Effector and regulatory mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), one of the commonest occupational diseases, is a T‐cell‐mediated skin inflammation caused by repeated skin exposure to contact allergens, i.e. nonprotein chemicals called haptens. Allergic contact dermatitis, also referred to as contact hypersensitivity, is mediated by CD8+ T cells, which are primed in lymphoid organs during the sensitization phase and are recruited in the skin upon re‐exposure to the hapten. Subsets of CD4+ T cells endowed with suppressive activity are responsible for both the down‐regulation of eczema in allergic patients and the prevention of priming to haptens in nonallergic individuals. Therefore, ACD should be considered as a breakdown of the skin immune tolerance to haptens. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of ACD have demonstrated the important role of skin innate immunity in the sensitization process and have revisited the dogma that Langerhans cells are mandatory for CD8+ T‐cell priming. They have also introduced mast cells as a pivotal actor in the magnitude of the inflammatory reaction. Finally, the most recent studies address the nature, the mode and the site of action of the regulatory T cells that control the skin inflammation with the aim of developing new strategies of tolerance induction in allergic patients.

[1]  B. Malissen,et al.  Langerhans cells--revisiting the paradigm using genetically engineered mice. , 2006, Trends in immunology.

[2]  S. Martin,et al.  Structural complexity of antigenic determinants for class I MHC-restricted, hapten-specific T cells. Two qualitatively differing types of H-2Kb-restricted TNP epitopes. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[3]  M. Fujimoto,et al.  A regulatory B cell subset with a unique CD1dhiCD5+ phenotype controls T cell-dependent inflammatory responses. , 2008, Immunity.

[4]  Franca Ronchese,et al.  Perforin-dependent elimination of dendritic cells regulates the expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Askenase,et al.  T cell-dependent mast cell degranulation and release of serotonin in murine delayed-type hypersensitivity , 1980, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  A. Kolodkin,et al.  Semaphorin 7A initiates T-cell-mediated inflammatory responses through α1β1 integrin , 2007, Nature.

[7]  A. O’Garra,et al.  Regulatory T cells and mechanisms of immune system control , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[8]  A. Goubier,et al.  CD4+CD25+ T cells as key regulators of immune responses. , 2003, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[9]  James J. Campbell,et al.  The chemokine receptor CCR4 in vascular recognition by cutaneous but not intestinal memory T cells , 1999, Nature.

[10]  J. Simon,et al.  Dendritic Cell Immunization Route Determines CD8+ T Cell Trafficking to Inflamed Skin: Role for Tissue Microenvironment and Dendritic Cells in Establishment of T Cell-Homing Subsets1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  P. Matzinger The Danger Model: A Renewed Sense of Self , 2002, Science.

[12]  G. Nyman,et al.  Fragrance compound geraniol forms contact allergens on air exposure. Identification and quantification of oxidation products and effect on skin sensitization. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[13]  J. Nicolas,et al.  Skin contact irritation conditions the development and severity of allergic contact dermatitis. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[14]  R. Fairchild,et al.  T cell populations primed by hapten sensitization in contact sensitivity are distinguished by polarized patterns of cytokine production: interferon gamma-producing (Tc1) effector CD8+ T cells and interleukin (Il) 4/Il-10-producing (Th2) negative regulatory CD4+ T cells , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[15]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[16]  J. Simon,et al.  Peptide immunization indicates that CD8+ T cells are the dominant effector cells in trinitrophenyl-specific contact hypersensitivity. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[17]  Julia M. Lewis,et al.  Resident Skin-specific γδ T Cells Provide Local, Nonredundant Regulation of Cutaneous Inflammation , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  Luzheng Liu,et al.  Skin-Homing Receptors on Effector Leukocytes Are Differentially Sensitive to Glyco-Metabolic Antagonism in Allergic Contact Dermatitis1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  C. Griffiths,et al.  Epidermal Langerhans cell migration and sensitisation to chemical allergens , 2003, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[20]  T. Mosmann,et al.  CD8Tc1 and Tc2 cells secrete distinct cytokine patterns in vitro and in vivo but induce similar inflammatory reactions. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[21]  S. Martin,et al.  Peptide-conjugated hapten groups are the major antigenic determinants for trinitrophenyl-specific cytotoxic T cells. , 1992, International immunology.

