New graphics as computerized displays for human information processing

A comparative study of various graphic and tabular representations of financial and accounting statistics in an interactive decision setting is presented. Controls are placed on demographic variables, cognitive style, abilities, and math and computer anxiety. Bar graphics are found to be a faster but more accurate form of man-machine communication that tabular presentation of information in credit rating and industry classification decisions. Star graphics take more time on the part of the user but improve the ability to make decisions which involve ranking alternatives. Persons whose cognitive style is more directed toward thinking than feeling have significantly better success in utilizing new graphic forms. It is argues that all new graphics should be tested for speed and efficacy for different types of information display and for people with different cognitive styles and computer backgrounds before they are incorporated into outputs for computerised decision-support systems. >

[1]  James A. Senn,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments , 1977 .

[2]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[3]  D. Huff,et al.  Facial Representation of Multivariate Data , 1981 .

[4]  L ChervanyNorman,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems , 1977 .

[5]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[6]  Roger P. Dooley,et al.  Functional and Attention-Getting Effects of Color on Graphic Communications , 1970 .

[7]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[8]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  COMPUTER GRAPHICS AS DECISION AIDS: DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH* , 1984 .

[9]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Graphical Methods in Statistics , 1979 .

[10]  William S. Cleveland,et al.  Research in Statistical Graphics , 1987 .

[11]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making , 1981 .

[12]  Angelina Villarreal,et al.  PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF GRAPHIC AND TABULAR DISPLAYS OF MULTIVARIATE DATA , 1987 .

[13]  Shane Moriarity,et al.  Communicating Financial Information Through Multidimensional Graphics , 1979 .

[14]  J. Hartigan,et al.  Representing Points in Many Dimensions by Trees and Castles , 1981 .

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Color and Graphical Information Presentation Under Varying Time Constraints , 1986, MIS Q..

[16]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Minds and Managers: On the Dual Nature Of Human Information Processing And Management , 1981 .

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Graphical and Color-Enhanced Information Presentation , 1985 .

[18]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach , 1986, CACM.

[19]  William Remus,et al.  A Study of Graphical and Tabular Displays and Their Interaction with Environmental Complexity , 1987 .

[20]  David K. Simkin,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .

[21]  William Remus,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Graphical and Tabular Data Presentations on Decision Making , 1984 .

[22]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays , 1981 .

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF UNCERTAINTY IN THE ENVIRONMENT TO INFORMATION USED BY DECISION MAKERS , 1975 .