The stabilizing properties of foot yaw in human walking.

Humans perform a variety of feedback adjustments to maintain balance during walking. These include lateral footfall placement, and center of pressure adjustment under the stance foot, to stabilize lateral balance. A less appreciated possibility would be to steer for balance like a bicycle, whose front wheel may be turned toward the direction of a lean to capture the center of mass. Humans could potentially combine steering with other strategies to distribute balance adjustments across multiple degrees of freedom. We tested whether human balance can theoretically benefit from steering, and experimentally tested for evidence of steering for balance. We first developed a simple dynamic walking model, which shows that bipedal walking may indeed be stabilized through steering-externally rotating the foot about vertical toward the direction of lateral lean for each footfall-governed by linear feedback control. Moreover, least effort (mean-square control torque) is required if steering is combined with lateral foot placement. If humans use such control, footfall variability should show a statistical coupling between external rotation with lateral placement. We therefore examined the spontaneous fluctuations of hundreds of strides of normal overground walking in healthy adults (N=26). We found significant coupling (P=9·10-8), of 0.54rad of external rotation per meter of lateral foot deviation. Successive footfalls showed a weaker, negative correlation with each other, similar to how a bicycle׳s steering adjustment made for balance must be followed by gradual corrections to resume the original travel direction. Steering may be one of multiple strategies to stabilize balance during walking.

[1]  A. Kuo,et al.  Energetic cost of walking with increased step variability. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[2]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  A 3D passive dynamic biped with yaw and roll compensation , 2001, Robotica.

[3]  John R. Rebula,et al.  Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[4]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Arthur D. Kuo,et al.  Stabilization of Lateral Motion in Passive Dynamic Walking , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[7]  R. Kram,et al.  Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  J. Borenstein,et al.  Non-GPS Navigation for Security Personnel and First Responders , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[9]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Stepping Asymmetry Among Individuals With Unilateral Transtibial Limb Loss Might Be Functional in Terms of Gait Stability , 2014, Physical Therapy.

[10]  A. Kuo,et al.  Active control of lateral balance in human walking. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Steven H Collins,et al.  Once-per-step control of ankle-foot prosthesis push-off work reduces effort associated with balance during walking , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  A. Hof,et al.  Balance responses to lateral perturbations in human treadmill walking , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  S. Collins,et al.  Two Independent Contributions to Step Variability during Over-Ground Human Walking , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  A. Bryson Applied Linear Optimal Control: Examples and Alogrithms , 2002 .

[15]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Skateboards, Bicycles, and Three-dimensional Biped Walking Machines: Velocity-dependent Stability by Means of Lean-to-yaw Coupling , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Linearized dynamics equations for the balance and steer of a bicycle: a benchmark and review , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.