[22]  N. Copeland,et al.  CTACK, a skin-associated chemokine that preferentially attracts skin-homing memory T cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. van Bergen,et al.  A New Type of Metal Recognition by Human T Cells , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  L. Heinzerling,et al.  Fucosyltransferase VII-Deficient Mice with Defective E-, P-, and L-Selectin Ligands Show Impaired CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Migration into the Skin, but Normal Extravasation into Visceral Organs1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[25]  J. Kehren,et al.  Skin Inflammation During Contact Hypersensitivity Is Mediated by Early Recruitment of CD8+ T Cytotoxic 1 Cells Inducing Keratinocyte Apoptosis1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[26]  K. Nishioka,et al.  Gammadelta T cells assist alphabeta T cells in the adoptive transfer of contact hypersensitivity to para-phenylenediamine. , 2001, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[27]  J. Ring,et al.  Multistep navigation of Langerhans/dendritic cells in and out of the skin. , 2001, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[28]  T. Jakob,et al.  From innate to adaptive immune responses in contact hypersensitivity , 2008, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[29]  Clare L. Bennett,et al.  Inducible ablation of mouse Langerhans cells diminishes but fails to abrogate contact hypersensitivity , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  J. Lepoittevin Molecular Aspects of Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 2001 .

[31]  G. Freeman,et al.  The B7 family revisited. , 2005, Annual review of immunology.

[32]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  Occupational skin disease in hospital cleaning and kitchen workers , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[33]  R. Fairchild,et al.  The intensity of neutrophil infiltration controls the number of antigen‐primed CD8 T cells recruited into cutaneous antigen challenge sites , 2004, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[34]  Yong‐jun Liu,et al.  OX40-OX40L interactions: a promising therapeutic target for allergic diseases? , 2007, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[35]  R. Lebbink,et al.  Non-MHC ligands for inhibitory immune receptors: novel insights and implications for immune regulation. , 2007, Molecular immunology.

[36]  J. Villadangos,et al.  Life cycle, migration and antigen presenting functions of spleen and lymph node dendritic cells: limitations of the Langerhans cells paradigm. , 2005, Seminars in immunology.

[37]  K. Nishioka,et al.  γδ T cells assist αβ T cells in the adoptive transfer of contact hypersensitivity to para‐phenylenediamine , 2001 .

[38]  K. Hogquist,et al.  Identification of a novel population of Langerin+ dendritic cells , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[39]  F. Bérard,et al.  CD8+ T cells are effector cells of contact dermatitis to common skin allergens in mice. , 2006, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[40]  Shimon Sakaguchi,et al.  Foxp3+CD25+CD4+ natural regulatory T cells in dominant self‐tolerance and autoimmune disease , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[41]  A. Kissenpfennig,et al.  Insights into Langerhans cell function from Langerhans cell ablation models , 2008, European journal of immunology.

[42]  J. Lepoittevin,et al.  Hapten-peptide-T cell receptor interactions: molecular basisfor the recognition of haptens by T lymphocytes , 2000 .

[43]  N. Bhatia Dermal Dendritic Cells, and Not Langerhans Cells, Play an Essential Role in Inducing an Immune Response , 2010 .

[44]  R. Bertini,et al.  The role of CXCR2 activity in the contact hypersensitivity response in mice. , 2006, European cytokine network.

[45]  P. Askenase,et al.  Invariant NKT Cells Rapidly Activated via Immunization with Diverse Contact Antigens Collaborate In Vitro with B-1 Cells to Initiate Contact Sensitivity1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  U. V. Andrian,et al.  T cell– and B cell–independent adaptive immunity mediated by natural killer cells , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[47]  J. Sirard,et al.  Dendritic cells rapidly recruited into epithelial tissues via CCR6/CCL20 are responsible for CD8+ T cell crosspriming in vivo. , 2006, Immunity.

[48]  T. Makino,et al.  Occupational cobalt induced systemic contact dermatitis. , 2009, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[49]  W. Pichler,et al.  Pharmacological interaction of drugs with immune receptors: the p-i concept. , 2006, Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology.

