MANAGEMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: A EUROPEAN CONSENSUS

This report summarises the findings of a European Consensus Group review of current standards of care in locally advanced prostate cancer defined as (a) untreated cancer extending clinically beyond the prostatic capsule in patients with no evidence of lymph node invasion or distant metastases, and (b) residual disease remaining after local treatment with positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, persistent prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and/or secondary PSA relapse. There was no overall consensus as to the standard of care in clinically apparent locally advanced prostate cancer. It was agreed, however, that hormonal therapy (e.g. with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue [GnRHa]) represents a valid treatment in these patients. Treatment practices and regimens vary considerably between European countries, but GnRHa is widely used, either alone or in combination with antiandrogens. Hormonal therapy alone is a valid option, though the optimal modality, timing and duration of treatment remain to be defined. Adjuvant therapy with a GnRHa has been shown to improve survival in patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. It is a viable option after prostatectomy in patients with persistent or secondary relapsing PSA. It was determined that optimal treatment will be different according to PSA, clinical staging and Gleason score, and the treatment of locally advanced disease should be individually tailored after discussion between physician and patient. In many instances, patients prefer and expect some form of treatment in preference to watchful waiting. Treatment nomograms such as the Kattan nomograms provide precise, comprehensive and invaluable tools for everyday use and may be used to predict outcomes and guide treatment decisions.

[1]  R. Stock,et al.  Biochemical outcomes following hormonal therapy, Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and 3D conformal external beam irradiation in the treatment of high risk prostate cancer , 2002 .

[2]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Contemporary patterns of androgen deprivation therapy use for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. , 2002, Urology.

[3]  N. Dawson Bisphosphonates: their evolving role in the management of prostate cancer-related bone disease , 2002, Current opinion in urology.

[4]  Matthew R. Smith Osteoporosis during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, Urology.

[5]  P. Iversen Antiandrogen monotherapy: indications and results. , 2002, Urology.

[6]  T. Tammela,et al.  Bicalutamide as immediate therapy either alone or as adjuvant to standard care of patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: first analysis of the early prostate cancer program. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Pierre I Karakiewicz,et al.  International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Systematic review and meta‐analysis of monotherapy compared with combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[9]  Jacques Bernier,et al.  Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[10]  P. Babb,et al.  Patterns and trends in prostate cancer incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality. Part I: international comparisons , 2002, BJU international.

[11]  Robert L. Sutherland,et al.  Validation Study of the Accuracy of a Postoperative Nomogram for Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer , 2002 .

[12]  M. Kattan,et al.  Validation study of the accuracy of a postoperative nomogram for recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  D. Wood,et al.  Neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy in cT2bNxMo prostate cancer: 5-year results. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[15]  A W Partin,et al.  Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. , 2002, Urology.

[16]  L. Dogliotti,et al.  Metabolic bone disease induced by prostate cancer: rationale for the use of bisphosphonates. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[17]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Pamidronate to prevent bone loss during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Gelmini,et al.  Telomerase in urological malignancy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[19]  P. Walsh,et al.  A structured debate: immediate versus deferred androgen suppression in prostate cancer-evidence for deferred treatment. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[20]  P. Schellhammer Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone monotherapy: a viable option for treatment of prostate cancer? , 2001, Urology.

[21]  C. Abbou,et al.  EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer , 2001, European Urology.

[22]  D. Grignon,et al.  Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  G. Hanks,et al.  Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  A. Zlotta,et al.  4–Year Follow–Up Results of a European Prospective Randomized Study on Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy prior to Radical Prostatectomy in T2–3N0M0 Prostate Cancer , 2000, European Urology.

[25]  T. Tammela,et al.  Bicalutamide monotherapy compared with castration in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced prostate cancer: 6.3 years of followup. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[26]  J. Wolff,et al.  Intermittent Androgen Blockade in Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Clinical Experience , 2000, European Urology.

[27]  A. Haese*,et al.  Stage Migration in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2000, European Urology.

[28]  Crawford,et al.  Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 2000, The Lancet.

[29]  L. Potters,et al.  Examining the role of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation in patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  J. Manola,et al.  Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  N. Mottet,et al.  Intermittent versus continuous hormone deprivation in metastatic prostate cancer: preliminary data from an ongoing European study , 1999, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[32]  A W Partin,et al.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. , 1999, JAMA.

[33]  Agostini Ct Guidelines on the management of prostate cancer. , 1999 .

[34]  U. Tunn,et al.  Intermittent Complete Androgen Blockade in PSA Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy and Incidental Prostate Cancer , 1998, European Urology.

[35]  I. Thompson,et al.  Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  T. Tammela,et al.  A Randomised Comparison of ‘Casodex’TM (Bicalutamide) 150 mg Monotherapy versus Castration in the Treatment of Metastatic and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer , 1998, European Urology.

[37]  P. Walsh,et al.  Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group. , 1997 .

[38]  A. Partin,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control. , 1997, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[39]  W. Ellis,et al.  Intermittent androgen suppression with leuprolide and flutamide for prostate cancer: a pilot study. , 1996, Urology.

[40]  J. Gingell,et al.  A prospective, randomised study to compare goserelin acetate (Zoladex) versus cyproterone acetate (Cyprostat) versus a combination of the two in the treatment of metastatic prostatic carcinoma. , 1996, European urology.

[41]  W. Catalona,et al.  Management of cancer of the prostate. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  S. Goldenberg,et al.  Effects of intermittent androgen suppression on androgen‐dependent tumors. Apoptosis and serum prostate‐specific antigen , 1993, Cancer.

[43]  P. Goodman,et al.  A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[45]  R. Sylvester,et al.  EORTC protocol 30761: a randomized study of non-metastatic and metastatic prostatic cancer treated by cyproterone acetate versus diethylstilbestrol and medroxyprogesterone acetate. European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Urological Group. , 1989, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[46]  J. Johansson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of flutamide and estramustine as initial treatment of metastatic carcinoma of prostate. , 1987, Urology.

[47]  D P Byar,et al.  Carcinoma of the prostate: Prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies , 1972 .