, astro-ph/0401427.

[42]  Timothy M. Heckman,et al.  The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei , 2003 .

[43]  P. Madau,et al.  A New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classification , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.

[44]  A. Marconi,et al.  The Relation between Black Hole Mass, Bulge Mass, and Near-Infrared Luminosity , 2003, astro-ph/0304274.

[45]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  The Host Galaxies of AGN , 2003, astro-ph/0304239.

[46]  Oxford,et al.  The COMBO-17 survey: Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function from 25,000 galaxies with 0.2 < z < 1.2 , 2002, astro-ph/0208345.

[47]  L. Ho,et al.  Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.

[48]  E. al.,et al.  Composite Quasar Spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2001, astro-ph/0105231.

[49]  G. Canalizo,et al.  Quasi-Stellar Objects, Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies, and Mergers , 2001, astro-ph/0103332.

[50]  Ralf Bender,et al.  A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion , 2000, astro-ph/0006289.

[51]  D. Merritt,et al.  A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0006053.

[52]  M. Bershady,et al.  The Asymmetry of Galaxies: Physical Morphology for Nearby and High-Redshift Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9907399.

[53]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[54]  B. Santiago,et al.  Galaxy morphology to I = 25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field , 1996, astro-ph/9602044.

[55]  P. Padovani,et al.  UNIFIED SCHEMES FOR RADIO-LOUD ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI , 1995, astro-ph/9506063.

[56]  L. Hernquist,et al.  Excitation of Activity in Galaxies by Minor Mergers , 1995, astro-ph/9501090.