[50]  J. Penninger,et al.  Epidermal RANKL controls regulatory T-cell numbers via activation of dendritic cells , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[51]  Klaus E Andersen,et al.  Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[52]  A. Elbe-Bürger,et al.  MHC class I+/II- dendritic cells induce hapten-specific immune responses in vitro and in vivo. , 1997, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[53]  C. Albanesi,et al.  Disparate Cytotoxic Activity of Nickel-Specific CD8+ and CD4+ T Cell Subsets Against Keratinocytes1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[54]  J. Villadangos Hold on, the monocytes are coming! , 2007, Immunity.

[55]  E. Berg,et al.  IFN-gamma inhibits activation-induced expression of E- and P-selectin on endothelial cells. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[56]  Stephen J Galli,et al.  Mast cell–derived interleukin 10 limits skin pathology in contact dermatitis and chronic irradiation with ultraviolet B , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[57]  J. Kehren,et al.  Contact dermatitis I. Pathophysiology of contact sensitivity. , 1999, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[58]  G. Kollias,et al.  Mast Cells Control Neutrophil Recruitment during T Cell–Mediated Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reactions through Tumor Necrosis Factor and Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 2 , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[59]  T. Mosmann,et al.  Two types of murine helper T cell clone. II. Delayed-type hypersensitivity is mediated by TH1 clones. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[60]  P. Askenase,et al.  Identification of Initiator B Cells, a Novel Subset of Activation-Induced Deaminase-Dependent B-1-Like Cells That Mediate Initiation of Contact Sensitivity1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[61]  Kristina Luthman,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[62]  C. Albanesi,et al.  Interleukin-17 is produced by both Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes, and modulates interferon-gamma- and interleukin-4-induced activation of human keratinocytes. , 2000, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[63]  P. Askenase,et al.  Interleukin‐4‐dependent innate collaboration between iNKT cells and B‐1 B cells controls adaptative contact sensitivity , 2006, Immunology.

[64]  H. Muller,et al.  Effects of gliotoxin on Langerhans' cell function: contact hypersensitivity responses and skin graft survival. , 1990, Immunology.

[65]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Hapten–protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[66]  H. van Loveren,et al.  Cytokine production induced by low-molecular-weight chemicals as a function of the stimulation index in a modified local lymph node assay: an approach to discriminate contact sensitizers from respiratory sensitizers. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[67]  J. Simon,et al.  Fas-Mediated Inhibition of CD4+ T Cell Priming Results in Dominance of Type 1 CD8+ T Cells in the Immune Response to the Contact Sensitizer Trinitrophenyl1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[68]  A. Karlberg,et al.  Contact allergens formed on air exposure of linalool. Identification and quantification of primary and secondary oxidation products and the effect on skin sensitization. , 2004, Chemical research in toxicology.

[69]  J. Connolly,et al.  Disruption of E-cadherin-mediated adhesion induces a functionally distinct pathway of dendritic cell maturation. , 2007, Immunity.

[70]  S. Beissert,et al.  IL-12 Breaks Dinitrothiocyanobenzene (DNTB)-Mediated Tolerance and Converts the Tolerogen DNTB into an Immunogen1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[71]  S. Jameson,et al.  Langerin Expressing Cells Promote Skin Immune Responses under Defined Conditions1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[72]  L. Santamaria-Babí CLA(+) T cells in cutaneous diseases. , 2004, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[73]  P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli,et al.  Establishment of a cell line with features of early dendritic cell precursors from fetal mouse skin , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[74]  R. Fairchild,et al.  Development of effector CD8+ T cells in contact hypersensitivity occurs independently of CD4+ T cells. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[75]  K. Omura,et al.  Preferential contribution of B7‐H1 to programmed death‐1‐mediated regulation of hapten‐specific allergic inflammatory responses , 2003, European journal of immunology.

