Life cycle assessment of a hypothetical Canadian pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture process system

The methodology of life cycle assessment was applied for evaluating the environmental performance of a Saskatchewan lignite integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)-based electricity generation plant with and without the pre-combustion CO2 capture process. A comparison between the IGCC systems (with and without CO2 capture) and the competing lignite pulverized coal electricity generating station was conducted to reveal which technology offers more positive environmental effects. The results showed significant reduction of GHG emissions where both post- and pre-combustion CO2 capture processes are applied. With the application of the CO2 removal technology, GHG emissions were reduced by 27–86%. The performances of the IGCC systems were superior to those of the pulverized coal systems. However, in terms of other environmental impacts, multiple environmental trade-offs are involved depending on the capture technology. For the post-combustion CO2 capture process system, it was observed that the environmental impact was shifted from the air compartment to the soil and water compartments. The IGCC systems showed the same tendency of shifting from air pollution to soil and water pollution, but the amount of pollution is less significant. This is likely because the IGCC system operates at higher efficiencies; hence, it requires less fuel and produces fewer emissions.

[1]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[2]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Integrated Gasifier Combined Cycle Plant with Integrated CO2 – H2S Removal: Performance Analysis, Life Cycle Assessment and Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment , 2002 .

[3]  Jarotwan Koiwanit,et al.  A life cycle assessment study of a Canadian post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process system , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies , 2011 .

[5]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in power generation and industry in Europe , 2013 .

[6]  Oa Us Epa Overview of Greenhouse Gases , 2015 .

[7]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants , 2009 .

[8]  John Davison,et al.  Technologies for capture of carbon dioxide , 2005 .

[9]  Jay A. Ratafia-brown,et al.  An Environmental Assessment of IGCC Power Systems , 2002 .

[10]  Manfred Fischedick,et al.  Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany , 2007 .

[11]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Technical Documentation: Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Systems (IGCC) with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2007 .

[12]  M. K. Mann,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-fired Power Production , 1999 .

[13]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Simplified Performance Model of Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Systems , 2004 .

[14]  Terry Wall,et al.  Combustion processes for carbon capture , 2007 .