The Opportunities and Challenges of Using Photo-Elicitation in Child-Centered Constructivist Grounded Theory Research

In the last three decades, there has been a growing interest in listening to children’s voices in child health research. Ensuring an appropriate level of dialogical engagement with children calls for participatory methods. Auto-driven photo-elicitation interviews (PEIs) are a powerful approach to obtain rich data from children. This article discusses the opportunities and challenges of using auto-driven PEIs in a health-related child-centered constructivist grounded theory study conducted in a poor-resourced country. Our experience shows that while the approach is effective for facilitating co-construction of data with children and for addressing the ethical and methodological issues associated with child-centered research in the context of a developing country, it is narrow on its own. Broadening the term to “picture-elicitation interviews” to allow for the inclusion of other forms of images would make the method more adaptable and inclusive. This would give children the flexibility of choosing pictorial options that best suit them and also help child participants and researchers address the practical and cultural challenges associated with the use of auto-driven PEI in a poor-resourced country.

[1]  David Bate Photography Theory , 2020, Photography: The Key Concepts.

[2]  B. Carter,et al.  Auto-driven Photo Elicitation Interviews in Research with Children: Ethical and Practical Considerations , 2017, Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing.

[3]  P. Tennent,et al.  Worth a Thousand Words? Advantages, Challenges and Opportunities in Working with Photovoice as a Qualitative Research Method with Youth and their Families , 2016 .

[4]  S. Kools,et al.  “I Am Normal”: Claiming Normalcy in Christian‐Identified HIV‐Infected Adolescent and Emerging Adult Males , 2016, The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC.

[5]  J. Gleadle,et al.  The social determinants of health for people with type 1 diabetes that progress to end‐stage renal disease , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  G. Valentine,et al.  ‘Big Brother welcomes you’: exploring innovative methods for research with children and young people outside of the home and school environments , 2015 .

[7]  Kyle E. Miller Dear Critics: Addressing Concerns and Justifying the Benefits of Photography as a Research Method , 2015 .

[8]  Renata Pires-Yfantouda,et al.  Understanding adolescent type 1 diabetes self-management as an adaptive process: A grounded theory approach , 2015, Psychology & health.

[9]  J. Thannhauser Navigating Life and Loss in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis , 2014, Qualitative health research.

[10]  Leena Alanen,et al.  Theorizing childhood , 2014 .

[11]  M. O’Reilly,et al.  Research with Children: Theory and Practice , 2013 .

[12]  Gina Porter,et al.  Youth, mobility and mobile phones in Africa: findings from a three-country study , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Mary Jo Williams Middle Childhood , 2011, Bright Futures Nutrition.

[14]  Melanie Birks,et al.  Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide , 2011, QMiP Bulletin.

[15]  Clive Robinson,et al.  research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques , 2010 .

[16]  Ana Meo Picturing Students' Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires , 2010 .

[17]  Katherine Davies,et al.  Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research , 2008 .

[18]  S. Kirk,et al.  Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review. , 2007, International journal of nursing studies.

[19]  Tina Cook,et al.  What the Camera Sees and from Whose Perspective , 2007 .

[20]  I. Epstein,et al.  Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI): Using Photos to Elicit Children's Perspectives , 2006 .

[21]  K. Francis,et al.  Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: implications for research design. , 2006, International journal of nursing practice.

[22]  J. Rollins,et al.  Tell Me About It: Drawing as a Communication Tool for Children With Cancer , 2005, Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses.

[23]  J. Gardner,et al.  Assessing the quality of early years learning environments , 2005 .

[24]  Marisol Clark-Ibáñez Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews , 2004 .

[25]  N. Thomas,et al.  The ethics of participatory research with children , 1998 .

[26]  B. Kozusznik,et al.  [United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund]. , 1979, Pediatria polska.

[27]  Gina Porter,et al.  Mobile Phones and Education in Sub‐Saharan Africa: From Youth Practice to Public Policy , 2016 .

[28]  J. Adu-Gyamfi Childhood construction and its implications for children’s participation in Ghana , 2014 .

[29]  Kwabena Anane Kwarteng Duties & Responsibilities of Children in Ghana: Perspectives of Children and Adults in Kumasi , 2012 .

[30]  Afua Twum-Danso Reciprocity, Respect and Responsibility: The 3Rs Underlying Parent-Child Relationships in Ghana and the Implications for Children's Rights , 2009 .

[31]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  The Value of Pictures: Photo Elicitation Techniques for Value Sensitive Design , 2008 .

[32]  H. Close The use of photography as a qualitative research tool. , 2007, Nurse researcher.

[33]  M. Moran,et al.  Moving toward Visual Literacy: Photography as a Language of Teacher Inquiry. , 2005 .

[34]  Samantha Punch,et al.  Interviewing Strategies with Young People: The 'Secret Box', Stimulus Material and Task-based Activities , 2002 .

[35]  T. Fálolá,et al.  Culture and Customs of Ghana , 2002 .

[36]  A. Fontana,et al.  The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text , 2000 .