[76]  H. Reiser,et al.  Expression and function of B7‐1 and B7‐2 in hapten‐induced contact sensitivity , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[77]  G. Shearer,et al.  Hapten specific TNP-reactive cytotoxic effector cells using epidermal cells as targets. , 1981, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[78]  J. Villadangos,et al.  Migratory dendritic cells transfer antigen to a lymph node-resident dendritic cell population for efficient CTL priming. , 2006, Immunity.

[79]  T. Luger,et al.  Removal of the majority of epidermal Langerhans cells by topical or systemic steroid application enhances the effector phase of murine contact hypersensitivity. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[80]  P. Linsley,et al.  Expression and function of B7 on human epidermal Langerhans cells. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[81]  H. Merk,et al.  Skin: major target organ of allergic reactions to small molecular weight compounds. , 2007, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[82]  P. Askenase,et al.  Role of antigen-presenting cells in the development and persistence of contact hypersensitivity , 1980, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[83]  James J. Campbell,et al.  CC Chemokine Receptor (CCR)4 and the CCR10 Ligand Cutaneous T Cell–attracting Chemokine (CTACK) in Lymphocyte Trafficking to Inflamed Skin , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[84]  P. Perrin,et al.  Dynamics and function of Langerhans cells in vivo: dermal dendritic cells colonize lymph node areas distinct from slower migrating Langerhans cells. , 2005, Immunity.

[85]  A. Enk,et al.  Contact sensitivity as a model for T-cell activation in skin. , 1995, Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

[86]  J. Kehren,et al.  Dual role of dendritic cells in the induction and down-regulation of antigen-specific cutaneous inflammation. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[87]  K. Blaser,et al.  Allergen specificity and endothelial transmigration of T cells in allergic contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis are associated with the cutaneous lymphocyte antigen. , 1995, International archives of allergy and immunology.

[88]  Y. Iwakura,et al.  IFN‐γ and TNF‐α are involved in urushiol‐induced contact hypersensitivity in mice , 2005 .

[89]  R. Tamagawa‐Mineoka,et al.  The role of platelets in leukocyte recruitment in chronic contact hypersensitivity induced by repeated elicitation. , 2007, The American journal of pathology.

[90]  J. Rothbard,et al.  Characterization of epitopes recognized by hapten-specific CD4+ T cells. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[91]  E. Gleichmann,et al.  Cross‐sensitization to haptens: formation of common haptenic metabolites, T cell recognition of cryptic peptides, and true T cell cross‐reactivity , 2002, European journal of immunology.

[92]  R. Paus,et al.  IL-2-IgG2b fusion protein suppresses murine contact hypersensitivity in vivo. , 2002, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[93]  A. Enk,et al.  Induction of immunosuppressive functions of dendritic cells in vivo by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells: Role of B7‐H3 expression and antigen presentation , 2007, European journal of immunology.

[94]  F. Bérard,et al.  The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. , 2004, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[95]  A. Laporte,et al.  Processing of urushiol (poison ivy) hapten by both endogenous and exogenous pathways for presentation to T cells in vitro. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[96]  F. Bérard,et al.  Afferent and efferent phases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) can be induced after a single skin contact with haptens: evidence using a mouse model of primary ACD. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[97]  A. Kolodkin,et al.  Semaphorin 7A initiates T-cell-mediated inflammatory responses through alpha1beta1 integrin. , 2007, Nature.

[98]  M. Shlomchik,et al.  Epidermal langerhans cell-deficient mice develop enhanced contact hypersensitivity. , 2005, Immunity.

[99]  P. Askenase,et al.  B Cell–dependent T Cell Responses , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[100]  R. Fairchild,et al.  Induction and regulation of T-cell priming for contact hypersensitivity. , 2001, Critical reviews in immunology.

[101]  A. Rozières,et al.  Eczéma allergique de contact : Comment ré-induire une tolérance ? , 2006 .

[102]  J. Nicolas,et al.  Innate CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are required for oral tolerance and inhibition of CD8+ T cells mediating skin inflammation. , 2003, Blood.

