Innovation types and labour organisational practices: A comparison of foreign and domestic firms in the Reggio Emilia industrial districts

In his Theory of Economic Development, Schumpeter introduced the distinction between different innovation types. Since then, a variety of studies have addressed this topic. However, despite of the recognised significance of more de-verticalised organisational forms in shaping and directing firms' innovative performance, no attempt has been made, as far as our knowledge is concerned, to investigate whether these practices are linked to the introduction of specific innovation types. The aim of the study is to fill this gap by investigating the impact of de-verticalised forms of labour organisational practices, different modes of organising research and development activity and the nature of employees' competences on the likelihood of introducing different types of innovations, controlling for firm's size and sectoral specificities. The results obtained on a sample of 199 firms located in Reggio Emilia province in Italy confirm that innovation development is a heterogeneous activity. The empirical evidence gathered also shows that foreign and domestic firms do not differ, to some extent, in the introduction of different kinds of innovations. However, being foreign or domestic is a discriminating factor in the introduction of innovations stimulating labour organisational developments.

[1]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[2]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[3]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[4]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[5]  Boyan Jovanovic.  Selection and the evolution of industry , 1981 .

[6]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[7]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[8]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[9]  M. Aoki.  Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm , 2013 .

[10]  G. M. P. Swann.  Quality Innovation: An Economic Analysis of Rapid Improvements in Microelectronic Components , 1986 .

[11]  John Lunn,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Process and Product Patenting: A Simultaneous Equation Framework , 1986 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[13]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[15]  青木 昌彦.  Information, incentives, and bargaining in the Japanese economy , 1988 .

[16]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[17]  M. Aoki.  Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy: A Microtheory of the Japanese Economy , 1988 .

[18]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[19]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[20]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Linking Product and Process Innovations and Modes of International Sourcing in Global Competition: A Case of Foreign Multinational Firms , 1990 .

[21]  W. MacLeod,et al.  Multiskilling, Technical Change and the Japanese Firm , 1991 .

[22]  R. Nelson.  Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[23]  James M. Hulbert,et al.  Profiles of Product Innovators Among Large U.S. Manufacturers , 1992 .

[24]  B. Harrison,et al.  Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility. , 1995 .

[25]  D. Maillat.  Territorial Dynamic, Innovative Milieus and Regional Policy , 1995 .

[26]  F. Pyke,et al.  Local and regional response to global pressure : the case of Italy and its industrial districts , 1996 .

[27]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[28]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[29]  Sebastiano Brusco,et al.  Competitività e partecipazione. Un istituto per il lavoro per promuovere un modello di relazioni industriali basato sulla cooperazione , 1997 .

[30]  Competitivita e partecipazione , 1997 .

[31]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  The Resource-Based Perspective: An Assessment and Diagnosis of Problems , 1998 .

[32]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[33]  Innovation and Performance of SMEs in Italy: the Relevance of Spatial Aspects , 1998 .

[34]  Ester Martínez-Ros,et al.  EXPLAINING THE DECISIONS TO CARRY OUT PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATIONS IN THE SPANISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY , 1998 .

[35]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view , 1999 .

[36]  Ronald Dore,et al.  Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism , 2000 .

[37]  Silvia Massini,et al.  Innovative forms of organising in Europe and Japan 1 This research has been funded by the Economic a , 2000 .

[38]  C. Antonelli.  Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts , 2000 .

[39]  Ronald Dore,et al.  Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism: Japan and Germany Versus the Anglo-Saxons , 2000 .

[40]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[41]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Product Innovation, Process Innovation, and Size , 2001 .

[42]  U. Haner.  Innovation quality—a conceptual framework , 2002 .

[43]  ORGANISATIONAL INNOVATIONS, HUMAN RESOURCES AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS , 2002 .

[44]  ORGANISATIONAL INNOVATION , HUMAN RESOURCES AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS An enquire on the food sector in Emilia-Romagna , 2002 .

[45]  Peter V. Nielsen,et al.  Innovation, Learning Organizations and Industrial Relations , 2003 .

[46]  Sandrine Labory,et al.  Flat Hierarchical Structure, Bundles of New Work Practices and Firm Performance , 2003 .

[47]  Keld Laursen,et al.  New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance , 2003 .

[48]  Massimiliano Mazzanti,et al.  Adoption of Techno-Organizational Innovations, and Industrial Relations in Manifacturing Firms: An Analysis for Local Industrial System , 2004 .

[49]  Roberto Simonetti,et al.  Product and process innovations: How are they defined? How are they quantified? , 2005, Scientometrics.