Variation with age of dental cephalometric variables in Class II, division 2 patients.

[1]  Sam F. Wallis,et al.  Integration Of Certain Variants Of The Facial Skeleton In Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion , 2009 .

[2]  N. Brezniak,et al.  Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  M. Kataja,et al.  Class II Division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  C J Burstone,et al.  Simultaneous intrusion and retraction using a three-piece base arch. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  M. R. Joshi,et al.  A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[6]  S. Peck,et al.  Dental arch width in Class II Division 2 deep-bite malocclusion. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  B G Lapatki,et al.  The Importance of the Level of the Lip Line and Resting Lip Pressure in Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[8]  I. Mischak,et al.  Study of the Extent of Torque, Protrusion and Intrusion of the Incisors in the Context of Class II, Division 2 Treatment in Adults , 2002, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[9]  J. Debaets.  Pseudo-Class I reevaluation of traditional Class II treatment. , 1997 .

[10]  L S Fishman,et al.  Timing of cervical headgear treatment based on skeletal maturation. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  C. P. Adams,et al.  Incisor inclination in Class 2 division 2 malocclusions. , 1986, European journal of orthodontics.

[12]  A. König,et al.  A Cephalometric Comparison between Angle Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion and Normal Occlusion in Adults , 1985, British journal of orthodontics.

[13]  A. Lowe,et al.  Associations between anterior temporal, masseter, and orbicularis oris muscle activity and craniofacial morphology in children. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[14]  R. Slavicek,et al.  Étude et comparaison de valeurs céphalométriques régionales en Autriche et en Allemagne , 1982 .

[15]  A. L. Posen,et al.  The application of quantitative perioral assessment to orthodontic case analysis and treatment planning. , 1976, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  H. P. Hitchcock.  The cephalometric distinction of class II, division 2 malocclusion. , 1976, American journal of orthodontics.

[17]  G. G. Fletcher.  The Retroclined Upper Incisor , 1975, British journal of orthodontics.

[18]  J. Mills.  The Problem of Overbite in Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion , 1973, British journal of orthodontics.

[19]  A. Björk,et al.  Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  A. L. Posen,et al.  The influence of maximum perioral and tongue force on the incisor teeth. , 1972, The Angle orthodontist.

[21]  R. Nanda.  THE RATES OF GROWTH OF SEVERAL FACIAL COMPONENTS MEASURED FROM SERIAL CEPHALOMETRIC ROENTGENOGRAMS , 1955 .

[22]  M. Grosse-Wienker.  Ein Beitrag zur Behandlung des Deckbisses, insbesondere des oft stark komprimierten und untersichgehenden Unterkieferzahnbogens , 1953, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[23]  Ch. Rehan Qamar,et al.  CEPHALOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 AND CLASS II DIVISION 2 MALOCCLUSION , 2010 .

[24]  G. Korkhaus.  Über den Aufbau des Gesichtsschädels beim Deckbiß , 2005, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[25]  C. Mills,et al.  Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion. , 1997, The Angle orthodontist.

[26]  H. Pancherz,et al.  The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. , 1997, The Angle orthodontist.

[27]  R. Nanda,et al.  Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of maxilla and mandible. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  A. T. Karlsen.  Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class II div. 2 malocclusion combined with extreme deep bite. , 1994, The Angle orthodontist.

[29]  B. Ingervall,et al.  Cranial morphology and dental arch dimensions in children with Angle class II, div. 2 malocclusion. , 1973, Odontologisk revy.

[30]  N. Robertson,et al.  FEATURE OF THE UPPER CENTRAL INCISORS IN CLASS II, DIVISION 2. , 1965, The Angle orthodontist.