[103]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[104]  D. Taub,et al.  Early Local Generation of C5a Initiates the Elicitation of Contact Sensitivity by Leading to Early T Cell Recruitment1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[105]  S. Kondo,et al.  Contribution of the CD28 molecule to allergic and irritant-induced skin reactions in CD28 -/- mice. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[106]  M. Maurer,et al.  Critical role of IL-10 in the induction of low zone tolerance to contact allergens. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[107]  G. Girolomoni,et al.  Human CD25+ Regulatory T Cells Maintain Immune Tolerance to Nickel in Healthy, Nonallergic Individuals 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[108]  F. Ginhoux,et al.  Blood-derived dermal langerin+ dendritic cells survey the skin in the steady state , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[109]  M. Gonçalo,et al.  Skin diseases with high public health impact. Contact dermatitis. , 2007, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[110]  A. Enk,et al.  CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress contact hypersensitivity reactions by blocking influx of effector T cells into inflamed tissue , 2006, European journal of immunology.

[111]  C. Albanesi,et al.  IL-17 Is Produced by Nickel-Specific T Lymphocytes and Regulates ICAM-1 Expression and Chemokine Production in Human Keratinocytes: Synergistic or Antagonist Effects with IFN-γ and TNF-α , 1999, The Journal of Immunology.

[112]  E. Berg,et al.  The cutaneous lymphocyte antigen is a skin lymphocyte homing receptor for the vascular lectin endothelial cell-leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[113]  I. Homma,et al.  Antigen-specific T cell sensitization is impaired in IL-17-deficient mice, causing suppression of allergic cellular and humoral responses. , 2002, Immunity.

[114]  R. Daynes,et al.  Relationship between epidermal Langerhans cell density ATPase activity and the induction of contact hypersensitivity. , 1981, Journal of immunology.

[115]  G. Freeman,et al.  Ox40-ligand has a critical costimulatory role in dendritic cell:T cell interactions. , 1999, Immunity.

[116]  S. Akira,et al.  Essential role of MHC II-independent CD4+ T cells, IL-4 and STAT6 in contact hypersensitivity induced by fluorescein isothiocyanate in the mouse. , 2004, International immunology.

[117]  J. Garbarino,et al.  CD8+ T Cells Are the Effectors of the Contact Dermatitis Induced by Urushiol in Mice and Are Regulated by CD4+ T Cells , 1998, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[118]  A. Wisnewski,et al.  Differential roles for CD4 and CD8 T cells after diisocyanate sensitization: genetic control of TH2-induced lung inflammation. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[119]  H. Ishida,et al.  Keratinocyte gene therapy for systemic diseases. Circulating interleukin 10 released from gene-transferred keratinocytes inhibits contact hypersensitivity at distant areas of the skin. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[120]  Y. Iwakura,et al.  IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha are involved in urushiol-induced contact hypersensitivity in mice. , 2005, Immunology and cell biology.

[121]  S. Aiba Dendritic Cells-Importance in Allergy. , 2007, Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology.

[122]  M. Mahmoudi Challenging cases in allergic and immunologic diseases of the skin , 2010 .

[123]  C. Albanesi,et al.  IL-17 is produced by nickel-specific T lymphocytes and regulates ICAM-1 expression and chemokine production in human keratinocytes: synergistic or antagonist effects with IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[124]  R. Fairchild,et al.  IL-12 Augments CD8+ T Cell Development for Contact Hypersensitivity Responses and Circumvents Anti-CD154 Antibody-Mediated Inhibition1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[125]  M. Hahne,et al.  Cytotoxicity Is Mandatory for CD8+ T Cell–mediated Contact Hypersensitivity , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[126]  D. Belsito,et al.  The diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis in the new millennium. , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[127]  G. Freeman,et al.  PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. , 2008, Annual review of immunology.

[128]  S. Poulsen,et al.  IL-23 and T(H)17-mediated inflammation in human allergic contact dermatitis. , 2009, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[129]  R. Fairchild,et al.  cell regulation of effector CD 8 T cell development for contact hypersensitivity responses , 2005 .

[130]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Thermodynamic and spectroscopic study of Cu(II) and Ni(II) binding to bovine serum albumin , 2002, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry.

[131]  E. Shevach From vanilla to 28 flavors: multiple varieties of T regulatory cells. , 2006, Immunity.

