An Analysis of Teacher-Student Interaction Patterns in a Robotics Course for Kindergarten Children: A Pilot Study

Compared with other media, programmable bricks provide children with the opportunity to create their own product and, through this process, to express creative thinking. Studies have found that learning robotics or integrating programming bricks into courses can help to develop students’ problem-solving abilities and enhance their learning performance. This study attempted to develop a one-to-one Topobo robotics course for kindergarten children and to explore teacher-student interaction patterns. This study used a creative thinking spiral as the framework for the Topobo robotics course. The research sample included a five-year-old child and a preschool teacher. Topobo, the programmable bricks, was the main learning tool in this course, and the sequential analysis method was used to identify teacher-student interaction patterns. Based on the frequency of the teacher-student interactions, this study found that two behaviors, the student’s “play” and the teacher’s “guidance,” appeared most frequently. Moreover, the results of sequential analysis and content analysis of the videotaped learning process indicated that the teacher’s guidance helped the student to assemble or play with the Topobo bricks. The teacher’s questions encouraged the student to express and share his ideas or identify and solve problems. This study proposes suggestions for future studies on this issue.

[1]  Pao-Ta Yu,et al.  Factors Influencing Women's Attitudes towards Computers in a Computer Literacy Training Program , 2012 .

[2]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory , 2004, CHI.

[4]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Exploring the Media Literacy of Taiwanese Elementary School Students , 2011 .

[5]  T. Lubart.  Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[6]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Parents' perceptions of educational programmable bricks for kids , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Project InterActions: A Multigenerational Robotic Learning Environment , 2007 .

[9]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Developing evaluative indicators for educational computer games , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Po-Yao Chao,et al.  Exploring the Possibility of Using Humanoid Robots as Instructional Tools for Teaching a Second Language in Primary School , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Developing and Validating a Media Literacy Self-Evaluation Scale (MLSS) for Elementary School Students. , 2011 .

[13]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Game-Based Remedial Instruction in Mastery Learning for Upper-Primary School Students , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  A Case Analysis of Creative Spiral Instruction Model and Students' Creative Problem Solving Performance in a LEGO® Robotics Course , 2009, Edutainment.

[15]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Technologies for lifelong kindergarten , 1998 .

[16]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu.  Avoiding Internet Addiction When Integrating Digital Games into Teaching , 2011 .

[17]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF MOTIVATION AND LEARNING STRATEGY IN A CREATIVITY-SUPPORTING LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2012 .

[18]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  EFFECTS OF IMPROVEMENT ON SELECTIVE ATTENTION: DEVELOPING APPROPRIATE SOMATOSENSORY VIDEO GAME INTERVENTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONAL-DWELLING ELDERLY WITH DISABILITIES , 2012 .

[19]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Exploring parents' perceptions towards educational robots: Gender and socio-economic differences , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Celia Renata Rosemberg,et al.  Teacher–Children Interaction and Concept Development in Kindergarten , 2009 .

[21]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Global channels of evidence for learning and assessment in complex game environments , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  David Mioduser,et al.  Does it “want” or “was it programmed to...”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning , 2008 .

[23]  M. Resnick.  Sowing the Seeds for a more Creative Society , 2009, CHI 2009.

[24]  R. Bakeman,et al.  Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, 2nd ed. , 1997 .

[25]  Ned A. Flanders,et al.  Analyzing Teaching Behavior , 1970 .

[26]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu.  Early adolescents' perceptions of educational robots and learning of robotics , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Student Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy in a Cooperative Robotics Course , 2010 .

[28]  Liu Jingbo,et al.  Teacher–child interaction in Chinese kindergartens: an observational analysis , 2005 .

[29]  David J. Miller,et al.  Using a games console in the primary classroom: Effects of 'Brain Training' programme on computation and self-esteem , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..