[132]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  Inducing and expanding regulatory T cell populations by foreign antigen , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[133]  D. Buckley,et al.  Fragrance as an occupational allergen. , 2002, Occupational medicine.

[134]  A. Cavani,et al.  New aspects of the molecular basis of contact allergy , 2007, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[135]  J. Sabatté,et al.  Interplay of pathogens, cytokines and other stress signals in the regulation of dendritic cell function. , 2007, Cytokine & growth factor reviews.

[136]  Stefan F. Martin,et al.  A high frequency of allergen‐specific 
CD8+ Tc1 cells is associated with the murine immune response to the contact sensitizer trinitrophenyl , 2003, Experimental dermatology.

[137]  C. Albanesi,et al.  Effector and regulatory T cells in allergic contact dermatitis. , 2001, Trends in immunology.

[138]  J. Lepoittevin Metabolism versus chemical transformation or pro‐ versus prehaptens? , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[139]  T. Biedermann,et al.  Reversal of established delayed type hypersensitivity reactions following therapy with IL‐4 or antigen‐specific Th2 cells , 2001, European journal of immunology.

[140]  B. Sachs,et al.  Allergic and autoimmune reactions to xenobiotics: how do they arise? , 1998, Immunology today.

[141]  E. Devilard,et al.  The dermis contains langerin+ dendritic cells that develop and function independently of epidermal Langerhans cells , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[142]  C. Elmets,et al.  CD8+ IL-17-Producing T Cells Are Important in Effector Functions for the Elicitation of Contact Hypersensitivity Responses1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[143]  R. Tigelaar,et al.  Roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine contact sensitivity revealed by in vivo monoclonal antibody depletion. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[144]  C. Akdis,et al.  Targeting keratinocyte apoptosis in the treatment of atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. , 2001, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[145]  R. Fairchild,et al.  CD8+ T cells produce IL‐2, which is required for CD4+CD25+ T cell regulation of effector CD8+ T cell development for contact hypersensitivity responses , 2005, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[146]  E. Padovan,et al.  T cell immune responses to haptens. Structural models for allergic and autoimmune reactions. , 1996, Toxicology.

[147]  H. Weltzien,et al.  Carrier-independent hapten recognition and promiscuous MHC restriction by CD4 T cells induced by trinitrophenylated peptides. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[148]  M. Steinhoff,et al.  Cytokines and chemokines orchestrate atopic skin inflammation. , 2006, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[149]  S. Martin,et al.  Role of hapten-anchoring peptides in defining hapten-epitopes for MHC-restricted cytotoxic T cells. Cross-reactive TNP-determinants on different peptides. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[150]  A. Cavani,et al.  Contact hypersensitivity in MHC class II-deficient mice depends on CD8 T lymphocytes primed by immunostimulating Langerhans cells. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[151]  F. Saltel,et al.  Cutting Edge: Immediate RANTES Secretion by Resting Memory CD8 T Cells Following Antigenic Stimulation 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[152]  J. Mora,et al.  T-cell homing specificity and plasticity: new concepts and future challenges. , 2006, Trends in immunology.

[153]  J. Nicolas,et al.  Sensibilisation versus tolérance dans l’eczéma de contact , 2008 .

[154]  C. Albanesi,et al.  Inflammatory , 2020, Definitions.

[155]  C. Elmets,et al.  High‐level expression of B7‐H1 molecules by dendritic cells suppresses the function of activated T cells and desensitizes allergen‐primed animals , 2006, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[156]  Martin J. Mueller,et al.  Abbreviations used: Bet.-APE, , 2022 .

[157]  A. O’Garra,et al.  TH1 cells control themselves by producing interleukin-10 , 2007, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[158]  Stefan Bereswill,et al.  Toll-like receptor and IL-12 signaling control susceptibility to contact hypersensitivity , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[159]  Lisa C. Zaba,et al.  Resident and "inflammatory" dendritic cells in human skin. , 2009, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[160]  J. Revillard,et al.  Major histocompatibility complex class I‐restricted CD8+ T cells and class II‐restricted CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediate and regulate contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[161]  G. Girolomoni,et al.  Immunoregulation of hapten and drug induced immune reactions , 2003, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.